Comments on: The Post of the Day says ‘Don’t Postpone Joy’ http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-says-dont-postpone-joy/ Thu, 23 May 2013 05:44:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: J.M. White http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-says-dont-postpone-joy/#comment-252112 J.M. White Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:03:49 +0000 http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35091#comment-252112 Statis[t]ically, it is impossible for one candidate to win 100% of the vote in over 100 precincts that average over 200 voters.

False. Try a statement that doesn’t reflect your overwhelming bias and has the tiniest bit of, you know, truth. It mat be improbable but it is most certainly not impossible. I’m just positively positive you’ll make the appropriate correction/retraction at any moment now.

]]> By: Suzie http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-says-dont-postpone-joy/#comment-252017 Suzie Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:52:29 +0000 http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35091#comment-252017 I realize that sheltered and supposedly pampered lives like yours do not realize there are precincts where minorities, Democrats or even right wingers make up 100% of the voters.

The precincts that went 100% for Romney were very small. I found three. All in Utah. Romney won 14-0. 14-0, and 17-0. The difference between the candidates was only 3.7%. Statisically, it is impossible for one candidate to win 100% of the vote in over 100 precincts that average over 200 voters. You’re too smart to believe that. So why do you waste time pretending Democrats didn’t cheat out the wazoo?

]]> By: Sandi Saunders http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-says-dont-postpone-joy/#comment-251931 Sandi Saunders Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:40:27 +0000 http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35091#comment-251931 No, you do not refuse to do that at all. It is a rather commonplace event. And once again, a precinct is not a district, or a county. I realize that sheltered and supposedly pampered lives like yours do not realize there are precincts where minorities, Democrats or even right wingers make up 100% of the voters. It is however a reality and you will either have to come to grips with it, or continue to squander whatever point you ever hope to make with anyone not already high on the same delusion.

]]> By: gdad http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-says-dont-postpone-joy/#comment-251307 gdad Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:35:29 +0000 http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35091#comment-251307 “You’re asking me to lie, Dave H., and I refuse to do that. ”

Translation: I’m not giving up my trolling ways.

]]> By: Suzie http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-says-dont-postpone-joy/#comment-251219 Suzie Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:15:30 +0000 http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35091#comment-251219 IMHO, Suzie acknowledging that she was wrong about the election both before (as to who would win) and after (as in agreeing that it was lost not stolen) would be the first sign of turned over a new leaf.

You’re asking me to lie, Dave H., and I refuse to do that. And anybody who thinks over 100 districts in battleground states going 100% for 0bama isn’t evidence of stealing an election is either lying or very gullible.

]]> By: Dave Hicks http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-says-dont-postpone-joy/#comment-251093 Dave Hicks Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:08:33 +0000 http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35091#comment-251093 Re: J.M. White @ 8:51 am

IMHO, Suzie acknowledging that she was wrong about the election both before (as to who would win) and after (as in agreeing that it was lost not stolen) would be the first sign of turned over a new leaf.

For the new Suzie persona, see Proverbs 16:18 and Matthew 3:2

FWIIW, I neither made a prediction about the election nor made a bet on it. So, I don’t have motive in this issue.

]]> By: John Wilburn http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-says-dont-postpone-joy/#comment-251088 John Wilburn Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:31:44 +0000 http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35091#comment-251088 Suzie:

“What does posting “under my real name” have to do with the validity of my point?”

Because if you choose to lie or profess the absurd, there are no real life ramifications. You only get ONE real life identity, so you are far less likely to tie things to it that will damage your credibility to it.

Sandi, J.M., Dave Gresham, I, and seveal others post under our real names and, by doing so, kick the safety net and ability to have a do-over out from under us if we were to say something damaging. That in itself does give us a credibility and respect that you do not have. You would have more credibility instantly if you were a verifiable, identifiable person.

]]> By: Suzie http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-says-dont-postpone-joy/#comment-251079 Suzie Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:04:39 +0000 http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35091#comment-251079 Don’t postpone joy

The Walden interlude may have been pleasant, but it is a selfish existence, and as such can never bring lasting joy. True joy is only accomplished in the service of others.

]]> By: Suzie http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-says-dont-postpone-joy/#comment-251073 Suzie Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:51:55 +0000 http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35091#comment-251073 JM White.

When are you going to understand your opinion on my ‘credibility’ is meaningless to me?

]]> By: J.M. White http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2012/12/the-post-of-the-day-says-dont-postpone-joy/#comment-251066 J.M. White Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:38:14 +0000 http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35091#comment-251066 “I’ve always considered what goes on in here sort of a game.”

Credibility.
You have none.
That’s why.

]]>