Check It Out

The Roanoke Times iPad app has a new look and a few new features. Learn more here.

The seal of approval

lcr_1898_0310Roanoke’s historic seal (pictured here) appears to be besting the newer, though antiquated, industrial seal in the final bracket.

Public Information Officer Melinda Mayo reports that as of Wednesday afternoon, more than 500 people had clicked onto the city’s survey that seeks to gauge public support for either seal. Oddly, 16 people who clicked on the survey didn’t bother to say which one they liked better, but the remainder overwhelmingly voted for the original seal. The vote count stood at 445 to 47 as of Wednesday afternoon.

We wrote about the seals here.

City Manager Chris Morrill explained why he brought it up here.

And you can still vote for your favorite here.

Which seal gains your approval?

Join the conversation [ADD A COMMENT]

7 COMMENTS

  1. Sandi Saunders | March 21, 2013 at 12:08 pm

    I didn’t vote because I am not a City Resident and it is none of my business. I do prefer the old seal because the new one is too frenetic and I dislike the color.

  2. 89Hoo | March 21, 2013 at 1:56 pm

    I like the old (new) one better too, for the reasons Sandi mentioned. Also not a city resident.

  3. Name Withheld | March 21, 2013 at 2:02 pm

    The new coin should have the H&C Coffee Sign on one side and the Dr. Pepper sign on the other. The slogan should be “living in the past” preferably in Latin, because after all that’s a dead language.

    If it has to be the seal that’s pictured, maybe the scales of justice should have Victory Stadium on one side and the Art Museum on the other. The choo choo train is a nice backward-looking touch.

  4. 89Hoo | March 21, 2013 at 4:00 pm

    3 – that’s funny. I had the thought that the train is running in the wrong direction.

  5. Jim Lucas | March 21, 2013 at 6:08 pm

    Railroads became the new (no pun intended) rivers. Cities like Roanoke (little Pittsburgh?) would not exist if not as the confluence of such man-made rivers.

    Why the animosity?

  6. Name Withheld | March 21, 2013 at 8:27 pm

    #5 I have no beef with rail. I just don’t think the future of Roanoke rests on it the way its past did. I think if we could turn back the clock we would have continued to develop rail along with the interstate system.

  7. Jim Lucas | March 21, 2013 at 9:27 pm

    #6 Well, NW (now that’sironic) lord knows I would never be argumentative. But your #3 struck me, and in other ways, a bit more flippant.

    As far as the highway confluence you speak of, that would be Wytheville…..and I don’t think Roanoke lacks from tributaries.

Error submitting comment

Name is required

A valid email is required (test@test.com)

Comment is required

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published.
All fields are required to comment.

processing

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Weather Journal

Some severe storm risk thru Thurs.

Wed, 22 May 2013 13:19:25 +0000




.....Daily Deal.....


Recent Comments

  • Michael: #34 – Resent it all you want, but c’mon, Sandi, we all know how much you despise George Bush and...
  • Sandi Saunders: Great initiative Bubba! How many times did someone from the Bush, Clinton or Reagan administration...
  • Sandi Saunders: I would never be the one “demanding people be waterboarded” and I resent that...
  • Sandi Saunders: A new low! And that is saying something.
  • Art Hill: My, Foxwatchers are easily led. They distort, we deride.

Categories

Archives