Comments on: A few words about “low-information voters”

By: gdad

gdad — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:38:50 +0000

“Low information voter” is too wordy and cumbersome.”

Exactly my complaint, Kristen (along with the fact that it’s been used so much it’s already cliche). A good insulting phrase needs to flow. “Low” is absolutely the wrong word here and “information” is just too long. Whoever made it up — Limbaugh or or somebody else — either has a tin ear or just couldn’t come up with anything else and was desperate.

By: Kristen

Kristen — Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:02:08 +0000

Not witty. “Low information voter” is too wordy and cumbersome.

By: gdad

gdad — Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:43:08 +0000

#164 I enjoy a good laugh at either side, but those are just dumb.

By: Sabot

Sabot — Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:51:06 +0000

It was only a matter of time: http://www.zazzle.com/lowinformationvoter

By: Sandi Saunders

Sandi Saunders — Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:13:53 +0000

Awood, being a wiseacre while still being wrong, does not help your case. I can see that anonymity helps conceal more than just your lack of intelligence. The Senate (and the House to a lesser degree) have all sorts of procedures whereby the party not in the majority, may “game”, disrupt and wreak havoc with the system. Democrats are not “in control” of the Senate. Can you possibly not know this?

–

And yes, Awood is the old Applewood. Can you people pick a name and stick to it?

By: gdad

gdad — Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:46:18 +0000

#161 Awood, showing up for a few seconds to claim Congress is still in session when it fact it really isn’t is gaming the system. Period.

Did I type that slowly enough for you to absorb it? Probably not.

By: Awood

Awood — Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:35:24 +0000

O.K. Saunders…real s-l-o-w for you…how could the repubs…still with me?….`game` anything when they ……..still here?……had NO CONTROL of anything ? If the repubs could `game,` obama would have impeachment charges as we speak . The 3-0 signified President, House, and Senate. Now, I can`t do my thing, if I`ve got to walk you through everything. Slow-walk, I mean. Sheeeez.

By: Sandi Saunders

Sandi Saunders — Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:02:13 +0000

Awood, is your insulting post based on the premise that no one can game the system or that Republicans cannot?

Is Awood, the old applewood?

By: Sandi Saunders

Sandi Saunders — Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:56:43 +0000

“…the independent Congressional Research Service found 329 intrasession recess appointments made since 1981 – 72 by Ronald Reagan, 37 by George H.W. Bush, 53 by Bill Clinton, 141 by George W. Bush and 26 by Barack Obama. It also tracked 323 intersession recess appointments by those presidents, but noted the lack of specific vacancy dates for many of those make it unclear how many would’ve been precluded by the recent court ruling.”
http://democrats.edworkforce.house.gov/sites/democrats.edworkforce.house.gov/files/documents/112/pdf/Recess%20Appointments%201981-2013.pdf

–

The point remains, this is a political machination, not a justifiable case of wrongdoing being eradicated.

By: gdad

gdad — Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:41:18 +0000

Oh, please, Awood.