Comments on: Bedtime in Coochville: A nightmare for Virginia

By: Sandi Saunders

Sandi Saunders — Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:52:08 +0000

What difference indeed. You all show your colors whether allowed to insult with childish name calling or childish name changing or not. The column is a “reprise”, otherwise known as a rerun, but thanks for chiming in with your daily whine, we would sure hate to miss it.

By: gdad

gdad — Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:45:48 +0000

Cooch.

By: Suzie

Suzie — Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:39:43 +0000

If Dan is to apply the rule consistently, “Cooch” wouldn’t be allowed anymore. Let’s see if it happens.

By: Frank

Frank — Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:21:36 +0000

In my opinion,

…opinion journalist rules are designed to foment the opinion journalist’s bias….as evidenced by dan’s December 7 post titled “Toward a More Civil Discourse”.

Cooch, Obuma, Coochville, Obumaville, what difference does it make? Both are plays on names from folks who make no attempt to hide their bias when posting.

Yet, only “obuma” was established by dan to be considered “the kind of stuff” which apparantly “doesn’t strengthen the debate; it childishly demeans it.”

So, there you have it. Lib opinion journalist establishes biased lib rules which translate to… rules only non-libs need follow. Sheesh.

Yes, it’s your blog, dan, and you make the rules. I promise to follow your example.

And to all in Obumaville and Coochville, may the Spirits of Christmas and this Holiday Season stay with you and yours all through the year.

By: gdad

gdad — Mon, 24 Dec 2012 04:02:35 +0000

“This is proof these rules were made for Suzie only.”

And that’s why Dan has deleted posts by people other than suzie under the rules.

Man, you are SOOOOO easy. But your whining is hysterical.

By: wayne goodman

wayne goodman — Mon, 24 Dec 2012 01:34:45 +0000

Here’s the newest Romney excuse. Running twice, spending 1.5 billion to do it, completely reversing every position you previously held to get the nomination, and running a campaign rife with lies and distortions is clear evidence that he “really didn’t want to run in the first place”.
What kind of ego does it take to run just because you believe that the :country needs you” and only you can save it.?

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/mitt-romney-no-desire-president-tagg-says-191236665–election.html

By: Suzie

Suzie — Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:10:40 +0000

Now you allow others to address me with other names is how post #6 should read.

By: Suzie

Suzie — Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:09:48 +0000

Ho ho ho! The PROOF of this is that I’ve censored her post (NOT!).

You said you wouldn’t allow me to use obama’s name with a zero character and would trash any comment in which I did. You also said we must use other posters’ correct names. Now you allow me to address me with other names.

This is proof these rules were made for Suzie only.

By: Dan Casey

Dan Casey — Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:56:57 +0000

“The goal was to silence conservatives only. That’s always the leftwing (Communist) goal. When they scream ‘civility’, they don’t mean it for themselves.”
–Comment by Suzie

Ho ho ho! The PROOF of this is that I’ve censored her post (NOT!).

OTOH, ultra-fake-sensitivity is characteristic of a mind that’s been warped by unreasonable dogma. And that may be what’s going on here.

By: Suzie

Suzie — Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:49:55 +0000

Yeah, Henry. So far we’ve learned AFTER the Civility Summit, that I must use obama’s correct name and those of the blog’s posters. But they aren’t required to use my correct name or those of public figures.

The goal was to silence conservatives only. That’s always the leftwing (Communist) goal. When they scream ‘civility’, they don’t mean it for themselves.