The Rapier of Richmond takes on insaniTEA
This sublime bit of genius is from cartoonist Chris OBrion who tells me it was inspired by my Thursday column. More from Chris here.
See if our Paparazzi cameras caught you or your friends at any recent events around town.
This sublime bit of genius is from cartoonist Chris OBrion who tells me it was inspired by my Thursday column. More from Chris here.
View our commenting policy and standards | Commenting FAQ | Report a problem
39 COMMENTS
Name is required
A valid email is required (test@test.com)
Comment is required
Your email address will not be published.
All fields are required to comment.
I’ll bet WTEA will not be advertising for the North American Man Boy Love Association like Dan has done on his blog.
More of that civility you promised?
Funny but sad. Now that they’ve had a genuine negative impact on everyone else, it will serve as some motivation to shut them down, or at least send them back under their rocks.
this is the so called ‘tolerance’ of the dems…what a bunch of hypocrites. at least none of our politicians were raised/mentored by communists
debbie I sold my business and made a killing, what’s it to you
Below is a link to an opinion piece by E. J. Dionne in yesterday’s Washington Post. It asks some really pertinent questions about the inconsistencies in the right wing of the Republican Party arguments about how to move forward or not.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ej-dionne-jr-conservatives-contradict-themselves-on-american-power/2013/03/17/8467a956-8da2-11e2-b63f-f53fb9f2fcb4_story.html?hpid=z2
Wrong thread, pammala. Good for you. If you don’t know what my comment in the other thread was referring to, that’s your problem. It just further validates what you wrote, in your case.
pammala | March 18, 2013 at 8:28 am
debbie I sold my business and made a killing, what’s it to you
——–
How much of a ‘killing’ can one make by selling off their Avon stock?
Avon stock in my other post should really be Avon inventory.
Big Bad Dad | March 18, 2013 at 6:28 am
I’ll bet WTEA will not be advertising for the North American Man Boy Love Association like Dan has done on his blog.
——–
I wasn’t aware Dan was advocating for the Catholic Church.
pammala, the notion of someone who can’t spell or punctuate “making a killing” is pretty amusing.
You write like a 6th grader and yet you expect us to believe you owned a successful retail operation? Please, you’re killing me! You can’t even spell your name right.
It’s the internets, pammala, where all conservatives who can’t spell are young, skinny, beautiful, well-educated and phenomenally rich. Yeah, sure, that’s the ticket!
you libbiecoms are so insulted when someone doesn’t use proper grammar. you can read it, it’s just that you are so low tolerant of people that your anger comes out on silly, immature subjects, jealous are you, lol.. I sold my business which was a franchise and made lots of green, babe, can you understand that or does the lack of capital letters confuse you that much? such simple minds.
I own stock dear but not Avon
I cant spell my name right, what is the intention of that post=
” You can’t even spell your name right.”
yes there only one way in the world to spell someone’s name,,,haha,,keep going dear you’re cracking me up
No more free Big Gulps for pammala!
oh now debbie, I see you have NEVER made a mistake in your entire little sad life….no wonder you are so inexperienced in life and believe the libbiecoms…
I doesn’t drink soft drinks dear, but your photo sure shows that you do and lots of them
excuse me grammar police, should
I don’t drink soft sugary drinks”
‘..you are so low tolerant …’
LOL
Dan That was just plain funny and I almost spilled my coffee.
I admit it, I am “so low tolerant of people”.
And the waterboarding of the language continues.
pammala, in the comment on the other thread, I said that the statement that you posted there, was not helping your cause any. The same holds true on this thread.
“oh now debbie, I see you have NEVER made a mistake in your entire little sad life…”
Uhh, pammala, you make several mistakes EVERY TIME you post.
pammala | March 18, 2013 at 2:32 pm
I own stock dear but not Avon
——–
I hardly think those two chickens and the goat in your backyard count as ‘stock’.
Pamela, I doubt you would have made it to school without crossing guards, much less negotiate the sale of an asset without adult supervision.
This “dumb” schtick is getting old. Nobody can possibly be this stupid…or can they?
Art Hill: This “dumb” schtick is getting old. Nobody can possibly be this stupid…or can they?
I think the post form autocorrect did wonders on pammala’s spelling.
Just wait till a certain someone returns from a self-imposed religious “hiatus.” The phrase “circle jerk” comes to mind.
Hey pammela,
I think you’ve got the record! 8 of ‘em (different libs) since 2:35 p.m. today have attacked you! VERY well done!
Frank, there was nothing in my post anybody could consider an “attack.” I simply pointed out a provable fact. Nothing more.
When Dan stops with the bald partisanship, that’s when you know he’s re-evaluating his faith.
We’re praying for that.
So Frank, you are against “attacks” and call them out when they are on one of you right wingers and all for them and even applaud them when they are against one of us. Small.
“Bald partisanship”? A bit personal, don’t you think?
When Dan becomes a bigger conduit for conservatism, it will mean he has lost his faith, not found it. That you think Jesus is on your side is baffling. What Bible do you people read? I heard somewhere that young Catholics do not study the Bible, it seems to be true.
I spill guud. All you loosers pull mah fanger!!!!!!!!!
When Dan becomes a bigger conduit for conservatism, it will mean he has lost his faith, not found it. That you think Jesus is on your side is baffling. What Bible do you people read? I heard somewhere that young Catholics do not study the Bible, it seems to be true.
That’s a strange comment coming from someone who believes in few or none of the biblical teachings. She won’t even joins the church she claims to attends because they believe in the bible and she doesn’t.
“Bald partisanship”? A bit personal, don’t you think?
lol. My bad.
Again you dare to accuse someone of not believing in Biblical teachings? You have no standing to do so, none. Whether I claim to be devout or atheist, you have no standing to complain about it. What “biblical teachings” do you believe you exhibit?
You twist what people say, lie about what people believe, denigrate what you disagree with and dare to claim you have been “civil”. I swear you are more like a sociopath every day.
Re: Sandi Saunders | March 20, 2013 at 1:40 pm
Again, well done, Sandi