Don't Miss

Are you the Ultimate Red Sox Fan? Enter your photo in our contest and you could win fan-tastic prizes.

QB Bucky Hodges, DB Charles Clark talk about their recent commitments to Virginia Tech

Bucky Hodges grew up idolizing Michael Vick and Tyrod Taylor, two quarterbacks from the 757 who played at Virginia Tech. He grew up to be 6-foot-5, 225 pounds, bearing a striking resemblance to the Hokies’ current quarterback, Logan Thomas.

Is it any wonder then that Hodges, who was one of six commitments the Hokies got despite their canceled spring game Saturday, found a comfort in choosing Virginia Tech?

“This [visit] just felt like I was at home,” Hodges said in a phone interview Sunday. “I was starting to like feel at home with the players and the coaching staff more.”

Follow me on Twitter.

Hodges wanted to get his commitment done early but didn’t expect to make a decision this soon. He and Salem High teammate Andrew Motu’apuaka, a linebacker with a Tech offer as well, thought about committing right away. They slept on it Friday night, then made it official the next day.

“It feels like a whole lot of pressures will leave now after this,” Hodges said. “I can focus on the season and getting ready to go to Virginia Tech next year.”

It’s a considerable amount of pressure off of the Hokies too. Tech needed a quarterback in this class, with the chance that Thomas could go to the NFL if he has a strong junior season. The only other scholarship quarterback on the roster is Mark Leal. Christiansburg’s Brenden Motley, a 2012 signee, will arrive this summer.

Hodges, the top player in the state by The Roanoke Times, No. 3 by 247 Sports and No. 5 by VirginiaPreps.com, was the target all along. He had a dozen offers, listing his other top schools as  West Virginia, Ohio State, Illinois, East Carolina and Maryland, but Tech made a big push for him. Offensive line coach Curt Newsome had recruited him for some time, and offensive coordinator Bryan Stinespring joined the fray once he returned to the 757 recruiting zone after years in the Roanoke/Lynchburg/Danville corridor.

In going after Hodges and getting him, Virginia Tech may be establishing a pattern with its quarterbacks, built off the Thomas prototype.

“Big, tall and we can both throw on the run,” said the 16-year-old Hodges, who threw for 2,142 yards and 26 touchdowns and ran for 434 yards and nine more scores last year but considers himself more of a passer than a runner.

Hodges also saw similarities in both his offense at Salem and that of the Hokies.

“It’s not exactly the same,” Hodges said, “but the way Virginia Tech is going now, they’re going a little bit more spread and putting in sweeps and all that, and going at a fast tempo, and that’s what my offense is. We run a fast, no-huddle offense and we spread.”

As for his recruitment, he sounded solid on his decision.

“I think I’m done,” he said.

While Hodges didn’t know he’d commit until he arrived in Blacksburg last weekend, King’s Fork defensive back Charles Clark had a plan going in.

“It’s not that I wanted to get it over with, it’s that I knew what I wanted to do and I was confident about it,” he said.

Clark was the first player to commit during the day, doing it in the late morning. He didn’t draw as much fanfare as Hodges, but the 5-foot-11, 180-pound defensive back emerged as a player last year, taking Southeastern District Defensive Player of the Year honors despite playing for a 2-8 team.

Clark had two offers — Virginia Tech and Virginia — although he had drawn some interest from Alabama, Clemson, Nebraska, Penn State, Tennessee and UCLA, according to Rivals. Still, none of those schools offered.

“I had my two offers from Virginia and Virginia Tech, and there were a bunch of other schools who were actually talking, but I feel like they had never come up and made offers yet,” he said. “When I’d see them go and offer somebody in the class of 2014, I mean … I was happy with the two offers I had. I could have finished the whole recruiting process with just two offers and gone all the way to February with two offers and I’d have been happy with it. But I just went on ahead and made a decision that I thought was best for me in a place I was confident with.”

Clark isn’t sure at what position he’ll end up quite yet in college. He said he plays primarily safety in high school but can switch back and forth between that and corner, a versatility that the Hokies like.

He’s a versatile offensive player as well, having rushed for 788 yards and six touchdowns last year. He’ll branch out as King’s Fork revamps its offense next year, playing some slot receiver and some out wide.

But defense is where he’ll play in college, so that’s his focus next season.

“I’ll probably just have to work more on my defense, footwork and things like that,” he said. “I’ve never had a coach tell me there’s a problem with my footwork or things like that, but I’ll just work more on things like that — footwork, opening and running, zone coverages and man coverages and things like that.”

Clark said he probably won’t take any recruiting trips elsewhere but will still try to attend some regular football camps this summer.

