<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: She has some thoughts on Morgan Griffith&#8217;s &#8216;survey&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/she-has-some-thoughts-on-morgan-griffiths-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/she-has-some-thoughts-on-morgan-griffiths-survey/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:16:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/she-has-some-thoughts-on-morgan-griffiths-survey/#comment-267089</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35601#comment-267089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment by Leon — January 14, 2013 @ 7:28 pm
&quot;it also helps to think Hillary. Your link does not detail what the “intermediate set of economic and demographic assumptions” assume.?&quot;

Are you really this dim?  Unless those who provided the projected numbers are actually &lt;em&gt;clairvoyant&lt;/em&gt;, how would they know what the economy, tax collected revenues, or what obstructionist republicans&#039; impact on SS will be in 2013?  
They. Cannot. Read. The. Future.

According to the best economic estimates, SS &quot;would become exhausted between 2036 and 2041&quot; [without some corrective measures] - your  claim in your previous post, claimed there was no money left in SS - that was FALSE as my link demonstrated.

Can you predict the economic future,  or the impact of the unemployment on FICA ?  No?  Well that was the point of their words: &quot;intermediate set of economic and demographic assumptions” 

All the other smoke and mirrors,  jibber jabber that you went on and on about, are not worth the time answering... Your very juvenile name calling &quot;sheeple&quot; - well, it sounds incredibly stupid, however, it is far better than my having to think you&#039;re a dim bulb, no?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by Leon — January 14, 2013 @ 7:28 pm<br />
&#8220;it also helps to think Hillary. Your link does not detail what the “intermediate set of economic and demographic assumptions” assume.?&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you really this dim?  Unless those who provided the projected numbers are actually <em>clairvoyant</em>, how would they know what the economy, tax collected revenues, or what obstructionist republicans&#8217; impact on SS will be in 2013?<br />
They. Cannot. Read. The. Future.</p>
<p>According to the best economic estimates, SS &#8220;would become exhausted between 2036 and 2041&#8243; [without some corrective measures] &#8211; your  claim in your previous post, claimed there was no money left in SS &#8211; that was FALSE as my link demonstrated.</p>
<p>Can you predict the economic future,  or the impact of the unemployment on FICA ?  No?  Well that was the point of their words: &#8220;intermediate set of economic and demographic assumptions” </p>
<p>All the other smoke and mirrors,  jibber jabber that you went on and on about, are not worth the time answering&#8230; Your very juvenile name calling &#8220;sheeple&#8221; &#8211; well, it sounds incredibly stupid, however, it is far better than my having to think you&#8217;re a dim bulb, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/she-has-some-thoughts-on-morgan-griffiths-survey/#comment-267087</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35601#comment-267087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;…spread your truth elsewhere.&quot;

Warren, Leon rejects your reality and instead substitutes his own alternative reality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;…spread your truth elsewhere.&#8221;</p>
<p>Warren, Leon rejects your reality and instead substitutes his own alternative reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/she-has-some-thoughts-on-morgan-griffiths-survey/#comment-266866</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35601#comment-266866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Warren@18:  As to the housing bubble and industry your point is somewhat valid.  As to the rest of industries and goods...not so much.  Deflation accross the board would be devestating...as will the inflation that the
present monetary policy is escalating.  Economically, these be unusual times.  Reducing spending and the size of government will, in time happen,
but by then the balance of the economy will likely be in shambles.  My point on Bernanke&#039;s printing of $ is valid...spread your truth elsewhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warren@18:  As to the housing bubble and industry your point is somewhat valid.  As to the rest of industries and goods&#8230;not so much.  Deflation accross the board would be devestating&#8230;as will the inflation that the<br />
present monetary policy is escalating.  Economically, these be unusual times.  Reducing spending and the size of government will, in time happen,<br />
but by then the balance of the economy will likely be in shambles.  My point on Bernanke&#8217;s printing of $ is valid&#8230;spread your truth elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/she-has-some-thoughts-on-morgan-griffiths-survey/#comment-266788</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35601#comment-266788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every $ he prints reduces the value of the $s in your wallet
comment by Leon

This has been explained repeatedly Leon, if you don&#039;t get it this time you either can&#039;t or won&#039;t get it. What you said above is only true when demand matches or exceeds supply. But we&#039;ve been in a huge recession, with DEFLATIONARY effects. That means supply capacity was far greater than demand, after the bubble burst that had created artificial (therefore unsustainable) levels of demand. So printing money, rather than cheapening it as in inflation, has been bolstering it during deflation.

Whereas the goal in inflationary times is to tighten the money supply until consumption (demand) comes down to match capacity (supply), the goal in deflationary times is to create more liquidity until demand rises to match supply. Done judiciously, it will mean that we emerge with an economy at real levels of productivity and consumption that are more aligned to each other. In the case of the U.S. economy, it should get us to a point where we are restored to pre-recession levels, but with asset values that are economically sound instead of the unjustified asset valuations of before the crash. At that point the deflated dollar&#039;s value will be restored, not inflated.

