An effective leader for the EPA
Gina McCarthy has the skills to help science prevail over ideology.
Climate-change skeptics in the U.S. Senate are eager to grill Gina McCarthy, President Obama’s nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency in his second term. There could hardly be higher recommendation for the job.



Science aside…China is leaving us in its CO2 exhaust in carbon production from industry and energy generation. How could anything we do have an impact on global ..er uhhh..climate change when China won’t play along?
McCarthy does not have an ideology?
Before I answer this please tell me whether you think anthropogenic global warming and climate change are problems that require policy interventions.
Does having an ideology disqualify you from the job?
#3… I know, I know….They don`t require policy interventions because they don`t exist. And for the answer to #4….Yes…at my company you cannot have voted for obama. The ones I let go obviously wanted to `spread my wealth` and that is just none of thier concern.
#3 My question is not to you. Lacking a specific note, it is to the authors of the editorial. Answer as you wish. My answer to your question is irrelevant.
#4 Please see the title of the editorial. And yes, if by degree it prejudices your decisions. The very point I believe the RTEB means to make. But whose ox?
Paragraphs!
Wow!
Jim Lucas, did you have any concern for the “degree it prejudices your decisions” when it was an administration you agreed with making the selections?