Coming Up

In the market for a new home? Don’t miss the Open House guide in the paper Saturday and Sunday.

Relief for Roanoke County schools

Supervisors and legislators should support a request to boost the meals tax to bolster the education budget.

Roanoke County leaders need more money for their schools, and a solution is staring them in the face.

Unfortunately, they’ll still need to take a road trip to Richmond to make it happen.

Continue reading this editorial.

Join the conversation [ADD A COMMENT]

5 COMMENTS

  1. don | November 5, 2012 at 2:25 pm

    I think the meals tax is a great idea. We have the best school system in the country right here in Roanoke County and we want to keep it that way.

  2. Eric Andrew | November 5, 2012 at 2:52 pm

    This should only be considered if and only if all unnecessary expenditures are cut from the budget. Not niceties, things that are not necessary to education. Any “scoial service” functions should be budgeted and funded as such and not through the education budget.

  3. Jim Lucas | November 5, 2012 at 5:24 pm

    Once again, the RTEB….never met a tax they didn’t like.

    Has it ever occured to those that promote (increasing) such taxes why there is a budget shortage? By definition the powers that be are spending too much, and/or tax revenues fall short due to lower than expected economic activity (tax base).

    Once again, the “solution”?….raise the tax rate. Pray tell, how does taxing activity increase the tax base?

    It doesn’t. Ir reduces it. Necessitating future tax rate increse.

    A secondary issue, to the economic one, is the control factor. No, I don’t see Roanoke County in black helocopters, but the idea of greater government & higher control of individuals through taxation….is another concept the RTEB has never (rarely) disliked.

  4. Christina Nuckols | November 5, 2012 at 5:54 pm

    Do you think the county is spending too much on its schools? What would you cut?

  5. Jim Lucas | November 5, 2012 at 9:12 pm

    Christina….my manifest point was not whether RO CO spends too much on schools, but a broader point of, not just the immediate nature of raising revenue, but longer term sustainability.

    If this increase is not enough, then what? How many increases in the meals taxes before the goose lays no more golden eggs? If economic activity already does not produce “needed” revenue….what is the ultimate end of further reducing such avtivity? Other than higher (and higher) taxes? A vicious cycle.

    As to your questions….yes, to your first. As to your second, it is predicated by the first, as it is the manifest question.

Error submitting comment

Name is required

A valid email is required (test@test.com)

Comment is required

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published.
All fields are required to comment.

processing

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Weather Journal

Wet weekend here; chasers’ big day

Sat, 18 May 2013 13:51:15 +0000

.....Advertisement.....

.....Daily Deal.....


Recent Comments

  • Scott M.: @20 Herb, you say, “Here is the problem I have. If the male wants to keep the child he has no choice....
  • Scott M.: Jim Lucas, I don’t think your description of an economy is right. For one, the Fed HAS BEEN printing...
  • Al: e william…the writers also made it possible to make changes to the Constitution, I see no change (aka...
  • Scott M.: @24 Joe Painter, you say, “Oh yes, it was in Griswold v. Connecticut that the Court “found” the...
  • Scott M.: This was an excellent commentary.

Categories

Archives