Don't Miss

Enter your photo in the Ultimate Fan contest by midnight to win a suite night at a Salem Red Sox game and a chance at a trip to Fenway Park.

Does Roanoke still need to build an amphitheatre?

The pavilion at the Daleville Town Center, which next week will host the band Trampled by Turtles. Has private enterprise done in Botetourt what city government is trying to do in Roanoke?

A more or less accurate conversation between Mason Adams, city hall and politics reporter, and Dwayne Yancey, senior editor (and Botetourt County resident):

Dwayne: Hey, Mason, what’s the status of the amphitheater the city was talking about building?

Mason: Dwayne, that’s part of the council’s plan to rework Elmwood Park. If you remember the council had initially considered a $14 million “commercial” amphitheater, but when the recession hit it scaled back those plans considerably. Now they’re looking at a stripped down version, as well as additional changes to the park – taking out the lily-pad ponds, reworking the wooded area along Elm Ave. into a series of “outdoor rooms,” that sort of thing. The price tag for the whole shebang is $4.7 million.

In April, Hill Studio presented some designs for the amphitheater, which will be pushed back to the corner of Williamson Road and where Bullitt Avenue would intersect if you extended it out. My understanding is that Hill Studio is reworking those designs quite a bit and probably will present the new version to the council next month. They’re taking bids now for the first phase of the park renovation – basically Bullitt Avenue north to Franklin Road – and the second phase, which includes the amphitheater, will be put out to bid this fall.

Any reason for the interest?

Dwayne: Well, I see where the Kirk Avenue Music Hall is bringing the band Trampled to Turtles to town. But here’s the thing – they’re not playing on Kirk. They’re playing out at the Daleville Town Center – you know, that development on U.S. 220 where Layman Brothers Orchard used to be. There’s a pretty nice bandstand that’s been built there — The Botetourt Wine Trail has had some concerts there, but this is the first time some outside promoter has brought something in.

So here’s the thing: Does Roanoke still need to build an amphitheater if promoters are bringing shows to the Daleville Town Center? Why do the taxpayers of Roanoke need to foot the bill for amphitheater when it looks like private enterprise has just filled the market need on its own?

Mason: At one point there was talk of a 7,000-seat amphitheater to be built in Bedford County near Smith Mountain Lake. That was at the same time the city was still considering the larger version of the amphitheater. I think the recession ground those plans to a halt, though.

It would seem that if there’s a privately run amphitheater within striking range that concert promoters might just go there instead of Roanoke. But the city’s still got a lock on many of the region’s major festivals: Local Colors, Festival in the Park probably foremost among them. I guess we could see those festivals eventually migrate out to Daleville. But I can’t imagine that Roanoke would let them go without a fight to keep them downtown. Can you imagine the egg on Mayor David Bowers’ face if Roanoke loses Festival in the Park on his watch? There’s not just the loss of prestige, but the loss of all the dollars spent by festival attendees in the park and at nearby restaurants and motels. Keeping those dollars downtown would alone be enough of a justification for many of these city officials and council members to invest capital funds.

Dwayne: Well, I hadn’t really thought in terms of festivals. But you don’t need an amphitheater for those, do you? You need an amphitheater for concerts. And Trampled by Turtles seems to me the kind of up-and-coming national act that would wind up playing at an amphitheater – and right now, they’re going to be rocking out in Daleville. It’s not exactly the Nissan Pavilion out there – basically a grassy field, with a nice bandstand and a great view of the mountains. Since it’s a field, I don’t know what the formal seating capacity is. Still . . . I don’t mean to go all Tea Party here, but, gosh, why should the city pay millions for a fancy amphitheater when it looks like we already have a privately-built venue that’s serving that need? Or is the city going to be so insistent on having its own facility that we’ll wind up with two of them, just like we have two different civic centers?

Mason: This year’s Festival in the Park was headlined by the Gin Blossoms, which were kind of the Trampled by Turtles of 1996 or so. Other festivals have included concerts as well.

But I get your greater point. And since I moved back to Roanoke in 2003, my wish list for the region has been topped by a year-round concert venue which could draw small national or large regional acts – something like the Orange Peel in Asheville. That makes more sense for the private sector than for the public sector. We’ve even had versions of that ideal throughout my tenure here, from Factory 324, which hosted punk and metal acts before it closed, to the Jefferson Center and the aforementioned Kirk Avenue Music Hall. Heck, there’s even a new venue just down the road in the auto district on Rorer Ave. called the Coffin House, which just pulled in Dying Fetus. Sure, Dying Fetus is probably not on most people’s radar – but in the world of death metal they’re an internationally known act that’s now in the midst of a pretty big tour across the U.S. and Europe.

But back to the amphitheater in Elmwood Park: The city considers that to be Roanoke’s backyard. And I expect that local promoters and city officials would each make the case that business generated by people coming downtown for concerts and festivals would help make the investment worth it. Certainly everyone doesn’t necessarily agree with that – but it’s telling this project has moved forward a lot more quietly than previous proposals such as an amphitheater down by the river, the original, bigger version proposed for Elmwood or even renovations to Victory Stadium.

