<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Patrick Henry High School alum addresses Congress!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/a-patrick-henry-high-school-alum-address-congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/a-patrick-henry-high-school-alum-address-congress/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike o</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/a-patrick-henry-high-school-alum-address-congress/#comment-279147</link>
		<dc:creator>mike o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 22:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=36071#comment-279147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan, re: 6:50
I see you still prefer pointless personal pithy  retorts as opposed to true debate]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, re: 6:50<br />
I see you still prefer pointless personal pithy  retorts as opposed to true debate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike o</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/a-patrick-henry-high-school-alum-address-congress/#comment-279146</link>
		<dc:creator>mike o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 22:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=36071#comment-279146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hilary, 
The FBI stats don’t meld with the CDC stats, but let’s use your numbers.  
The CDC says 19k suicides are by guns the #1 way people  off themselves.  Second is “suffocation” hanging being most popular.  Followed by poisoning.  
Are you suggesting that if someone wants to commit suicide, and there is not a firearm around they will just change their mind?
Let’s assume that all guns disappeared then the number one cause would be hanging, do we then get rid of rope???

Regarding “all over Europe”, you might want to narrow your geography before you suggest low incidence of violence on that continent.  Many of those folks would rather hack one to death with a machete than use a firearm, and hundreds of thousands are not around to verify that fact.  

I too watched “cartoons” during my childhood, and still get a bit of a laugh when Wile’s latest ACME device proves unsuccessful.  For you to compare that with some of the video games out today, suggests you might be out of touch with what is going on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilary,<br />
The FBI stats don’t meld with the CDC stats, but let’s use your numbers.<br />
The CDC says 19k suicides are by guns the #1 way people  off themselves.  Second is “suffocation” hanging being most popular.  Followed by poisoning.<br />
Are you suggesting that if someone wants to commit suicide, and there is not a firearm around they will just change their mind?<br />
Let’s assume that all guns disappeared then the number one cause would be hanging, do we then get rid of rope???</p>
<p>Regarding “all over Europe”, you might want to narrow your geography before you suggest low incidence of violence on that continent.  Many of those folks would rather hack one to death with a machete than use a firearm, and hundreds of thousands are not around to verify that fact.  </p>
<p>I too watched “cartoons” during my childhood, and still get a bit of a laugh when Wile’s latest ACME device proves unsuccessful.  For you to compare that with some of the video games out today, suggests you might be out of touch with what is going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/a-patrick-henry-high-school-alum-address-congress/#comment-278644</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=36071#comment-278644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought we didn&#039;t concern ourselves with accidents. So what relevance do car accidents have anyway?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought we didn&#8217;t concern ourselves with accidents. So what relevance do car accidents have anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike o</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/a-patrick-henry-high-school-alum-address-congress/#comment-278635</link>
		<dc:creator>mike o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=36071#comment-278635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan, re: 5:44
Wow, I gave you much more credit on understanding issues than your response implies.  If you are so naïve to believe that someone would “cross just for a (pack) of cigs.”  Nothing more need to be said of your understanding of the issue.

Apparently you failed/choose to understand the “true” message of my post (even where I might agree with you).  
I am not surprised nor disappointed by your actions.   It is to be expected from one who takes his direction from “above” without personal thought or consideration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, re: 5:44<br />
Wow, I gave you much more credit on understanding issues than your response implies.  If you are so naïve to believe that someone would “cross just for a (pack) of cigs.”  Nothing more need to be said of your understanding of the issue.</p>
<p>Apparently you failed/choose to understand the “true” message of my post (even where I might agree with you).<br />
I am not surprised nor disappointed by your actions.   It is to be expected from one who takes his direction from “above” without personal thought or consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandi Saunders</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/a-patrick-henry-high-school-alum-address-congress/#comment-278634</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=36071#comment-278634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The purpose of a car is to transport a person from point A to point B and back.  The purpose of a gun is to deliver a deadly bullet to the target.  No comparison.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purpose of a car is to transport a person from point A to point B and back.  The purpose of a gun is to deliver a deadly bullet to the target.  No comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Casey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/a-patrick-henry-high-school-alum-address-congress/#comment-278629</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 23:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=36071#comment-278629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t look now but I think mikeO&#039;s arrogant, know-it-all attitude just got himself owned again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t look now but I think mikeO&#8217;s arrogant, know-it-all attitude just got himself owned again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/a-patrick-henry-high-school-alum-address-congress/#comment-278605</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 23:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=36071#comment-278605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment by mike o — February 1, 2013 @ 5:26 pm 
&quot;Now if you really want to curb the death toll in America, you should “outlaw” cars. Do you know how many tens of thousands die each year from those vehicles of destruction???
Simplistic liberal thinking never ceases to amaze me.&quot;


Ummmm - mike o -according to the national Center for Disease Control, 
GUNS actually kill more people than motor vehicle accidents.

