What we learned from election 2012
There are probably lots of things both sides learned from this week’s election. Here are three of them that apply at least indirectly to our corner of the state.
* Virginia will be a swing state again in 2016. Virginia’s status as a swing state snuck up on us in 2008, as Obama dramatically expanded the map that year. This year’s even narrower margin in Virginia would guarantee the Old Dominion would be on both party’s maps next time around. North Carolina, too. The Obama campaign seemed to pull back from the Tar Heel State a few weeks out, to concentrate on Ohio. Indeed, Romney carried North Carolina, but not by as much as many observers thought he might. For what it’s worth, that would seem to confirm the Obama campaign’s wisdom in holding its convention in Charlotte, as a play for the vote in the newly purple states of North Carolina and, to a lesser extent, Virginia. Obama didn’t need North Carolina, but any time he forced Romney to spend there was time and resources the Republicans weren’t spending elsewhere.
* Southwest Virginia doesn’t matter for the Democrats anymore, but it sure does for the Republicans. We addressed some of this in a previous post: The Democrats once could count on strong margins out of the coalfields. Now, we’ve seen a dramatic re-alignment, and now the coalfields are delivering strong margins for the Republicans. Maybe this was simply a reflection of Obama’s alleged “war on coal” and his lack of connection with blue-collar voters, which showed up in non-coal areas. But given the way the parties are evolving, how likely are we to see the Democrats make a strong bid for votes in the coalfields again? (Check out this nifty chart showing how the demographics have changed, with Democratic support dropping among whites and union households, and increasing among young adults, college-educated voters and Hispanics). So as I noted in that previous post: Will Democrats ever again set foot west of Radford? By contrast, it’s now the Republicans who will want to maximize the vote there — to help offset Democratic votes elsewhere in the state. Granted, they need to get more of those votes, especially in Northern Virginia, but it’s a safe bet that Republicans will continue to mine the coalfields. I’d wager now that we’d see the 2016 Republican nominee for president make a visit to the Bristol-Abingdon area, close enough to be able to talk about coal issues (as Romney did.) Former Fla. Gov. Jeb Bush was scheduled to speak at Bluefield College before the election as part of an academic lecture series. Weather delayed his visit; perhaps when it’s re-scheduled, it’ll be one of the first Republican steps toward 2016, eh?
* Democrats won’t argue any more over a Southern Strategy vs. a Southwest Strategy. Party wonks have tussled over the past few cycles whether the party should invest in trying to compete in the South, or write off the South and focus on parts of the Southwest with growing Hispanic populations. We see now parts of both are possible. Democrats aren’t going to be competitive anytime soon in the Deep South, but Virginia and North Carolina have twice now proven to be winnable — along with Florida (if that counts as a Southern state.) Likewise, Democrats have now twice in a row won in Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico.
You’d think now Democrats might target Arizona, although Romney won pretty clearly there (55% to 44%). At one point, Democrats thought Georgia might be within their grasp, due to growth around Atlanta. Romney won there 53% to 45%, so it’s not unreasonable to imagine a Democratic path there in the future. (By contrast, Romney took 61% in Alabama.)
Conversely, Republicans might start arguing over whether it’s better to focus on reclaiming some of those western states (which might mean figuring out how to attract Hispanic voters) or, taking note of the Democrats’ declining share of the blue-collar vote, take aim at flipping Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan. Ohio was certainly a battleground this time and Romney made a late run at Pennsylvania. In time, we could see the two parties swap territory — the Democrats have already picked up some Sun Belt states, and the Republicans may be poised to make gains in Rust Belt states. Who knows? The Republicans once had a Southern Strategy; perhaps in the future, they’ll have a Northern Strategy.
– Dwayne Yancey



We learned that the moral values of the majority have lowered to new depths. We learned that the success of a party…any party…will be tied to having candidates that are 1. Black, 2. Latio, or 3. Women. We learned that in spite of ObamaCare, Blacks and Latino’s are still calling for improvements in their healthcare…WHAT! We learnd that never more will conservativism be the appropriate party line. We have learned that the creation of more poverty strengthen the success of the libs. We have confirmation of a more selfish society than at any time in history. We learned that personal responsibility has all but disappeared and has been replaced by gimme gimme gimme. We WILL learn that the only salvation to preserve our system will be a financial and social crisis unlike any ever seen in the last 500 years. We learned that class warefare DOES work as a political approach to running for office. And a few more but I gotta go and will save the best for later.
Guess what, Al, blacks, “latios”, and women get to vote too. The GOP had better wake up to that reality if they want the party to be extant in 10 years.
Of course Bubba you are aware that the Affordable Helath Care Act has not been fully implemented. In fact the Act will not be fully implemented until 2019:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act
You make the rather bold assertion based apparently on your own opinion that the “values of the majority have lowered to new depths”. What you offer in support of that is again, your own opinion, no facts.
I have no clue what you mean by “never more will conservatism be the appropriate party line”. Appropriate to whom, to what?
Your dismissive attitude towards Blacks, Latinos and Women seems to be the attitude that lost your candidate the election. The largest single voting block in the United States Bubba is women. There are more women than men in the U.S, and they vote at higher rates than men. Women accounted for 53% of all voters. Why you feel it is unimportant or not noteworthy to win this vote I have no idea but the Republicans did.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/2012-exit-polls/table.html
10% of all voters this year were Latino compared to 8% in ’08. I’m not sure how or why Republicans either did not want to appeal to this increasing block but by their own admission they did:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/09/republicans-losing-ground-among-hispanic-voters/
You finish with a bunch of tea party line talking points, again without any substantiation, that tell me you are again working under the delusion that big money and big fat white men determine election outcomes. If you and your party keep thinking that my friend future elections will not be any better for you. The Republican party needs to look at this country and adjust. I’m not talking just adjust campaigning tactics (though that surely would help), but I mean changes to policies that are inclusive and not exclusive.
Bubba never did get back to us here, did he?
Bubba wasn’t looking for a conversation.