From the archives: In search of the perfect candidate
For any Republicans out there fretting about their party’s field of presidential candidates, here’s a blast from the past.
This editorial cartoon ran in The Roanoke World-News on April 29, 1952, depicting Ohio Senator Robert Taft appearing before a group of GOP activists — and coming up short in their appraisal of his candidate skills.
Or at least his looks.
I can’t help but notice that the activists shown are all women — and their concern is mostly about Taft’s appearance, not his views on the issues of the day.
Of course, Taft came up short that year — losing out to Dwight Eisenhower, who went on to win the presidency. Taft represented the conservative wing of the party at the time; Eisenhower was considered more of a moderate.
In today’s climate, might Taft have fared better, even if he did apparently lack something in charisma?
And a final note: Am I the only one who thinks that poster image of Taft in the background looks a lot like Jimmy Carter?
– Dwayne Yancey




As fickle as people are now, he probably would have fared no better. Since I’m no political guru, it’s just my “gut” feeling. And Dwayne, I think it’s you only (at least from my perspective). I don’t see Jimmy at all.
I doubt anyone could have beaten Eisenhower. I do not see Carter, but I think it is the toothy grin and cheeks that make you see him. Since the right wingers go on and on about Palin, Bachmann and Romney’s “good looks” (as if), no I do not think Taft would have a chance today.