Tourney talk and TechPosted Feb27, 2008 at 02:48 PMYou want your email inbox to fill up as a columnist? Write an NCAA tournament bubble column. Presto. Filled. Simple as that. My take that Virginia Tech still needs three wins to get in generated a variety of responses this morning. From Jason in McLean, Va.: "First of all-if we go 10-6, we're in, win or lose in the ACC tourney. Just no way to dispute that. Leave a 9-7 ACC team behind, yes, it has happened before, but not 10-6 and that's not going to happen this year either. Not to mention, our RPI would be in the mid-40s (RPI factors in win-streak and we would've beat a top 25 RPI Clemson team). You should check out realtimerpi.com so you can get more up-to-date info than citing "Sunday's RPI" for a Wednesday article (even if it was written last night)." More on this a bit later. From Brett in Washington, D.C.: "I think it's time to give VT a new nickname attributed to success in all sports: 'Defense U.' Think about it....football, nuff said. Basketball? We wouldn't have won like we have this year or the past 2 years if the defense wasn't nasty. Soccer? I hear a very stingy defense as well. Don't know about baseball. Nonetheless, it's just funny how Greenberg has taken the 'business model,' if you will, of the football team, and applied it directly to basketball. Awesome coaching. Defense U. We take pride in defense." I have no doubt Brett -- a devoted Tech fan and frequent emailer, particularly during football season -- makes good money as a financial analyst in the big city, but I think he'd do all right for himself in this business, too. And even my own colleague threw in his two cents. Mark Berman, our Virginia Tech men's basketball beat writer, sent me this in reference to the column: "So what if no ACC team has been left out at 10-6? Sure, back when ACC had 9 teams and everyone played Duke and UNC twice, a 10-6 record meant something. But in the watered down 12-team ACC we have now, a 10-6 mark does not mean the same thing as it used to because teams' schedules aren't the same." That's the main reason I think Tech needs at least one win in the tournament, too. Although I stand by my assertion that leaving them out at 10-6 would be historic. Probably not unfair. But by definition, historic. Here is ESPN's updated take on the bubble situation. And, as usual, here is a fresh piece of fake news for all to enjoy. -- Aaron McFarling |
.....Advertisement.....
|

Comments
[February 28, 2008 11:35 AM]
Greg BowyerIf you had told anyone that the Hokies would still be in the NCAA picture on March 1, they would have thought you were crazy. McFarling nailed it on the head -- win 3 more straight and they are in. Beating Wake, Clemson, and another good team in the tourney quarters will not be easy for a young team. But all any ACC team, not named the Blue Devils or Tar Heels, can really ask this time of year is to have "control of your own destiny." I sure will be rooting for them.
I like the Defense U comment by Brett in DC...intense and relentless. Too bad it does not translate to the offensive side on the ball in football. Tech lacks that kind of passion from the offensive coaching staff...OC and QB Coach. Unlike Foster, those two guys offer no inspiration at all.
Sorry for the detour into football, but some will understand. Football is 24/7/365 and basketball is 12/4/180. Maybe Greenberg is on the way to changing my mindset. I can't wait for 2009 and 2010 in both sports! The Hokies really have a chance to raise the bar on the national scene.
[February 28, 2008 2:13 PM]
FredFor what it's worth, I think Aaron is right. Even if Tech wins out to finish 10-6 in the ACC, an 0-1 ACC tourney performance lands them in the NIT.
Here is their resume (rankings as of right now, and assuming they were to win the remaining 2 games):
Pros: 10-6 in ACC (#1 conference according to RPI); quality road win over Clemson; strong finish (7-3 in last 10 regular season)
Cons: Bad non-conference losses- Richmond (RPI 106), Old Dominion (111), and Penn State (159); only 1 win vs. RPI Top 50; marginal RPI; 39-pt. loss to UNC on national TV in mid-February; all non-conference wins against teams with very low RPI
Even with 1 win in the ACC tourney, it's still a shaky case. They would need some help (i.e., losses) from other ACC teams (Maryland, Wake Forest) and other bubble teams seeking the limited at-large spots.
Of course, they could just win the ACC tourney and be done with all of this... :-)