<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Committees advance bills requiring drug screens of welfare recipients</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/01/29/committees-advance-bills-requiring-drug-screens-of-welfare-recipients/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/01/29/committees-advance-bills-requiring-drug-screens-of-welfare-recipients/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:38:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/01/29/committees-advance-bills-requiring-drug-screens-of-welfare-recipients/#comment-27618</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/?p=16645#comment-27618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree Mr. Art Hill, drug test legislators just like the military!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Mr. Art Hill, drug test legislators just like the military!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/01/29/committees-advance-bills-requiring-drug-screens-of-welfare-recipients/#comment-27617</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/?p=16645#comment-27617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disaster.....there goes my lawn furniture. Property crimes will increase....people&#039;s gonna eat!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disaster&#8230;..there goes my lawn furniture. Property crimes will increase&#8230;.people&#8217;s gonna eat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gdad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/01/29/committees-advance-bills-requiring-drug-screens-of-welfare-recipients/#comment-27595</link>
		<dc:creator>gdad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/?p=16645#comment-27595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Umm, applewood, #2 and #3 aren&#039;t agreeing with #1. Sheesh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, applewood, #2 and #3 aren&#8217;t agreeing with #1. Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandi Saunders</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/01/29/committees-advance-bills-requiring-drug-screens-of-welfare-recipients/#comment-27538</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/?p=16645#comment-27538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;&lt;em&gt;America&#039;s Four Socioeconomic Classes 

1. Parasitic financial Aristocracy (creates no value, skims national surplus)

2. High value creation (employed, heavily taxed)

3. Low value creation (employed/informal economy, lightly taxed)

4. No value creation (unemployed, dependent)

In the conventional view, the wealthy subsidize the poor via taxes and donations to charity (i.e. noblesse oblige). But the conventional framework ignores the key question of where the wealthy obtained their fortunes, and the consequences of that wealth acquisition on the larger economy.

What we need to consider is what happens as the parasitic and dependent classes take an ever-larger share of the national surplus while the classes creating most of the value decline in size and political influence.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

http://www.oftwominds.com/blogjan13/4-classes01-13.html

It is no good wasting money &quot;going after&quot; only one segment of users or abusers IMO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<em>America&#8217;s Four Socioeconomic Classes </p>
<p>1. Parasitic financial Aristocracy (creates no value, skims national surplus)</p>
<p>2. High value creation (employed, heavily taxed)</p>
<p>3. Low value creation (employed/informal economy, lightly taxed)</p>
<p>4. No value creation (unemployed, dependent)</p>
<p>In the conventional view, the wealthy subsidize the poor via taxes and donations to charity (i.e. noblesse oblige). But the conventional framework ignores the key question of where the wealthy obtained their fortunes, and the consequences of that wealth acquisition on the larger economy.</p>
<p>What we need to consider is what happens as the parasitic and dependent classes take an ever-larger share of the national surplus while the classes creating most of the value decline in size and political influence.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oftwominds.com/blogjan13/4-classes01-13.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oftwominds.com/blogjan13/4-classes01-13.html</a></p>
<p>It is no good wasting money &#8220;going after&#8221; only one segment of users or abusers IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mcguire</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/01/29/committees-advance-bills-requiring-drug-screens-of-welfare-recipients/#comment-27525</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mcguire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/?p=16645#comment-27525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@2

  Totally agree. And the fact is most drugs are only in the system for a short time. Mainly pot smokers would get caught. And even then, their are flush products on the market that could even hide that.600,000 grand for nothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@2</p>
<p>  Totally agree. And the fact is most drugs are only in the system for a short time. Mainly pot smokers would get caught. And even then, their are flush products on the market that could even hide that.600,000 grand for nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: applewood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/01/29/committees-advance-bills-requiring-drug-screens-of-welfare-recipients/#comment-27516</link>
		<dc:creator>applewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/?p=16645#comment-27516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posts 1,2 &amp;3...Couldn`t have said it better myself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posts 1,2 &amp;3&#8230;Couldn`t have said it better myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/01/29/committees-advance-bills-requiring-drug-screens-of-welfare-recipients/#comment-27456</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 04:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/?p=16645#comment-27456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$587,000+ for drug testing? What happened to our spending problem?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$587,000+ for drug testing? What happened to our spending problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Hill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/01/29/committees-advance-bills-requiring-drug-screens-of-welfare-recipients/#comment-27427</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/?p=16645#comment-27427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time to drug test politicians who are also paid with our taxes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to drug test politicians who are also paid with our taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/2013/01/29/committees-advance-bills-requiring-drug-screens-of-welfare-recipients/#comment-27425</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/politics/?p=16645#comment-27425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About time. I have to take a drug test to work, and pay the taxes that they gobble up. 
 Maybe without drugs they will realize that there are jobs out there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About time. I have to take a drug test to work, and pay the taxes that they gobble up.<br />
 Maybe without drugs they will realize that there are jobs out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
