<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Post of the Day goes after taxpayer-subsidized farms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-goes-after-taxpayer-subsidized-farms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-goes-after-taxpayer-subsidized-farms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:11:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron May</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-goes-after-taxpayer-subsidized-farms/#comment-248889</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=34941#comment-248889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sandi,

They don&#039;t want to keep the &quot;job creators&quot; from creating jobs, don&#039;tcha know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandi,</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t want to keep the &#8220;job creators&#8221; from creating jobs, don&#8217;tcha know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandi Saunders</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-goes-after-taxpayer-subsidized-farms/#comment-248872</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=34941#comment-248872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right on Ron, they never complain about THAT welfare!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Ron, they never complain about THAT welfare!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandi Saunders</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-goes-after-taxpayer-subsidized-farms/#comment-248871</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=34941#comment-248871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Done Mike Scott, thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done Mike Scott, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gdad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-goes-after-taxpayer-subsidized-farms/#comment-248708</link>
		<dc:creator>gdad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 03:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=34941#comment-248708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#12 Right you are, I meant Shrillary. And Henry still didn&#039;t get it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#12 Right you are, I meant Shrillary. And Henry still didn&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Scott</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-goes-after-taxpayer-subsidized-farms/#comment-248659</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 01:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=34941#comment-248659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a topic about which I am passionate and Warren makes the point that our current system maximizes profits by creating a monoculture of genetically engineered crops.  The variety of foodstuffs that we produce has declined dramatically while the ability to create ever greater yields of a fixed set of relatively profitable crops is the current status.  Now, I am not afraid of genetically modified food, but I think nature itself might create some harsh consequences for acre upon acre of plants that essentially cloned.  Variability in nature is the stuff of survival.  

There are other aspects of agribusiness that I find objectionable as well.  If you&#039;ve ever seen a colorado feed lot in which cattle stand ankle deep in their own waste, you would quickly come to question the methods of meat production as well.  Let us not speak of large scale processing methods. Both of these observations made me give up beef for a long period of time in my life.

I don&#039;t know if  Congress is interested in the wholesale overhaul of this system. What I do know is there is a fairly active grass roots move afoot to circumvent the system and to turn toward local producers who provide delicious, fresh and wholesome products and so in a manner that is both sustainable and humane.  Did I mention that what they produce is very high quality stuff.

Here comes the shameless plug. If you are interested in locally produced food:

wwww.roanokevalleylocavore.com

The above links to a directory of about 150  producers of local food. 

And if you want to keep up with the scene on local social media...

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Roanoke-Valley-Locavore/350731487878?ref=hl

Like me on facebook!  I would like to have 1000 likes by January 1st.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a topic about which I am passionate and Warren makes the point that our current system maximizes profits by creating a monoculture of genetically engineered crops.  The variety of foodstuffs that we produce has declined dramatically while the ability to create ever greater yields of a fixed set of relatively profitable crops is the current status.  Now, I am not afraid of genetically modified food, but I think nature itself might create some harsh consequences for acre upon acre of plants that essentially cloned.  Variability in nature is the stuff of survival.  </p>
<p>There are other aspects of agribusiness that I find objectionable as well.  If you&#8217;ve ever seen a colorado feed lot in which cattle stand ankle deep in their own waste, you would quickly come to question the methods of meat production as well.  Let us not speak of large scale processing methods. Both of these observations made me give up beef for a long period of time in my life.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if  Congress is interested in the wholesale overhaul of this system. What I do know is there is a fairly active grass roots move afoot to circumvent the system and to turn toward local producers who provide delicious, fresh and wholesome products and so in a manner that is both sustainable and humane.  Did I mention that what they produce is very high quality stuff.</p>
<p>Here comes the shameless plug. If you are interested in locally produced food:</p>
<p>wwww.roanokevalleylocavore.com</p>
<p>The above links to a directory of about 150  producers of local food. </p>
<p>And if you want to keep up with the scene on local social media&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Roanoke-Valley-Locavore/350731487878?ref=hl" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/pages/Roanoke-Valley-Locavore/350731487878?ref=hl</a></p>
<p>Like me on facebook!  I would like to have 1000 likes by January 1st.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-goes-after-taxpayer-subsidized-farms/#comment-248554</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=34941#comment-248554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#5 Gdad, Henry was referring to Shrillary&#039;s post.

#7 Kristen, I&#039;m sure you&#039;re right. It&#039;s also why they are still receiving the subsidies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#5 Gdad, Henry was referring to Shrillary&#8217;s post.</p>
<p>#7 Kristen, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re right. It&#8217;s also why they are still receiving the subsidies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron May</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-goes-after-taxpayer-subsidized-farms/#comment-248532</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=34941#comment-248532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...totals more than $90 per year.&quot; 

Sorry that should say $90 billion per year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;totals more than $90 per year.&#8221; </p>
<p>Sorry that should say $90 billion per year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron May</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-goes-after-taxpayer-subsidized-farms/#comment-248530</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=34941#comment-248530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl Rosen,

How do you feel about these federal and state subsidies?  You are paying for them too.  

