Note from Dan: Nobody on this blog more loudly and confidently predicted Barack Obama’s certain loss in the 2012 election than Suzie, the flagrantly wrong and conservative regular here. For that reason, I thought it would be interesting to look back at a few of her doozies, and I’m indebted to Dave Hicks for collecting them and passing them along in an email. All of them are linked below. Dave writes: “So, hozabout a review of merely a small sample of her losing claims / epic failures / severe self-flagellation / unbroken string of losses over the past year and a half?”
Thanks, Dave! Enjoy, everybody!
“I can’t wait until after Romney’s landslide win to repost a whole bunch of quotes from you clowns. I’m saving them and categorizing them to pull out at the appropriate times. It should be great fun.”
–Comment by Suzie — Aug. 26, 2012, 2:28 p.m.
“Obama blinked on the tax increase demands. He’s officially history. WoooHOOOO!”
–Comment by Suzie July 26, 2011, 5:34 p.m.
“For Dan’s next contest, I suggest “Possible occupations for Obama after January, 2013″
My entry: Capitol Hill shoeshine boy for the new GOP majority.”
–Comment by Suzie, July 30, 2011, 4:44 p.m.
“Lord knows he has nothing to lose. He knows he has no chance at re-election. And history has shown he doesn’t care what happens to his party when it comes to advancing his socialist agenda. A desperate man like this might do a General Sherman. Slash and burn and damn the consequences.
As his situation gets more dire, I look for 0bama to lose it one day soon, a la Howard Dean.”
–Comment by Suzie, July 31, 2011, 9:53 a.m.
“Obama now trailing all GOP contenders on generic ballot by 9%. Need any more proof Idiot Boy’s toast?”
–Comment by Suzie, Aug. 3, 2011, 10:46 a.m.
“ROFL. Those two [Bachmann or Perry ] are the Dems’ worst nightmare. Perhaps y’all should be assessing the risk factor of the Dems running Mr. 39%, the worst president in American history.”
–Comment by Suzie, Aug. 15, 2011, 5:08 p.m.
“I wonder if the liberal meda [sic] which made such a big deal about 0bama being “historic” because he was black will made a big deal about Bachmann being historic for being the first woman if she wins the nomination.
Somehow I think that will be glossed over.”
–Comment by Suzie, Aug. 21, 2011, 9:27 a.m.
“Obama might get a job shining shoes next fall or maybe return to his former job of selling ice cream. Life sucks when you’re kicked down to the lower rungs of the economy you’ve created, doesn’t it?
And then what happens if Moochele is forced to return all the items she ‘borrowed?’ I envision hard times for the 0bamas. Maybe the MSM can pass the hat for them.”
–Comment by Suzie, Sept. 14, 2011, 9:31 a.m.
“Still think your Idiot Boy would have a prayer against Perry, Bachmann or Palin?
Maybe your time would be better spent not attacking Rick Perry and tending your own back yard.”
–Comment by Suzie, Sept. 14, 2011, 9:20 a.m.
“Who do y’all have that could beat any our top tier?”
–Comment by Suzie, — Sept. 20, 2011, 10:53 a.m.
“The word is that 0bama will be asked to step aside within the next few weeks. They figure it’s their only sliver of a chance to retain a few seats in Congress —in other words they’ve already written off the presidential election.
Their hope (and ours) is that 0bama refuses to leave. Then they are stuck with that albatross. I’m thinking he is far too vain to give it up.
This is REALLY going to be fun!”
–Comment by Suzie, Sept. 20, 2011, 11:00 a.m.
“LMAO. Democrats would have a better chance running 90-year-old George McGovern.”
–Comment by Suzie — Oct. 4, 9:51 p.m.
“What leftwingers miss (as usual) is that the GOP is a splintered field with many very strong evenly matched candidates. The fact that four or five of them are either tied or within shouting distance of idiot boy is amazing and probably unprecedented for a sitting president. Once the field is distilled down, that specific GOP candidate will be heavily favored to win, regardless of whom the Democrats end up nominating. Right now Vegas has the unnamed GOP nominee favored to win.”
–Comment by Suzie, Oct. 5, 2011, 7:19 p.m.
“Debbie is quoting a bunch of liberals, as if their opinion of the GOP field means squat. There are so many extraordinary candidates, the challenge is finding the best one. It’s like picking between Magic, Byrd, Jordan, and Kobe. Who the Democrats end up nominating is also uncertain, but it won’t matter.”
–Comment by Suzie, Oct. 9, 2011, 8:43 a.m.
“Not the Tea Party members. They’re are all safe. They’re the only ones doing the job they were elected to do. Like last year, the MSM will be misnaming the Democrat whitewash “anti-incumbency.”
–Comment by Suzie, Nov. 21, 2011, 7:52 a.m.
“The landslide loss for the Democrat candidate next year will probably be as crushing than Carter’s because 2012 and 1980 were both represented by a movement.”
–Comment by Suzie, Nov. 30, 2011, 1:24 p.m.
