Don't Miss

Are you the Ultimate Red Sox Fan? Enter your photo in our contest and you could win fan-tastic prizes.

Aw, shucks — yours truly gets half a page in Quill

A few months ago I noted here that I’d won a national award from the Society of Professional Journalists for column writing. The award presentation was Friday night in Washington, D.C., which I didn’t make.The fancy plaque is in the mail.

The organization has a 6-times-a year magazine, Quill. And the current issue is the awards issue. Below is my (half) page, with the other columnist who won an award, too. (Sorry about the colors, which scanned to0 rich).

Look what the judges wrote: “Casey doesn’t much care what others think.” Who’d a thunk?

 

 

Join the conversation [ADD A COMMENT]

46 COMMENTS

  1. Sandi Saunders | July 21, 2012 at 1:08 pm

    Love it Dan, congratulations for well deserved recognition! Eat your heart out matt and Suzie et al!

    I was flabbergasted by the headlines
    People in glasshouses throwing stones
    Gaping wounds that will never heal
    Now they’re moaning like a dog in a manger

    It’s when that rough god goes riding
    And then the rough god goes gliding
    There’ll be nobody hiding
    When that rough god comes riding on in

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BMU224SONg

  2. Debbie | July 21, 2012 at 2:26 pm

    Congrats!

  3. Richard J Beason, CPA | July 21, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    Very deserving Dan. Congratulations.

  4. Shrillary | July 21, 2012 at 5:50 pm

    Well done Dan…a true wordsmith.

  5. tom | July 21, 2012 at 6:38 pm

    Congratulations! Well done!

  6. Contrasuzie | July 21, 2012 at 9:15 pm

    Well done, good sir! Well done!

  7. Lynda K | July 21, 2012 at 9:57 pm

    Yay, Dan! Much deserved!

  8. John Wilburn | July 21, 2012 at 11:32 pm

    Congratulations. We don’t agree on everything, but you do a bang-up job with the blog and your columns. Well deserved indeed.

  9. dave | July 22, 2012 at 1:31 am

    Congrats Dan. And by the way, a great Sunday column!

  10. Bill Perdue | July 22, 2012 at 7:11 am

    Congrats Dan!

  11. Suzie | July 22, 2012 at 7:28 am

    This is what it’s all about for liberal ‘journalists’. They sit around and give each other meaningless awards. The only award that means anything is the number you write on Line 22, and the fewer people that know about it, the better.

  12. Suzie | July 22, 2012 at 7:35 am

    But the blog has been very good the last couple of months. When freedom of expression is allowed, that’s all anyone can ask.

  13. Kristen | July 22, 2012 at 10:18 am

    Congrats, Dan! Guess what all you people who write in whining about Dan and how the RT should fire him…..not. Happening. He’s the beat-known writer they have.

  14. Sandi Saunders | July 22, 2012 at 11:43 am

    Yeah those “meaningless awards” are all for the birds…till your high holy beefbutt has a bust placed somewhere and then the accolades are well deserved. You are as transparent as you are pitiful. No wonder you like the hate spewing on the blog lately. Like a cat with cream, you are lapping it up. Such a wellspring of hate is so attractive.

  15. dave | July 22, 2012 at 12:00 pm

    I have never seen a better summary of the Romney/Republican philosophy of life and governance than this one provided by our very own Suzie:

    The only award that means anything is the number you write on Line 22, and the fewer people that know about it, the better.

    Comment by Suzie — July 22, 2012 @ 7:28 am

    This is sad on so many levels. It is positive confirmation that the corporate shills who profess to be patriots and who attempt to convince us of their undying Christian faith actually only worship one God–Mammon.
    And they have but one loyalty, the one to tbeir bank accounts.

    The America that I live in and believe in, and the one that I think the vast majority of our citizens believe in doesn’t resemble that warped and twisted view in any way.

    Our only hope is that the people who are being used by these cynical
    plutocrats through wedege driven social issues in an effort to seize and maintain their power will wake up in time, understand that they are being used and reject the destructive philosophy.

  16. Contrasuzie | July 22, 2012 at 12:49 pm

    In Screwzie’s effort to be more like Jesus, she posts NO sentiments of well-wishing for Dan’s Mother, but can’t help but make a disparaging remark about Dan’s award. Jesus is proud of her, I’m sure.

  17. Suzie | July 22, 2012 at 1:53 pm

    Yeah those “meaningless awards” are all for the birds…till your high holy beefbutt has a bust placed somewhere and then the accolades are well deserved.

    Trust me, sweetcakes, I don’t need anybody to tell us we did a good job. The bottom line told us that. And again, the fewer people who know that, the better.

  18. Warren | July 22, 2012 at 2:32 pm

    #11: “The only award that means anything is the number you write on Line 22, and the fewer people that know about it, the better.”

    That bleak philosophy would explain why Rmoney doesn’t want anyone, perhaps including the IRS, to know the depth of his money lust.