&quot;From 2008 to 2010, the 280 most profitable U.S. corporations sheltered half of their profits from taxes, thanks to tax subsidies totaling nearly $224 billion, according to a 2011 analysis by Citizens for Tax Justice. A dozen large companies, including Exxon-Mobil, Boeing, and General Electric, reaped $175 billion in profits, but their combined tax rate was negative 1.4 percent, thanks to $64 billion in subsidies from oil depletion allowances, write-offs from overseas profits, and other loopholes, according to the study.&quot;

&quot;The highest three-year average effective rate paid by any of the 12 large corporations in the Citizens for Tax Justice study was 14.2 percent—less than many middle class families.&quot;

&quot;Total state and local tax subsidies to business add up to about $70 billion a year.&quot; These subsidies didn&#039;t just come about by accident—at least 30 Fortune 500 firms pay their lobbyists more than they pay in taxes.&quot;

The source for my data is below.  Federal subsidies to business, via tax breaks or direct subsidies, totals more than $90 per year.  Eliminating them would save $900 billion over ten years.  That is a start on solving the budget deficit issue.  

The only &quot;entitlement programs&quot; the Republicans want to talk about is Social Security, Medicare &amp; Medicaid.  I think that if we want to trim Social security, Medicare &amp; Medicaid we need to cut corporate welfare first.  

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2012/04/05/how-everyone-else-pays-for-big-businesss-tax-breaks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl Rosen,</p>
<p>How do you feel about these federal and state subsidies?  You are paying for them too.  </p>
<p>&#8220;From 2008 to 2010, the 280 most profitable U.S. corporations sheltered half of their profits from taxes, thanks to tax subsidies totaling nearly $224 billion, according to a 2011 analysis by Citizens for Tax Justice. A dozen large companies, including Exxon-Mobil, Boeing, and General Electric, reaped $175 billion in profits, but their combined tax rate was negative 1.4 percent, thanks to $64 billion in subsidies from oil depletion allowances, write-offs from overseas profits, and other loopholes, according to the study.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The highest three-year average effective rate paid by any of the 12 large corporations in the Citizens for Tax Justice study was 14.2 percent—less than many middle class families.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Total state and local tax subsidies to business add up to about $70 billion a year.&#8221; These subsidies didn&#8217;t just come about by accident—at least 30 Fortune 500 firms pay their lobbyists more than they pay in taxes.&#8221;</p>
<p>The source for my data is below.  Federal subsidies to business, via tax breaks or direct subsidies, totals more than $90 per year.  Eliminating them would save $900 billion over ten years.  That is a start on solving the budget deficit issue.  </p>
<p>The only &#8220;entitlement programs&#8221; the Republicans want to talk about is Social Security, Medicare &amp; Medicaid.  I think that if we want to trim Social security, Medicare &amp; Medicaid we need to cut corporate welfare first.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2012/04/05/how-everyone-else-pays-for-big-businesss-tax-breaks" rel="nofollow">http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2012/04/05/how-everyone-else-pays-for-big-businesss-tax-breaks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-goes-after-taxpayer-subsidized-farms/#comment-248525</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=34941#comment-248525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another aspect, and possibly the worst, of big corporate agri-business is the way it can lead to dangerous limitations in crop bio-diversity. The most egregious current example is genetically engineered seed of staple crops, which are used to eliminate other types of these staples with Wal-Mart type ruthlessness. Monsanto’s seed monopoly has grown so powerful that they control the genetics of nearly 90% of five major commodity crops including corn, soybeans, cotton, canola and sugar beets.

This also goes to the &quot;conservative&quot; SCOTUS rulings that allow for virtually unlimited private control and commercial exploitation of genetics, which could become a harbinger of issues on the control of human genotypes.

http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_16844.cfm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another aspect, and possibly the worst, of big corporate agri-business is the way it can lead to dangerous limitations in crop bio-diversity. The most egregious current example is genetically engineered seed of staple crops, which are used to eliminate other types of these staples with Wal-Mart type ruthlessness. Monsanto’s seed monopoly has grown so powerful that they control the genetics of nearly 90% of five major commodity crops including corn, soybeans, cotton, canola and sugar beets.</p>
<p>This also goes to the &#8220;conservative&#8221; SCOTUS rulings that allow for virtually unlimited private control and commercial exploitation of genetics, which could become a harbinger of issues on the control of human genotypes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_16844.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_16844.cfm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandi Saunders</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-goes-after-taxpayer-subsidized-farms/#comment-248519</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=34941#comment-248519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;“Why is it that if you take advantage of a tax deduction, you’re a smart businessman, but if you take advantage of a program that feeds you when you’re hungry, you’re a moocher?”&lt;/em&gt; Jon Stewart]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“Why is it that if you take advantage of a tax deduction, you’re a smart businessman, but if you take advantage of a program that feeds you when you’re hungry, you’re a moocher?”</em> Jon Stewart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