The 2010 statistics are as follows -
TOTAL MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT DEATHS = 35,332 deaths 

There were 606 gun accidental deaths, 
19,392 gun suicides, and, 
16,259 homicides, 
TOTAL DEATHS CAUSED BY GUNS = of 36,257

and regarding watching violent videos/games - All over Europe the same &quot;violent&quot; videos are watched and played and the level of gun violence doesn&#039;t come close to the US.  Could it be better gun regulations?

BTW I grew up watching anvils being dropped on Road Runner [beep beep] by Wile E Coyote...and I swear I have never attempted to drop an anvil on anyone - ever!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by mike o — February 1, 2013 @ 5:26 pm<br />
&#8220;Now if you really want to curb the death toll in America, you should “outlaw” cars. Do you know how many tens of thousands die each year from those vehicles of destruction???<br />
Simplistic liberal thinking never ceases to amaze me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ummmm &#8211; mike o -according to the national Center for Disease Control,<br />
GUNS actually kill more people than motor vehicle accidents.</p>
<p>The 2010 statistics are as follows -<br />
TOTAL MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT DEATHS = 35,332 deaths </p>
<p>There were 606 gun accidental deaths,<br />
19,392 gun suicides, and,<br />
16,259 homicides,<br />
TOTAL DEATHS CAUSED BY GUNS = of 36,257</p>
<p>and regarding watching violent videos/games &#8211; All over Europe the same &#8220;violent&#8221; videos are watched and played and the level of gun violence doesn&#8217;t come close to the US.  Could it be better gun regulations?</p>
<p>BTW I grew up watching anvils being dropped on Road Runner [beep beep] by Wile E Coyote&#8230;and I swear I have never attempted to drop an anvil on anyone &#8211; ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Casey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/a-patrick-henry-high-school-alum-address-congress/#comment-278592</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 22:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=36071#comment-278592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;&quot;Dan, re: 5:56
Do you actually think about this stuff before you type? Assuming you are correct on your MD tax numbers, did you consider that folks might be going to surrounding states to get their smokes? Or did you miss the entire premise of my post on VA attempting to regulate this type of activity?

You and your minions suggest measures that may not “eliminate every last bit of behavior that it seeks to discourage” given your suggestions and looking at facts the real question is what are you trying to discourage? if it is to “discourage” legal gun use you might be on the right track. (Like JM said he shoots 10k rounds and it would cost him an extra 200 bucks/yr; to some that might make the sport less affordable.)&quot; &lt;/em&gt;
--Comment by mikeO

mikeO, at the time the increase was added, it didn&#039;t take the increase too much higher than Delaware or Pa (which were already higher than Md before the increase). I realize Virginia also is a border state with MD, but there&#039;s only two bridges across the Potomac (and 1 ferry) and all three are a huge pain in the ass to cross just for a pack of cigs. DC already was higher, too.

With regard to a national 2-cents per bullet tax, tell us what country you believe bullet buyers will flock to to avoid the tax.

Canada? Ho ho.

Mexico? Ha ha.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Dan, re: 5:56<br />
Do you actually think about this stuff before you type? Assuming you are correct on your MD tax numbers, did you consider that folks might be going to surrounding states to get their smokes? Or did you miss the entire premise of my post on VA attempting to regulate this type of activity?</p>
<p>You and your minions suggest measures that may not “eliminate every last bit of behavior that it seeks to discourage” given your suggestions and looking at facts the real question is what are you trying to discourage? if it is to “discourage” legal gun use you might be on the right track. (Like JM said he shoots 10k rounds and it would cost him an extra 200 bucks/yr; to some that might make the sport less affordable.)&#8221; </em><br />
&#8211;Comment by mikeO</p>
<p>mikeO, at the time the increase was added, it didn&#8217;t take the increase too much higher than Delaware or Pa (which were already higher than Md before the increase). I realize Virginia also is a border state with MD, but there&#8217;s only two bridges across the Potomac (and 1 ferry) and all three are a huge pain in the ass to cross just for a pack of cigs. DC already was higher, too.</p>
<p>With regard to a national 2-cents per bullet tax, tell us what country you believe bullet buyers will flock to to avoid the tax.</p>
<p>Canada? Ho ho.</p>
<p>Mexico? Ha ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike o</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/a-patrick-henry-high-school-alum-address-congress/#comment-278586</link>
		<dc:creator>mike o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 22:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=36071#comment-278586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan, re: 5:56
Do you actually think about this stuff before you type?  Assuming you are correct on your MD tax numbers, did you consider that folks might be going to surrounding states to get their smokes? Or did you miss the entire premise of my post on VA attempting to regulate this type of activity?

