<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday letters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2013/01/thursday-letters-90/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2013/01/thursday-letters-90/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:01:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott M.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2013/01/thursday-letters-90/#comment-157124</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 02:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/?p=36280#comment-157124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2013/01/thursday-letters-90/#comment-157121</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 01:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/?p=36280#comment-157121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#62 - &quot;Michael, I didn’t say all people.&quot;

You&#039;re right Scott, you didn&#039;t. You said &quot;most&quot;.

I think you&#039;re wrong. 

No offense, but I think I&#039;m a bit more in touch with those that support the 2nd Amendment than you are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#62 &#8211; &#8220;Michael, I didn’t say all people.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right Scott, you didn&#8217;t. You said &#8220;most&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re wrong. </p>
<p>No offense, but I think I&#8217;m a bit more in touch with those that support the 2nd Amendment than you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott M.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2013/01/thursday-letters-90/#comment-157118</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/?p=36280#comment-157118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael, I didn&#039;t say all people.  Still, I think you&#039;d be surprised.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, I didn&#8217;t say all people.  Still, I think you&#8217;d be surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2013/01/thursday-letters-90/#comment-157106</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/?p=36280#comment-157106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#60 - If you think people are going to willingly give up their guns because the gov&#039;t tells them to, then you are sadly mistaken, Scott.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#60 &#8211; If you think people are going to willingly give up their guns because the gov&#8217;t tells them to, then you are sadly mistaken, Scott.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott M.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2013/01/thursday-letters-90/#comment-157104</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 21:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/?p=36280#comment-157104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@59 Michael, don&#039;t be silly.  Most citizens are law abiding and would give up their guns if that were the law.  Those that didn&#039;t, when found to have them, would be fined or something.

But still, you say people would die.  People die now because of guns in society.  Is one form of dying better/worse than the other?  At least in the gov&#039;t taking guns scenario, there&#039;s fewer and fewer guns available for hurting people.

If people are going to die because we have guns and people are going to die if we take them, I vote we take them because fewer and fewer people would die from them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@59 Michael, don&#8217;t be silly.  Most citizens are law abiding and would give up their guns if that were the law.  Those that didn&#8217;t, when found to have them, would be fined or something.</p>
<p>But still, you say people would die.  People die now because of guns in society.  Is one form of dying better/worse than the other?  At least in the gov&#8217;t taking guns scenario, there&#8217;s fewer and fewer guns available for hurting people.</p>
<p>If people are going to die because we have guns and people are going to die if we take them, I vote we take them because fewer and fewer people would die from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2013/01/thursday-letters-90/#comment-157099</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 21:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/?p=36280#comment-157099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#58 - My point, Scott, is that people are going to die on both sides when the gov&#039;t tries to take away the guns.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#58 &#8211; My point, Scott, is that people are going to die on both sides when the gov&#8217;t tries to take away the guns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott M.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2013/01/thursday-letters-90/#comment-157088</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/?p=36280#comment-157088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@57 Michael, as long as we&#039;re pretending, I assume it would be enforced the same way speeding tickets are enforced.  The police obviously can&#039;t catch every speeder but when they do, the law is enforced.

By analogy, I don&#039;t expect everyone to turn their guns in even if it were made illegal.  But when illegal guns are found, they&#039;re confiscated and destroyed.  I suppose part of your assumption is that no other AR-15s are being made to replace the destroyed ones.  Eventually almost all the AR-15s are removed from society.  As ammunition is used up, it&#039;s not replaced, etc.

Would I support a door to door confiscation?  No.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s feasible.

Not sure what this has to do with Ruby Ridge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@57 Michael, as long as we&#8217;re pretending, I assume it would be enforced the same way speeding tickets are enforced.  The police obviously can&#8217;t catch every speeder but when they do, the law is enforced.</p>
<p>By analogy, I don&#8217;t expect everyone to turn their guns in even if it were made illegal.  But when illegal guns are found, they&#8217;re confiscated and destroyed.  I suppose part of your assumption is that no other AR-15s are being made to replace the destroyed ones.  Eventually almost all the AR-15s are removed from society.  As ammunition is used up, it&#8217;s not replaced, etc.</p>
<p>Would I support a door to door confiscation?  No.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s feasible.</p>
<p>Not sure what this has to do with Ruby Ridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2013/01/thursday-letters-90/#comment-157079</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/?p=36280#comment-157079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#56 - You&#039;re right, Scott. I used the word &quot;pretend&quot;.

