.....Advertisement.....
.....Advertisement.....
Andy Bitter

Taking stock of the Hokies’ roster: Quarterbacks

There are still 44 days until Virginia Tech opens spring practice, which is a lot of downtime to fill on a football-only blog. Sure, there’s the NFL Combine, pre-draft stuff, pro day and the release of the ACC schedule (which, at this rate, might not come out until July), but that’s not going to cover every day.

So I’m starting what will be a periodic position-by-position look at Virginia Tech’s scholarship situation, taking stock of the roster. These aren’t going to come one right after another right in a row. I’ll space them out so they run on relatively light days for the blog, but I’ll get through every position before springs starts.

I hope to talk to every assistant coach at some point between now and the spring too to shed some light on how each position group looks. Stay tuned to the blog for those updates.

Follow me on Twitter.

Let’s start with the quarterbacks:

* Seniors: None

* Juniors: Logan Thomas

* Sophomores: Mark LealTrey Gresh

* Redshirt freshmen: T.J. Shaw, Brian Rody

* Incoming freshmen: Brenden Motley, Connor Jessop

* Current scholarship players (2): Thomas, Leal

* Incoming scholarship players (1): Motley

* What to think of the returners: It doesn’t get much more solid that Thomas, who, if he wasn’t already, will be the Hokies’ meal ticket in 2012. Given another full spring to develop as a quarterback (and remember that he’s been doing it full-time, year-round for two and a half years now), he could put up big numbers again next season if the offensive line and receiving corps come together. Coaches have had good things to say about Leal, although he’s only played in garbage time. He’ll need to develop this spring to give the coaches some peace of mind, especially with how often Thomas throws his 6-foot-6, 254-pound frame into the fray.

* What to think of the newcomers: Motley is the only scholarship guy in the 2012 class, and Tech appears ready to keep him at quarterback. He should be a work in progress. He ran a Wing T offense at Christiansburg High, so his dropback skills are probably not refined, although he’s got good size (6-3, 195) and Tech is eager to see what he can do given some time to develop. He’ll benefit from redshirting and learning the ins and outs of the position. Jessop is expected to join the team as a preferred walk-on. He’s a big kid (6-4, 210) in the pro-style mold from the Washington, D.C., area who had a scholarship offer from Richmond but chose to pay his own way in Blacksburg.

* What does the future bode? Virginia Tech needs to sign at least one quarterback in 2013. Thomas is eligible to go pro and he has the kind of measurables that would make NFL scouts drool. Whether he’d consider it or not remains to be seen. He’s still relatively new to the quarterback position and, from what I can gather, enjoys the college life. But there’s no guarantee he’ll be around for his senior season in 2013. Leal isn’t a prototype quarterback (he’s 6 feet tall), so it’s unclear if he’s the future once Thomas leaves. Reports indicate the Hokies have targeted Virginia Beach’s Bucky Hodges as a 2013 recruit. He’s a 6-foot-5, 220-pound prospect in the same mold of Thomas. Given the difference in years, he could carry the torch once Thomas leaves, much like Thomas did when Tyrod Taylor graduated.

Sphere: Related Content

Share

6 Comments »

  1. Saw Leal play just a few snaps but his arm looks quite good. Concerned about next year for LT with a new OL and Boykin and Coale gone. They have some good receivers coming back but those 2 guys were special. There definitely will be a period of adjustment, especially with the OL.

    Comment by scott whitaker — February 13, 2012 @ 1:08 pm

  2. Leal seemed be to a pretty good replacement. Had LT not done some of the things he had, the faithful would have been clamoring for Leal in a heartbeat, no different than when folks thought Al Clark was better than Jim Druckenmiller. Tech will be fine at QB.

    For my money, I think Brenden Motley will make a nice ‘next generation’ QB for Tech.

    Heck, nobody even knew, or thought, Logan could, or would, be a QB, so that just shows what the average fan, sportwriter, or recruiting pundit knows.

    Pretty much just shows what the average person knows, don’t you think?

    Comment by Rick H. — February 13, 2012 @ 2:40 pm

  3. Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn’t Jake Locker of Washington a Wing T quarterback? He got drafted and played somewhat well for the Titans, and if he can be groomed, I’ll expect to see great thing in store for Locker.

    Anyway, back to the Hokies, I like Leal because he adds the ability to scramble, but not with the same afterburner speed Tyrod brought to the team. Give Motley time to grow, add some pounds and muscle to his frame, and I think he’ll be another good one for Tech. Seen him play only once and I was convinced he could be a good one. It’s not often a kid in the school’s backyard blossom, but he might be the exception.

    Comment by Trevor — February 13, 2012 @ 6:06 pm

  4. While there are a few respectable “stop-gap” type QBs behind Thomas, I would not expect any of them to be 2 or 3 year starters. VVT is going hard and heavy for a few blue chip QBs in this class and I expect them to sell major playing time, and land the next great one…

    Comment by Tony — February 16, 2012 @ 10:33 am

  5. I think Scott hit the crux of the matter. It seems to me that many forget how important the guys weighing in at 300+ are to the numbers the skill players put up. Take a mostly new OL and I’m thinking the Orange and Maroon really need to get Leal ready to go in the event LT comes up with a high ankle sprain or some such because a missed block forces him into a dangerous ad lib.

    Comment by Robert B — March 15, 2012 @ 10:40 am

  6. Will there be a section on Coaches evaluating them and where changes are needed?? There is room for improvement or replacement for each and EVERY position.

    Comment by Peppers Ferry — March 17, 2012 @ 5:54 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

About this blog

Andy Bitter writes about Virginia Tech football all year round. Join in! And follow him on Twitter: @AndyBitterVT.

RSS feed

Search Andy Bitter's blog


.....Advertisement.....

Most Commented / Recent

Recent Comments

  • SCHokieFan: Trevor: You were very close on the name of PC. There is only one Presbyterain, the name is Blue Hose....
  • scott whitaker: Stack: Given that VT is 6-2 against GT since joining the conference, including the last 2, and last...
  • Andy Bitter: You could technically include Washington ($70M), Clemson ($61M) and Colorado ($60.9M) too, although...
  • Stack Maroon: There are exceptions to any rule, but Nebraska at $83 million is only slightly below FSU, another team...
  • Andy Bitter: Nebraska’s at $83 million, but yes, your point is well taken.

Categories

Related links

Archives