You and your minions suggest measures that may not “eliminate every last bit of behavior that it seeks to discourage”  given your suggestions and looking at facts the real question is what are you trying to discourage?  if it is to “discourage” legal gun use you might be on the right track.  (Like JM  said he shoots 10k rounds and it would cost him an extra 200 bucks/yr; to some that might make the sport less affordable.)  

If it is to “discourage” mental cases from killing people you are far afield.  Do you really think the mental case cares if it costs him another 2 bucks for his hundred rounds to shoot people?  Maybe you believe he might think twice because he won’t be able to afford his starbucks coffee after his “spree”…
If you really wanted to curb the problem of “mental cases” commiting crimes, I would suggest looking at how to reduce the “mental cases”.  Have these people become desensitized from the violence in video games/movies?  (it seems the newtown nut spent most of his time playing violent video).  I know this is not near as sexy or popular to the left as gun issues, but are you looking for an issue or a solution?  
I might agree with your “tax” on ammo if it were coupled with a tax on violent movies and video games and mandated that all monies go directly to state mental health programs. (which, btw… aint gonna happen since obama just gave tens of millions in tax breaks to the movie industry)

Now if you really want to curb the death toll in America, you should “outlaw” cars.  Do you know how many tens of thousands die each year from those vehicles of destruction???

Simplistic liberal thinking never ceases to amaze me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, re: 5:56<br />
Do you actually think about this stuff before you type?  Assuming you are correct on your MD tax numbers, did you consider that folks might be going to surrounding states to get their smokes? Or did you miss the entire premise of my post on VA attempting to regulate this type of activity?</p>
<p>You and your minions suggest measures that may not “eliminate every last bit of behavior that it seeks to discourage”  given your suggestions and looking at facts the real question is what are you trying to discourage?  if it is to “discourage” legal gun use you might be on the right track.  (Like JM  said he shoots 10k rounds and it would cost him an extra 200 bucks/yr; to some that might make the sport less affordable.)  </p>
<p>If it is to “discourage” mental cases from killing people you are far afield.  Do you really think the mental case cares if it costs him another 2 bucks for his hundred rounds to shoot people?  Maybe you believe he might think twice because he won’t be able to afford his starbucks coffee after his “spree”…<br />
If you really wanted to curb the problem of “mental cases” commiting crimes, I would suggest looking at how to reduce the “mental cases”.  Have these people become desensitized from the violence in video games/movies?  (it seems the newtown nut spent most of his time playing violent video).  I know this is not near as sexy or popular to the left as gun issues, but are you looking for an issue or a solution?<br />
I might agree with your “tax” on ammo if it were coupled with a tax on violent movies and video games and mandated that all monies go directly to state mental health programs. (which, btw… aint gonna happen since obama just gave tens of millions in tax breaks to the movie industry)</p>
<p>Now if you really want to curb the death toll in America, you should “outlaw” cars.  Do you know how many tens of thousands die each year from those vehicles of destruction???</p>
<p>Simplistic liberal thinking never ceases to amaze me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandi Saunders</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/a-patrick-henry-high-school-alum-address-congress/#comment-278106</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 02:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=36071#comment-278106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think some are refusing any idea or point on the most specious of reasoning and calling it &quot;logic&quot;.  There is no law that completely solves whatever problem it is aimed at.  If you think there is, name it?  That is just hooey.  

I think J.M. White is on the right track, the ideas need to be do the best we can do to remove guns and ammo from criminals instead of law abiding gun owners.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think some are refusing any idea or point on the most specious of reasoning and calling it &#8220;logic&#8221;.  There is no law that completely solves whatever problem it is aimed at.  If you think there is, name it?  That is just hooey.  </p>
<p>I think J.M. White is on the right track, the ideas need to be do the best we can do to remove guns and ammo from criminals instead of law abiding gun owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
