Check It Out

Looking for something to do this holiday weekend? See our picks for some fun local events.

Wednesday letters

Contraceptives, deficits and television in today’s letters to the editor.

Pick of the day: The elephant that ISN’T in the room

I want my party back. This country needs my party back.

I’m talking about the Republican Party I supported for years – the party that first identified pollution as a major threat and helped to create the Environmental Protection Agency.

The party that first identified the need for health insurance for all Americans.

The party that would never embrace (still less, attempt to legislate) easy fixes to complex social problems.

And the party that, more than anything else, was renowned for sound business leaders – people who understood investment, who knew how to create and manage budgets, and who were far too smart to subscribe to phony schemes that wrote off increased revenues in the face of increased costs.

Where are these cool-headed leaders when America has never needed them more?

I was in Greece last summer, and believe me, we do not want our country to be where those citizens are.

We must put America’s fiscal house in order.

But we will never do it by tying our leaders’ hands with “no new tax” pledges.

I want my party back!

Maybe if we all call loud enough, the grand old elephant will come out from wherever he’s been hiding.

JUDY CLARK

ROANOKE

Join the conversation [ADD A COMMENT]

12 COMMENTS

  1. tass | November 28, 2012 at 6:05 pm

    Hear hear, Judy!

  2. dave | November 28, 2012 at 7:32 pm

    The Repiblicans have no more Linwood Holtons, Caldwell Butlers, John Daltons, Everett Dirksens, Jack Kemps, Bob Doles, Gerald Fords, men of honor and integrity who understood the political process and had the best interests of the state and the ountry at heart.

  3. Jim Lucas | November 28, 2012 at 8:57 pm

    #2 Right. And Terry McAuliffe for governor.

  4. Michael | November 29, 2012 at 7:59 am

    #2 – “… men of honor and integrity who understood the political process and had the best interests of the state and the ountry at heart.”

    And we ALL know that the Democratic party is full of them, Right dave?

  5. Sandi Saunders | November 29, 2012 at 9:10 am

    Well at least you don’t make any “snide remarks” here like I do, Michael.

  6. Michael | November 29, 2012 at 9:36 am

    Nothing snide about it, Sandi. It’s sarcasm.

    Look it up.

  7. gdad | November 29, 2012 at 10:55 am

    #6 Michael, buddy, sarcastic and snide remarks have the same intent, to embarrass, humiliate or verbally cut somebody. So call it what you want.

  8. Michael | November 29, 2012 at 11:39 am

    My comment wasn’t intended to embarass, humiliate, or verbally cut Dave, gdad. It was pointing out that the Dems aren’t as perfect as you all like to make them out to be.

    Had it been, you can bet your last dollar the mods here wouldn’t have allowed it to be posted.

    Thanks for playing, though.

  9. Sandi Saunders | November 29, 2012 at 12:18 pm

    I took your advice, given your denial, it wasn’t “sarcasm” either.

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sarcasm

    a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain

  10. Michael | November 29, 2012 at 12:44 pm

    #9 You and gdad must rely on the same dictionary.

    Again, it wasn’t intended as a “cut” to dave. If it were, I would have stated it as such…and the mods wouldn’t have allowed it.

    Have a nice day, Sandi.

  11. Sandi Saunders | November 29, 2012 at 1:00 pm

    Excellent point Michael, we all know the moderators never let a snide remark or a “cut” through the system.

  12. Sandi Saunders | November 29, 2012 at 1:03 pm

    I can’t speak for Gdad, but I ALWAYS consult Merriam-Webster when in question, and I allow for the multiple meanings and nuance of words as well as whom they are from to inform my opinion and response.

    But I think “cutting” is often found elsewhere too.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sarcasm

Error submitting comment

Name is required

A valid email is required (test@test.com)

Comment is required

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published.
All fields are required to comment.

processing

Sunday, May 26, 2013

Weather Journal

Summerlike warmth next week

Sun, 26 May 2013 01:28:40 +0000




.....Daily Deal.....


Recent Comments

  • John R: The Cold War with the Soviet Union lasted 50 years and wasn’t over until the USSR dissolved. Tell me...
  • Jim Lucas: #4 Mrs. Saunders, you are of course correct. What counts is trivial picking at fundamental historical...
  • Al: Sandi, ever watch tv. The talking heads on MSNBC blame all opposition to Obama and his agenda to racism! It...
  • Al: At least none of their baggage cost 4 people their lives. Maybe reporters should spend time and effort getting to...
  • Al: This was a biography of Nathaniel…was there another point?

Categories

Archives