“11 months to the day until the election and the Democrats still don’t have a candidate. Shrillary and Mark Warner have said ‘No thanks’. They know a sinking ship when they see one. I guess the Democrats could turn to their roster of losers; Kerry, Algore, Dukakis, or Mondull. This way they might still salvage 5 states.”
–Comment by Suzie, Dec. 6, 2011, 8:05 a.m.
“Here’s what everyone must remember: This race is over and has been over since the debt ceiling debate. A few liberals have even had the courage to admit as much, notably Pat Caddell.
But a 32-state win and a 4% margin isn’t good enough for me, and that is why I desperately want a strong conservative like Santorum instead of the so-so Romney. If Rick is our nominee, then in addition to fiscal responsibility, the race becomes about good vs. evil, and when morality is on the ballot, conservatives ALWAYS win big. I want a 45-state whitewash and an 8+% margin. I want the SOB and all his socialist crap thoroughly repudiated. THEN Santorum will start taking the steps proven to work to get this economy back on its feet, and as Bush did 11 years ago, restore morality to the White House.”
–Comment by Suzie, Jan. 11. 2012, 11:15 a.m.
“Keep singing yourself this song, liberal pukes. Idiot Boy can’t get of the low 40s. Every incumbent president with those kinds of numbers has gotten blown out. You’re setting yourself up for a stunner in November.”
–Comment by Suzie, Jan. 18, 2012, 5:02 p.m.
“If Santorum wins, 0bama will be lucky to win 5 states. Rick is the only one who articulates true conservationism and has never veered from the path. He’s the one America wants.”
–Comment by Suzie — Feb. 8, 8:04 a.m.
“I look for this blog to clear out this fall after Obama’s landslide win.”
“That’s funny. Even liberal Gallup has Obama trailing by 5, and they’re doing they’re best to help him out.http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx
Face it. NO serious prognosticator thinks Monkey Boy has a prayer. This thing is over and has been for almost a year.”
–Comment by Suzie, April 18, 12:51 p.m.
“So this is terrific. We knew Idiot Boy said goodbye to 10 million votes the minute he picked this fight, but now with the bishops actively engaged, it could cost a him a lot more.
I’m feeling really good about a Romney landslide.”
–Comment by Suzie, May 27, 8:17 p.m.
“Stick a fork in Idiot Boy. He’s done.”
–Comment by Suzie, June 9, 2012, 10:49 p.m.
“Romney will beat the little boy with the big ears at every stop from now on on how he LIED about the huge tax cut on the middle class.”
–Comment by Suzie, June 28, 6:58 p.m.
“Paul Ryan is an outstanding choice for VEEP. Quick as a whip, Tea Party guy. Romney already had the election wrapped up, but this will get the Tea Party even more energized.”
–Comment by Suzie, Aug. 11, 2012, 1:15 p.m.
“Gallup now has Romney up by two nationally (which means he’s up by 9 or 10).
Is crow tasting pretty good for all you libs who predicted Ryan would hurt the ticket?
LOL and BUSTED.”
–Comment by Suzie, Aug. 14, 6:24 p.m.
“Time for bed now, but I agree with Michael Moore for once: Get used to President Romney.”
–Comment by Suzie — Sept. 6, 11:47 p.m.
“The election isn’t close. Romney has a commanding lead and about $100 million more that he’s free to spend now that the conventions are over. 0bama got the usual convention bounce of three points. After a week or so, Romney will return to his baseline six-seven point lead and the money will expand it from there.
“Expect the MSM which controls, moderates, then spins the debates to try to help 0bama out, but barring some hugely successful dirty trick, Romney wins in a landslide.”
Comment by Suzie, Sept. 9, 8:08 a.m.
“But Romney will win in a landslide. He looked very presidential in his blasting 0bama’s incompetence and pathetic apology to the Islamic terrorists. Strong moments like that will help him both with the conservative base and with swing voters.”
–Comment by Suzie, Sept. 13, 9:15 a.m.
“Romney will win in a landslide. Nothing has changed. The polls haven’t changed. Neither Gallup nor Rasmussen favors 0bama. Same as before. Yawn.”
–Comment Suzie, Sept. 23, 2012, 3:18 p.m.
“Romney still has more money and is now the better debater, having been through the mill the past two years. He’s going to overcome the MSM hatchet job, and win this thing.”
–Comment by Suzie, Sept. 25, 2012, 8:26 p.m.
“Romney is going to win by 7 which will qualify as a landslide. Whatever polls you clowns are citing are wrong.”
–Comment by Suzie, Oct. 1, 2012, 10:24 p.m.
“Can I just interject sanity in all this nonsense? Let me say the same thing I have been saying months. Romney leads by a significant margin today, as he did yesterday, last week, and last month. Obama was NEVER going to win, was never going to come close.
Romney is going to win in a landslide, and was always going to do so. The only difference is now more people know it.”
–Comment by Suzie, Oct. 9, 2012, 11:59 a.m.
“Let me predict further, ladies and gentlemen, that not only will Romney win in a 6+ point landslide, the GOP will take a minimum of 54 Senate seats. You may mark it down and take it to the bank.”
–Comment by Suzie, Oct. 18, 2012, 11:43 a.m.