Basically, suzie has gone bonkers after being totally humiliated over her election predictions. It’s a sad, sad thing to watch.

This one gives me a chuckle every time I read it. Art Hill said the same thing. Does anybody really think the RT needs a reason to ban anyone?

But I already answered his question. If they stole votes in Philly as he agreed, and we proved they stole it in Chicago, Cleveland, Miami, and Roanoke, why wouldn’t they steal it in every Democrat precinct in America? Only a fool would think Philadelphia was the only place

Comment by Sandi Saunders — November 21, 2012 @ 9:16 pm

Nah, Sandi. She’s been complaining about lack of civility, while putting up her post-election front of “genuine concern” for the nation. I was civil and gave her more than a fair chance to illustrate what she’s been blathering incessantly about since Nov. 7. She wants to play games instead. I was merely doling out the rope, so to speak. I just wanted to see how long it would for Suzie to expose herself as just a less nasty version of the same old troll.

I knew that she didn’t possess the intellect to lay out a plausible case for the election turning in Romney’s favor. Almost everyone else in her party has moved on from this “issue”. Casting doubts upon 3,000 or even 30,000 votes is easily achievable in any election, but attempting to do it with 3,000,000 is a futile act. Human beings are neither random nor evenly dispersed, therefore you cannot extrapolate data from one segment of a population and apply it everywhere.

It was a simple yet daunting task, I know. The offer to listen and debate it is still open, of course. I’m being more than generous by accepting a dubious and plainly immaterial methodology as the fundamental piece for her theory, with even further concessions as to which states are in play. I’m genuinely interested to see if she has the capability to work out the math and make it logically applicable.

Whether she’s got her good-girl undies on for the holidays or if she’s on better behavior for Dan’s upcoming meeting about the blog, this is the Suzie we have now. Personally, I think she’s a lot more boring, even if her opinions and obsessions have gotten a bit more whacked. It’s like she’s dosed on Xanax or something. Still irrational and illogical… just more subdued.

Sure. Just sweep the fraud under the rug. Did you people do that after 2000 after you made up voter fraud charges?

But even being generous, the chances are essentially zero.