    It also means that the poster doesn’t believe these awards mean anything:

    Presidential Medal of Freedom
    Purple Heart
    Medal of Honor
    Congressional Gold Medal
    Nobel Prize in Medicine
    Nobel Prize in Physics
    Clara Barton Award
    Fields Award
    Hokie Golden Lunch Pail
    Etc.

    The poster’s opinion that one’s money pile is an “award”, and the only “award” that matters, was given without any qualifiers. Being an unsolicited post, the poster had unlimited time to compose it for accuracy, unlike spontaneous remarks. Thus, no amendment of the poster’s claim can be considered valid, unless the poster concedes that the original claim was wrong, and details both how the elective claim was wrong, and why.

    In time, all trolls shoot themselves. Some, like poster #11, are public suicides.

  19. John Wilburn | July 22, 2012 at 3:16 pm

    Contrasuzie:

    16.”In Screwzie’s effort to be more like Jesus…”

    So Suzie, do you think Jesus was a white man? Yet another question I doubt she’ll answer.

    “The only award that means anything is the number you write on Line 22, and the fewer people that know about it, the better.”

    And keeping to yourself is why you’re constantly throwing it out there to try to impress us?

  20. Debbie | July 22, 2012 at 3:56 pm

    The love of money is the root of all evil. Thus we have Suzie.

  21. Chuck | July 22, 2012 at 4:13 pm

    Congratulations on being recognized for the success of your column Dan, even though I’m sure you know that you didn’t do that. Somebeody else did that.

  22. gdad | July 22, 2012 at 5:48 pm

    Good job, Dan, especially since you brought out suzie’s jealousy of you yet again.

  23. Suzie | July 22, 2012 at 6:44 pm

    This is sad on so many levels. It is positive confirmation that the corporate shills who profess to be patriots and who attempt to convince us of their undying Christian faith actually only worship one God–Mammon.
    And they have but one loyalty, the one to tbeir bank accounts.

    The America that I live in and believe in, and the one that I think the vast majority of our citizens believe in doesn’t resemble that warped and twisted view in any way.

    Read what the posts are saying. I said I don’t want awards at all. I don’t need public recognition to tell me how well we do our job; our bottom line tells us that. But awards are different from accomplishments. I am proud of our philanthropic accomplishments. But I certainly don’t want or need recognition for them.

  24. Suzie | July 22, 2012 at 6:44 pm

    Congratulations on being recognized for the success of your column Dan, even though I’m sure you know that you didn’t do that. Somebeody else did that.

    LOL. Good one, Chuck.

  25. Suzie | July 22, 2012 at 6:46 pm

    And keeping to yourself is why you’re constantly throwing it out there to try to impress us?

    Actually, that’s not so. As an anonymous person, I throw it out there to be instructive. If I were to give my name, then announce how much I made, that would be completely different.

  26. Kristen | July 22, 2012 at 8:23 pm

    Yeah Suzie, I’m sure your bottom line is a big, big secret. From everyone.

  27. dave | July 22, 2012 at 9:00 pm

    Suzie@23

    I am proud of our philanthropic accomplishments. But I certainly don’t want or need recognition for them.

    Comment by Suzie — July 22, 2012 @ 6:44

    Sure. That’s why you contantly brag about your supposed selective philanthropy all the time on this blog. What a modest, unassunming, generoous, warm-spirited person you are. And I’m the King of England.

  28. gdad | July 22, 2012 at 11:06 pm

    #21 Why, Chuck, I’m sure Dan does in fact know he didn’t do it by himself. Way back when he had some good teachers and parents. Past mentors and bosses helped him sharpen his prose and observation skills. The RT hired him and then gave him a shot at writing a column, including allowing him to say some things that probably bring some heat down every now and then. Every column gets a the eye of an editor or two who no doubt makes at least some of them better.

    So, Chuck, if you were being serious, congrats on getting the point. If you were being sarcastic, you missed.

  29. gdad | July 22, 2012 at 11:08 pm

    #21 Oh and, Chyuck, only a useless troll like suzie would have congratulated you like you had come up with some incredibly insightful barb.

  30. Dan Casey | July 22, 2012 at 11:18 pm

    Chuck, I didn’t do it alone. I had great parents, teachers, mentors, and some great acid, too. All of those were ingredients to my success.

  31. gdad | July 23, 2012 at 9:08 am

    #30 Sorry I forgot to mention the acid, Dan.

  32. K | July 23, 2012 at 9:17 am

    “The only award that means anything is the number you write on Line 22,”

    yep, keep on worshipping that $

  33. John Wilburn | July 23, 2012 at 1:13 pm

    Suzie, are you coming to the bloggers’ get together? I can’t speak for everyone, but I have no intention of treating you rudely. Your fictitious personality here is fair game, but face-to-face I bet you’re more civil and I will reciprocate if so.