That&#039;s the truth, and not to hard for average minds to understand. It may not suit the needs of dittoheads, but no one ever said dittoheads care about the truth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every $ he prints reduces the value of the $s in your wallet<br />
comment by Leon</p>
<p>This has been explained repeatedly Leon, if you don&#8217;t get it this time you either can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t get it. What you said above is only true when demand matches or exceeds supply. But we&#8217;ve been in a huge recession, with DEFLATIONARY effects. That means supply capacity was far greater than demand, after the bubble burst that had created artificial (therefore unsustainable) levels of demand. So printing money, rather than cheapening it as in inflation, has been bolstering it during deflation.</p>
<p>Whereas the goal in inflationary times is to tighten the money supply until consumption (demand) comes down to match capacity (supply), the goal in deflationary times is to create more liquidity until demand rises to match supply. Done judiciously, it will mean that we emerge with an economy at real levels of productivity and consumption that are more aligned to each other. In the case of the U.S. economy, it should get us to a point where we are restored to pre-recession levels, but with asset values that are economically sound instead of the unjustified asset valuations of before the crash. At that point the deflated dollar&#8217;s value will be restored, not inflated.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the truth, and not to hard for average minds to understand. It may not suit the needs of dittoheads, but no one ever said dittoheads care about the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayne goodman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/she-has-some-thoughts-on-morgan-griffiths-survey/#comment-266774</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne goodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 03:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35601#comment-266774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[15.Wayne @ 11: personally, I prefer Blackjack as it is the only game in the casino where one can even the odds or actually get favorable odds. If they would offer the $ I’ll be taking it. I can easily manage $ better than the goverment. . .I don’t get hung up on redistribution and understand positive cashflow makes the world go ’round.

Comment by Leon — January 14, 2013 @ 7:34 pm 

You are right about blackjack but I would not equate what wall street does to playing blackjack. Just take as look back to 2000 to 2008.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>15.Wayne @ 11: personally, I prefer Blackjack as it is the only game in the casino where one can even the odds or actually get favorable odds. If they would offer the $ I’ll be taking it. I can easily manage $ better than the goverment. . .I don’t get hung up on redistribution and understand positive cashflow makes the world go ’round.</p>
<p>Comment by Leon — January 14, 2013 @ 7:34 pm </p>
<p>You are right about blackjack but I would not equate what wall street does to playing blackjack. Just take as look back to 2000 to 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gdad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/she-has-some-thoughts-on-morgan-griffiths-survey/#comment-266743</link>
		<dc:creator>gdad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35601#comment-266743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look, Leon&#039;s &quot;guessing.&quot; I&#039;m impressed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, Leon&#8217;s &#8220;guessing.&#8221; I&#8217;m impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/she-has-some-thoughts-on-morgan-griffiths-survey/#comment-266724</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35601#comment-266724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wayne @ 11:  personally, I prefer Blackjack as it is the only game in the casino where one can even the odds or actually get favorable odds.  If they would offer the $ I&#039;ll be taking it. I can easily manage $ better than the goverment. . .I don&#039;t get hung up on redistribution and understand positive cashflow makes the world go &#039;round.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne @ 11:  personally, I prefer Blackjack as it is the only game in the casino where one can even the odds or actually get favorable odds.  If they would offer the $ I&#8217;ll be taking it. I can easily manage $ better than the goverment. . .I don&#8217;t get hung up on redistribution and understand positive cashflow makes the world go &#8217;round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/she-has-some-thoughts-on-morgan-griffiths-survey/#comment-266722</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35601#comment-266722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The last 5 Trustees Reports have indicated that Social Security’s Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) Trust Funds would become exhausted between 2036 and 2041 under the intermediate set of economic and demographic assumptions provided in each report”
 http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/solvency/index.html

Comment by Hillary — January 14, 2013 @ 6:02 pm 

It also helps to think Hillary.  Your link does not detail what the &quot;intermediate set of economic and demographic assumptions&quot; assume. 
I would venture a guess, however, that they include a funds earning rate of 5 to 7 percent and do not include the last two years of reduced inflow of the 2 percent SS tax reduction the expiration of which is causing much lament.  SS inflows were short of outflows by about $45 billion last year.
But...it gets worse...BBB (Barack&#039;s Buddy Bernanke) is printing $80 billion a month in currency (called QE III) to &quot;bolster&quot; the economy.  Every $ he prints reduces the value of the $s in your wallet, paycheck or
SS check.  When inflation really starts to manifest itself (likely this summer due to the effect of drought on the food supplies) everyone on SS will be demanding mo, mo, mo and the politicians will print more $ and give it to them increasing the outflows which already exceed the inflows.

Hopefully, you will have obtained a hardcopy of the actuary report to supplement what you will receive from SS.  True comfort may be found in it
as toilet paper may become unaffordable and you will either have a ready supply or an item you can barter for food.

BTW...what are the earnings rate on your invested funds...probably close to 10% of what the government report assumes for your SS funds in trust. 

