Don't Miss

Are you the Ultimate Red Sox Fan? Enter your photo in our contest and you could win fan-tastic prizes.

Goodlatte issues statement on Supreme Court’s ruling in Arizona immigration case

Bob Goodlatte. Photo by Sam Dean, The Roanoke Times.

Earlier today, the Supreme Court threw out some, but not all, of the controversial Arizona law on immigration.

In response, Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Roanoke County, issued this statement:

“The problem of illegal immigration has reached crisis proportions, not just in Arizona, but throughout our entire country. Illegal immigration costs our taxpayers billions of dollars every year and places a significant burden on our schools, health care facilities, and law enforcement to name just a few. While the federal government has done little to combat this growing problem, today’s Supreme Court decision on Arizona v. United States does uphold a key provision of Arizona’s immigration law allowing law enforcement officials to obtain information about legal status when an individual is stopped for an unrelated offense. While this is good news, the remainder of the Supreme Court’s decision ties the hands of states in many ways and requires further Congressional action. For example, the decision strikes down the authority of states to detain an individual solely for an immigration offense, and also strikes down the authority of states to impose criminal penalties for certain activities by illegal aliens.

“While allowing states to require police to ask about immigration status when an individual is stopped for unrelated offenses is a step in the right direction, the problem is that states must then turn the information over to federal authorities and hope they do something about it. However, the reason why many states have felt compelled to enact their own immigration laws in the first place is the gross lack of enforcement at the federal level. This decision highlights the need for a new federal law that expressly grants the authority to states to help enforce our nation’s immigration laws. That is why I am a strong supporter of the CLEAR Act, which amends federal immigration law to specifically grant state and local law enforcement the authority to help enforce our immigration laws. I will continue to work to enact this important legislation and push for common sense immigration reforms.”

Start the conversation

Error submitting comment

Name is required

A valid email is required (test@test.com)

Comment is required

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published.
All fields are required to comment.

processing

Monday, May 20, 2013

Weather Journal

Soupiness eases a bit

Mon, 20 May 2013 05:22:51 +0000

About this blog

The Blue Ridge Caucus is written by Roanoke Times newsroom staffers including Dave Ress, Chase Purdy and Dwayne Yancey. The blog covers all things politics, especially west of Virginia’s capitol, with historical perspective on issue and positions, and money and campaign finance.

RSS feed






Recent Comments

  • Kristen: Gosh, I was wondering whether or not the GOP was in favor of ACA. I guess now after 10-12 pointless...
  • TB: “Radical” candidates are precisely what’s needed at the state level in light of the...
  • Drew: I figured Snyder had the LG spot locked.
  • JWS: The radical Republicans have cemented their control of the party in Virginia. I attended the 1978 Republican...
  • wayne goodman: Taken together, the three most radical candidates for the state’s top offices in my lifetime (70...

Categories

Archives