  34. Uptheriver | July 23, 2012 at 1:24 pm

    @30 – However without YOU, this award isn’t given. YOU did earn and YOU did build that. And YOU alone earned it. Your teachers didn’t, your parents didn’t, your mentors didn’t and acid didn’t. YOU did.

  35. TBell | July 23, 2012 at 2:13 pm

    Congrats Dan!

  36. Lynda K | July 24, 2012 at 9:21 am

    John Wilburn writes: “Suzie, are you coming to the bloggers’ get together?”

    Is there seriously a bloggers get-together? When and where?

  37. Miriam | July 24, 2012 at 9:31 am

    @33 I concur with John W., please come show us your stunningly lovely face at the get together Suzie. I promise to look very ordinary next to you (and be civil). So, are you going to attend?

    Oh, and I just wanted to clarify Suzie, that if we follow the logic of your post @11, then beauty pageant awards are also meaningless, correct? Along with Warren’s eloquent list @18.

  38. Miriam | July 24, 2012 at 9:32 am

    Oh, and grats Dan.

  39. Miriam | July 24, 2012 at 10:00 am

    @Lynda K – We are getting together on August 19th. The details will be coming shortly (by the end of next week). Please email me at themiriam@comcast.net as I’ve created a list of everyone who wants to attend and will get info to everyone soon.

  40. Miriam | July 24, 2012 at 10:03 am

    Also, and Dan may disagree with this and that’s fine, I don’t find it a wise idea to just publish on the blog when/where etc. we are meeting because the bottom line is that any ole person who isn’t even involved with the blog community could show up and ruin it. So folks who are sincerely interested in meeting everyone can take the extra step and email me. That’s my opinion.

  41. John Wilburn | July 24, 2012 at 10:34 am

    Miriam:

    “…any ole person who isn’t even involved with the blog community could show up and ruin it.”

    Sadly, it’s the people who ARE involved with the blog who are most likely to ruin it.
    :)

    Suzie, you’d better bring Pflugrad!

  42. Kristen | July 24, 2012 at 12:04 pm

    Miriam, that would be one intrepid soul.

  43. John Wilburn | July 24, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    Kristen:

    42.”Miriam, that would be one intrepid soul.”

    No kidding! They’d have a better chance jumping into a piranha tank.

  44. Kristen | July 24, 2012 at 4:14 pm

    JohnW, I’m sure we’d scare away a lot more people than we’d attract. :)

  45. gdad | July 24, 2012 at 4:26 pm

    #12 suzie, you’ve mentioned more than once that your posts aren’t being deleted lately. What you don’t mention is that this coincided almost exactly with when you stopped calling our president a certain racist name and when Dan suggested that the rest of the posters not mention your use of that certain insult any more to see if you would stop. Mighty coincidental, eh?

    Anyway, we’re quite aware that any “censorship” (which wasn’t really censorship at all) you were suffering was your fault and nobody else’s.

  46. Chuck | July 25, 2012 at 9:42 pm

    Take a Geritol and calm down gdad. It was a joke. A light-hearted jab said with good-natured intent. I disagree with Dan most of the time, but obviously I enjoy reading his columns, or I wouldn’t do it with any frequency at all.

    I also realize the disingenuous folly of taking lines out of context and using them for political gain. Unfortunately it usually works because most partisans on either side of the aisle are so blinded by their unthinking devotion to their own demagoguery, that they will leap at any opportunity to assail the other side. Now before you get to feeling to proud of yourself or too much like Obama has been martyred, I will point out again that your side did the exact same thing a few weeks back with Romney’s “I’m not concerned about the very poor” remark.

    In any event, I’ll take your praise/criticism and afford it all the credence it is due and file it away somewhere below Suzie’s. (That was another witty jab incase you missed it)

Error submitting comment

Name is required

A valid email is required (test@test.com)

Comment is required

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published.
All fields are required to comment.

processing

Monday, May 20, 2013

Weather Journal

Soupiness eases a bit

Mon, 20 May 2013 05:22:51 +0000

About this blog

    Metro Columnist Dan Casey knows a little bit about a lot of things but not a heck of a lot about most things. That doesn't keep him from writing about them, however. So keep him honest!

    He welcomes your rants, raves and considered opinions, so long as the language is civil (i.e. no four-letter words). He'll read all your posts and may or may not respond.

    RSS feed


.....Daily Deal.....



Recent Comments

  • Ron May: College presidents have a multitude of skills or they wouldn’t hold the positions they hold. The...
  • Cold n P: CNN poll, Obama still has a job approve rating of 53%. Good job tea baggers! Keep focusing on these smoke a...
  • Ron May: Yes Ernie, as a historian I recall how difficult it was for John Adams. Politics has never been like patty...
  • Dave Hicks: Re: wayne goodman | May 19, 2013 at 2:12 pm “As the law stands, abuses by those shadow groups...
  • Leon: J.M. White | May 19, 2013 at 1:12 pm Clarification: Other than his law history, that is. But they’re all good...

Categories

Archives