Comments on: The ‘Unskewed Polls’ guy who fooled a nation tries again

By: gdad

gdad — Sat, 24 Nov 2012 03:01:48 +0000

#73 “Your refusal to answer is your answer.”

Only in your imaginary world, suzie.

By: gdad

gdad — Sat, 24 Nov 2012 03:00:43 +0000

#75 I don’t think there’s any question that there were right-wing ATTEMPTS at cheating, which failed. And there absolutely were right-wing attempts to disenfranchise legitimate voters.

By: John Wilburn

John Wilburn — Fri, 23 Nov 2012 22:03:43 +0000

Sandi and Kristen, we should ask Dan to create a blog spam folder for any post containing “Alinsky rule”.

By: Art Hill

Art Hill — Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:52:39 +0000

Even if Ohio had gone for Romney, it wouldn’t have mattered. The only “battleground state” he won was North Carolina.

By: Sandi Saunders

Sandi Saunders — Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:30:34 +0000

Excellent question Kristen!

By: Dave Hicks

Dave Hicks — Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:27:54 +0000

Re: Kristen @ 12:04 pm

Exactly my thoughts at the time.

By: Kristen

Kristen — Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:04:59 +0000

Although I should amend my statement. Certainly Rove was remarkably CONFIDENT of Ohio going for Romney – in spite of all polling to the contrary. You have to ask yourself…why on earth did he get so snippy with the Fox election team when they called Ohio for Obama? Why was he so completely convinced Ohio would fall to Romney? What had he put in place and what had been promised to him?
That’s where the real attention should be directed. What did Rove think he knew? He sure seemed disappointed.

By: Kristen

Kristen — Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:27:17 +0000

There was no cheating in the election. The bigger question is how long this blog will continue to be clogged up with this crap.

By: Suzie

Suzie — Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:39:59 +0000

I can’t prove there wasn’t any at all (can’t prove a negative, as you’ve said in the past) any more than you can prove there was some. Draw.

I asked if you believe those counts were legit. Your refusal to answer is your answer.

By: gdad

gdad — Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:30:05 +0000

#70 I’ve already challenged your “logic.” And Dave Hicks absolutely destroyed it. Nuff said. As for cheating in Philly, I can’t prove there wasn’t any at all (can’t prove a negative, as you’ve said in the past) any more than you can prove there was some. Draw.

You’re a stuck record of BS.