Don't Miss

Are you the Ultimate Red Sox Fan? Enter your photo in our contest and you could win fan-tastic prizes.

Monday letters

Anti-women legislators and the Founding Fathers in today’s letters to the editor.

Pick of the day: Just another amnesty offer

Re: “End immigration stalemate,” Feb. 3 editorial:

Few would not favor a “rational immigration policy”; however, what the president and various congressional groups are proposing is hardly rational and instead resembles a rerun of the 1986 amnesty that gave us the 11 million-plus illegal aliens we now have.

In 1986, we were told that 1.2 million illegal aliens would be granted citizenship and we citizens would be guaranteed strict enforcement — internal and border — to ensure another amnesty would never be needed. Instead, we got amnesty for 2.7 million people, 11 million-plus new illegal aliens, and a 27-year wait for strict enforcement.

In the new proposals, we hear much about citizenship but little about internal enforcement, such as mandatory employment verification through E-Verify. What we are likely to hear later is a proposal to “perfect” E-Verify, with a system years down the road. What happens to new illegal entrants?

What we are being offered is rolling amnesties every few years to bring the newest illegal aliens “out of the shadows” — sort of open borders on the installment plan.

We are fools if we let this happen.

DEENA FLINCHUM

BLACKSBURG

Join the conversation [ADD A COMMENT]

1 COMMENT

  1. Sandi Saunders | February 11, 2013 at 9:54 am

    Maybe Deena Flinchum, but I think we are bigger “fools” if we think we can round up and deport the millions of people who are here.

    Richard Doss, you lost credibility when you said “let’s look at what the Founding Fathers said” and proceeded to paraphrase and leave out the part you prefer to ignore. The Founders were indeed rather “brilliant and innovative” but there was a lot they were more than remiss about too, if one wants to be honest.

    You may believe that the Second Amendment is unassailable, but the truth is, like much else the Founders wrote. It is arguable as to their intent and its modern day societal impact.

    When your rights help criminals, and they do, they have to be looked at and if deemed necessary, “infringed”.

Error submitting comment

Name is required

A valid email is required (test@test.com)

Comment is required

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published.
All fields are required to comment.

processing

Monday, May 20, 2013

Weather Journal

Soupiness eases a bit

Mon, 20 May 2013 05:22:51 +0000

.....Advertisement.....

.....Daily Deal.....


Recent Comments

  • Jim Lucas: #8 Aware I am unworthy of your response (have lost much sleep) several points please. First, you change...
  • Dave Hicks: Re e william | May 19, 2013 at 7:11 pm “and Jesus’ message about “turning the other cheek”? What of...
  • Bubba Greene: Al and Jim are both on the money. I esp like Al’s comment however. And that would be the essence...
  • Dave Hicks: Re: Sandi Saunders | May 19, 2013 at 6:14 pm “I think you have deliberately misused the scripture...
  • Jim Lucas: #6 Mrs. Saunders, I am with you, as to plausible interpretation until the (your) end. There is (obviously)...

Categories

Archives