<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here we go again and again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2012/12/here-we-go-again-and-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2012/12/here-we-go-again-and-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:47:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2012/12/here-we-go-again-and-again/#comment-152873</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/?p=35675#comment-152873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jessee, you&#039;re not alone. Your points are just not echoed here. The four year drumbeat of &quot;tax the rich and all will be well&quot; has worked as planned. Where are the editorials wondering why are spending cuts not even mentioned? (That is rhetorical as you know.) Somehow too many people think an extra $67 billion in taxes will take care of the trillion plus annual deficits and take a big chunk out of the $16T debt. Go figure...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jessee, you&#8217;re not alone. Your points are just not echoed here. The four year drumbeat of &#8220;tax the rich and all will be well&#8221; has worked as planned. Where are the editorials wondering why are spending cuts not even mentioned? (That is rhetorical as you know.) Somehow too many people think an extra $67 billion in taxes will take care of the trillion plus annual deficits and take a big chunk out of the $16T debt. Go figure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