Dwayne: So what you’re saying is . . . the city doesn’t care whether private enterprise has already created such a venue out in Botetourt, the taxpayers of the city are going to have to pay for a fancier facility in downtown in the name of economic development? All I know is as a resident of Botetourt, I haven’t paid a dime and suddenly there’s a bandstand with an actual big-name band playing there! How great is that? More seriously, does the presence of this venue change any of the economic calculations behind the city’s project?

Mason: Well, I’m not speaking on the city’s behalf or arguing for the Elmwood Park project so much as I’m trying to explain what I see as its viewpoint. But yes, I’d say that city officials don’t care whether there’s a new venue in Daleville that’s attracting prominent bands: With bids already out on phase I, I’d say the Elmwood Park renovation train has left the station … unless that is the city council sees something it doesn’t like during the next briefing (I think in early July) and halts everything. Otherwise they’re moving forward.

It might, however, change the calculus when it comes to marketing and booking. Don’t forget that in addition to the private venue in Daleville there’s also the public music venue to consider in Rocky Mount. That’s competition to both the north and the south. How that all factors into marketing and booking is a question beyond my pay grade, but maybe something worth exploring as this process moves forward.

Join the conversation [ADD A COMMENT]

8 COMMENTS

  1. Trevor L | June 21, 2012 at 8:43 pm

    I love the thought of Elmwood Park as Roanoke’s backyard. It’s a great space that acts as a cultural epicenter for the valley. The natural amphitheater created by the hillside has always been the best venue in Roanoke to see musicians perform. Unfortunately, it’s not the venue the best acts choose to perform. This is why I think the City needs to be bold with its plans for the park.

    My plan would move the library to the old Heironimus building. It’s many floors is the perfect space for the stacks of books. Knocking the library down gives more space to work with. This rectifies one of the problems with the original amphitheater plan: a cramped area. More space means that a that Elmwood Park wouldn’t lose it’s park-feel. It creates balance of public usage and private events that keeps the park vibrant.

    A well used park will certainly bring traffic downtown. Economic development would follow. But also keep in mind the growing population downtown. Is there a better selling point than a quality amphitheater surrounded by green-space frequented by touring musicians?

  2. tass | June 21, 2012 at 8:49 pm

    LOL you just scored big points in my house for including the Rorer Avenue venue/recent act. One of my kids loves that awful, awful “music” as much as I love the acts that come to Kirk Avenue. Personally I think Elmwood Park is fine as it is with its existing stage and the city should be spending its money on its horrible schools instead.

  3. Dylan | June 22, 2012 at 8:32 am

    Does Roanoke still need to build an amphitheatre?
    My opinion is no, and that they should instead better utilize existing venues.
    And there are more pressing issues in the city that the money could be used for at the moment.

  4. old blue | June 22, 2012 at 8:49 am

    Roanoke is at its best when it is what it is. Namely, a nice family friendly town with still viable neighborhoods. The city should absolutely NOT build an amphitheater. It would bleed red ink.

  5. Sandi Saunders | June 22, 2012 at 10:58 am

    I was impressed with the Hill Studio rendering I saw and felt it only enhanced the park and as a venue. No city can thrive without the outdoor festivals and activities that make us a community and I hope Roanoke can find a way to do it. $4.7 million is a fair investment IMO.

  6. Sandi Saunders | June 22, 2012 at 11:01 am

    Roanoke is not Philadelphia. As the picture above reminds us, there are terra firma vistas to take your breath within a 20 minute ride in several directions. All the hiking and biking a soul can do in even less time. We are not in dire need of a plain park in downtown. Go for the new design so we can start enjoying it!

  7. Howard | June 25, 2012 at 4:24 pm

    That is a very pretty covered stage. We already have a (not so pretty) covered stage at Elmwood Park. I’m sorry, but these are not the type of venues major or even midsized performers usually play. You can occasionally get perfomers to play these stages, but not on any regular basis. Roanoke can support a medium sized amphitheatre that can book national acts.

  8. gdad | June 26, 2012 at 8:45 am

    Unless it’s just not in the photo, I see no shade for listeners. Thursday’s forecast is for a high of 91 and low of 72. No thanks.

Error submitting comment

Name is required

A valid email is required (test@test.com)

Comment is required

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published.
All fields are required to comment.

processing

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Weather Journal

Severe storm risk continues today

Wed, 22 May 2013 13:19:25 +0000

About this blog

The Blue Ridge Caucus is written by Roanoke Times newsroom staffers including Dave Ress, Chase Purdy and Dwayne Yancey. The blog covers all things politics, especially west of Virginia’s capitol, with historical perspective on issue and positions, and money and campaign finance.

RSS feed








Recent Comments

  • Cold n P: McAuliff will not get out the vote in Virginia and we will indeed have the likes of Cuccinelli in Richmond...
  • Art Hill: “Who really cares! “ As a taxpayer, I do. Crickets from our hosts?
  • Scamuel Jones: These two Republidiots (McDonnell and Cuccinelli) have opened themselves to be proven in the media to...
  • David Ress: Actually, he is a Democrat
  • Bubba Greene: Who really cares! Who pays for airforce 1? Who paid for the girls vacations? Who cleans up when the...

Categories

Archives