It&#039;s a perfectly reasonable question.

If millions decided not to obey the law, what do you think should be done about it?

Disregard if it&#039;s feasible or not. Again, we&#039;re pretending. The government comes out tomorrow, says it&#039;s illegal to own an AR-15, and citizens have to turn theirs in. People say &quot;No!&quot;

Now what?

It would appear from your reply that you would support a door-to-door confiscation.

Does Ruby Ridge ring a bell?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#56 &#8211; You&#8217;re right, Scott. I used the word &#8220;pretend&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a perfectly reasonable question.</p>
<p>If millions decided not to obey the law, what do you think should be done about it?</p>
<p>Disregard if it&#8217;s feasible or not. Again, we&#8217;re pretending. The government comes out tomorrow, says it&#8217;s illegal to own an AR-15, and citizens have to turn theirs in. People say &#8220;No!&#8221;</p>
<p>Now what?</p>
<p>It would appear from your reply that you would support a door-to-door confiscation.</p>
<p>Does Ruby Ridge ring a bell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott M.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2013/01/thursday-letters-90/#comment-157074</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/?p=36280#comment-157074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@54 Michael, you&#039;re asking me to answer a question as if that were realistically feasible and it&#039;s not.

First, if millions said &#039;no&#039;, you&#039;d have to ask Obama what should be done instead of me.

Second, I think, even if that&#039;s what he wanted to do, he&#039;d know it&#039;s not feasible.  You&#039;d have to approach the problem in an entirely different way.  You&#039;d need a public education and public relations campaign.  You&#039;d have to get laws passed that made confiscation of the AR-15&#039;s legal if a person was found to have one.

If you&#039;re looking for me to say the army or national guard or police should do a house to house sweep, I&#039;d have because that&#039;s just not practical.  I know some on the right (and maybe the left) fear that&#039;s what Obama wants to do but it&#039;s just not practical.

Still, have your &quot;military grade&quot; weapons destroyed if you&#039;re not using them is probably a good idea.  But as I&#039;ve shown, you can&#039;t turn them into the Virginia police with that intend as they have to turn around and sell them by law.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@54 Michael, you&#8217;re asking me to answer a question as if that were realistically feasible and it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>First, if millions said &#8216;no&#8217;, you&#8217;d have to ask Obama what should be done instead of me.</p>
<p>Second, I think, even if that&#8217;s what he wanted to do, he&#8217;d know it&#8217;s not feasible.  You&#8217;d have to approach the problem in an entirely different way.  You&#8217;d need a public education and public relations campaign.  You&#8217;d have to get laws passed that made confiscation of the AR-15&#8242;s legal if a person was found to have one.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking for me to say the army or national guard or police should do a house to house sweep, I&#8217;d have because that&#8217;s just not practical.  I know some on the right (and maybe the left) fear that&#8217;s what Obama wants to do but it&#8217;s just not practical.</p>
<p>Still, have your &#8220;military grade&#8221; weapons destroyed if you&#8217;re not using them is probably a good idea.  But as I&#8217;ve shown, you can&#8217;t turn them into the Virginia police with that intend as they have to turn around and sell them by law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott M.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/2013/01/thursday-letters-90/#comment-157073</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/roundtable/?p=36280#comment-157073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@54 Chuck, you may very well be right.  I&#039;m NOT a Constitutional scholar.  I thought the guys made some good points though.  Maybe we let the scholars work it out but even scholars can have an agenda.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@54 Chuck, you may very well be right.  I&#8217;m NOT a Constitutional scholar.  I thought the guys made some good points though.  Maybe we let the scholars work it out but even scholars can have an agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