As for Tech, a couple reasons sold him on a decision.

“Just the whole family atmosphere there at Virginia Tech,” he said. “I’m trying to come in and play defense, and they’ve always had a great defense.”

Join the conversation [ADD A COMMENT]

10 COMMENTS

  1. Trevor | April 23, 2012 at 12:27 pm

    Andy, I’m not sure if you have seen a YouTube video of Hodges in action, but he looked almost like Cam running from the shotgun or ace formation. His arm strength reminds me of Thomas and can really throw into a tight window.

    If Thomas doesn’t go pro after this upcoming season, I would suspect Tech would like to redshirt Hodges so he could sit behind Thomas and learn the offense like Thomas did during Tyrod’s era.

    As I stated over the weekend, it does look like Tech is focusing on stocking for the future at defensive backs and linebacker. Just hope they continue to go after offensive linemen.

  2. Andy Bitter | April 23, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    My guess is a lot of tall QBs look like Cam against HS competition. Not so much against college folks.

    Bucky’s 6-5, 225, but he’s only 16, so he’s got some time to grow. But Cam Newton was unlike any other player I’ve seen. There are 6-6 guys out there, but none that are 250 and can move the way he did or truck people when he needed to.

    And that includes Logan and Roethlisberger and Josh Freeman and all the other big-bodied QBs that are all the rage right now.

  3. Karl | April 23, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    “There are 6-6 guys out there, but none that are 250 and can move the way he did or truck people when he needed to”

    Vince Young – as a college QB. His performance in the Rose Bowl vs. USC was one of the best individual college performances on a big stage ever, and he did it vs. a defense full of future NFL players. Yeah he didn’t pan out as an NFL QB, but the comment is about college players and at that level Young was every bit what Cam was IMO. Both were listed as 6’5″ in college. Young was listed at 235, Cam at 247. Both dominant and possessing unreal athleticism for their size.

  4. Tom Warden | April 23, 2012 at 1:22 pm

    Not to get off subject, but what’s up with thte 4:00 News conference that was called less than anhour ago by Weaver????

  5. Andy Bitter | April 23, 2012 at 1:28 pm

    Good point on Vince Young, although he certainly was never the passer that these guys are (in college maybe, not in the pros). I think that’s the new thing with these QBs. They know that to play in the NFL, they’ve got to be able to throw. Can’t out-run all those big, speedy NFL guys. Young never figured that out, really.

    As for Weaver, there’s tons of speculation. I’m not going to feed into it. I’ve not heard anything concrete about it. Unless I do, I’m not going to speculate on what it’s about. I will be there, though. So check back or follow me on Twitter for more.

  6. Greg Bowyer | April 23, 2012 at 1:51 pm

    First thought on the news conference is the Stadium Woods issue surrounding the new indoor practice facility. There was a protest recently on campus led by VT professors. Perhaps they have come to an agreement or selected another site for the project.

  7. Beamer Best all-time | April 23, 2012 at 2:26 pm

    Im hearing Arkansas has a press conference at same time…..This better not be the end of the Foster era…..I cant stand this!!!!!!!!!!!!

  8. Andy Bitter | April 23, 2012 at 2:46 pm

    Some are reporting it’s about a change in the head men’s basketball coach.

    And Bud’s not going anywhere. You don’t announce a coach is leaving via press conference. It’s up to the new school to announce his hiring.

  9. Beamer Best all-time | April 23, 2012 at 3:04 pm

    Thank God……we could not lose Foster…..Greenberg-not much of a loss

  10. mark r | April 23, 2012 at 7:27 pm

    andy, not so fast my friend… Some coaching changes are announced via text message, aka, bobby petrino

Error submitting comment

Name is required

A valid email is required (test@test.com)

Comment is required

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published.
All fields are required to comment.

processing

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Weather Journal

Deadly Okla. tornado; Roanoke floods

Mon, 20 May 2013 22:25:48 +0000

About this blog

Andy Bitter writes about Virginia Tech football all year round. Join in! And follow him on Twitter: @AndyBitterVT.

RSS feed


.....Advertisement.....

.....Daily Deal.....


Recent Comments

  • crooked road: The ‘swinging gate’ excuse is as much of a farce as the Beamer excuses for Stinespring were...
  • George: It has been frustrating that Tech has not been blocking kicks and punts like in years past. You used to hear...
  • Jerry: That RB that went to the Cardinals is better than any RB to come out of GT recently so learn his name....
  • crooked road: It’s a tangent, but an important one. The Red Cross is busy in Oklahoma, in this time of need....
  • Beamer in Sneakers: can’t they donate it?

Related Links

Categories

Archives