News reports today indicate that the Obama administration will not have a budget proposal ready by the March deadline. . .further reinforcing the need to raise the debt ceiling which would be the responsible action per Mr. Obama.  Sheeple Hillary. . .keep believing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The last 5 Trustees Reports have indicated that Social Security’s Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) Trust Funds would become exhausted between 2036 and 2041 under the intermediate set of economic and demographic assumptions provided in each report”<br />
 <a href="http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/solvency/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/solvency/index.html</a></p>
<p>Comment by Hillary — January 14, 2013 @ 6:02 pm </p>
<p>It also helps to think Hillary.  Your link does not detail what the &#8220;intermediate set of economic and demographic assumptions&#8221; assume.<br />
I would venture a guess, however, that they include a funds earning rate of 5 to 7 percent and do not include the last two years of reduced inflow of the 2 percent SS tax reduction the expiration of which is causing much lament.  SS inflows were short of outflows by about $45 billion last year.<br />
But&#8230;it gets worse&#8230;BBB (Barack&#8217;s Buddy Bernanke) is printing $80 billion a month in currency (called QE III) to &#8220;bolster&#8221; the economy.  Every $ he prints reduces the value of the $s in your wallet, paycheck or<br />
SS check.  When inflation really starts to manifest itself (likely this summer due to the effect of drought on the food supplies) everyone on SS will be demanding mo, mo, mo and the politicians will print more $ and give it to them increasing the outflows which already exceed the inflows.</p>
<p>Hopefully, you will have obtained a hardcopy of the actuary report to supplement what you will receive from SS.  True comfort may be found in it<br />
as toilet paper may become unaffordable and you will either have a ready supply or an item you can barter for food.</p>
<p>BTW&#8230;what are the earnings rate on your invested funds&#8230;probably close to 10% of what the government report assumes for your SS funds in trust. </p>
<p>News reports today indicate that the Obama administration will not have a budget proposal ready by the March deadline. . .further reinforcing the need to raise the debt ceiling which would be the responsible action per Mr. Obama.  Sheeple Hillary. . .keep believing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/she-has-some-thoughts-on-morgan-griffiths-survey/#comment-266695</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35601#comment-266695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment by Leon — January 14, 2013 @ 5:00 pm
&quot;Very astute Wayne. . .however. . .one additional pertinent point. . .there
is no money left in the program. . .it has all been spent. Otherwise, you
got it. Congrats.&quot;

Leon it is usually helpful to have information before making wild claims like, &quot;no money left in the program&quot; - this is the FACT about the solvency of Social Security.

&quot;The last 5 Trustees Reports have indicated that Social Security&#039;s Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) Trust Funds would become exhausted between 2036 and 2041 under the intermediate set of economic and demographic assumptions provided in each report&quot;
http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/solvency/index.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by Leon — January 14, 2013 @ 5:00 pm<br />
&#8220;Very astute Wayne. . .however. . .one additional pertinent point. . .there<br />
is no money left in the program. . .it has all been spent. Otherwise, you<br />
got it. Congrats.&#8221;</p>
<p>Leon it is usually helpful to have information before making wild claims like, &#8220;no money left in the program&#8221; &#8211; this is the FACT about the solvency of Social Security.</p>
<p>&#8220;The last 5 Trustees Reports have indicated that Social Security&#8217;s Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) Trust Funds would become exhausted between 2036 and 2041 under the intermediate set of economic and demographic assumptions provided in each report&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/solvency/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/solvency/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/2013/01/she-has-some-thoughts-on-morgan-griffiths-survey/#comment-266667</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/dancasey/?p=35601#comment-266667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right Leon. The most successful program in history for guaranteeing that people who get old and are unable to work will be able to survive with some measure of dignity and independence is “a Ponzi scheme” And it is Leon’s, the Republicans and Morgan Griffith’s idea that we should do away with it and turn that money over to Wall Street to “invest” it for us. We’d be just as well off taking it to Vegas and playing roulette with it. Not to mention that the program also provides for aqid to dependent children and disability benefits.

Comment by wayne goodman — January 14, 2013 @ 4:06 pm 

Very astute Wayne. . .however. . .one additional pertinent point. . .there
is no money left in the program. . .it has all been spent.  Otherwise, you
got it.  Congrats.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right Leon. The most successful program in history for guaranteeing that people who get old and are unable to work will be able to survive with some measure of dignity and independence is “a Ponzi scheme” And it is Leon’s, the Republicans and Morgan Griffith’s idea that we should do away with it and turn that money over to Wall Street to “invest” it for us. We’d be just as well off taking it to Vegas and playing roulette with it. Not to mention that the program also provides for aqid to dependent children and disability benefits.</p>
<p>Comment by wayne goodman — January 14, 2013 @ 4:06 pm </p>
<p>Very astute Wayne. . .however. . .one additional pertinent point. . .there<br />
is no money left in the program. . .it has all been spent.  Otherwise, you<br />
got it.  Congrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
