Win tickets to see the smash hit musical Mamma Mia at the Roanoke Civic Center. Two winners will each receive four tickets!
A small man can be just as exhausted as a great man.
What’s on your mind this weekend?
View our commenting policy and standards | Commenting FAQ | Report a problem
Subject: “So how are they really different from us?”, by Sandy Sanders
Here is different from us example number 2
And while I do not intend to do multiple posts every day I think this one stands in a category alone. Yesterday’s example was distressing. After this one, I did not sleep at all for several days. It was sickening to most all AMERICANS. So recall that day and know this is offered as reason #3. How are they different from us, indeed!
Open Thread ? We`ll see……Well, your beloved Obamacare is on its way. I, for one, cannot wait until approximately 6 months from now. The look on the faces of the fools that back this train wreck will be priceless. Yes, Health care reform is most certainly needed, but Obamacare is absolutely the wrong way to go about it. We know that `single-payer` is the target of the left(for some sick reason) but, when Obamacare falls on its face, why would anyone ever trust the Government again when it comes to anything involving Health care……They won`t.
E.W. Jackson stated that the left is `anti-God`….Why would he say that ? Could it be that the left backs genocide of unborn children…..the laying of 2 men together…….the taking of God from our public schools ? Satan truly loves the aforementioned. Maybe E.W. is onto something.
Poster being carried by an African-American at the most recent MLK rally…“He had a dream and we got a nightmare“ (with a pic of Obama beside `nightmare`) finally glad to see that the African-Americans are waking up to reality.
Don’t be so one sided.
If that idiot Jackson had half a brain, he’d quote the entire Bible to support his dictatorship beliefs. For that matter, you should as well unless you only choose to quote those that suit only your needs.
I looked up the definition of stupidity and low and behold, I believe it was the likeness of Jackson beside it.
Jackson has no more clue about who is Godless than the next one. The main difference between the left and right on abortion is that those on the left will take care of the unwanted and destitute after they’re born. The right calls them liberals and continues to kick them even as children.
#6 – “…the left will take care of the unwanted and destitute after they’re born. The right calls them liberals and continues to kick them even as children.”
Hmmm…I’ve given a lot of money to charities to help the poor and also done a lot of volunteer service.
Ya really should come up with better ways to slam those on the right, Will, especially since the ones you are using simply aren’t true.
Oh really Michael?
Which side of the aisle continually bemoans and condemns social programs that are charged with the responsibility of taking care of children?
In their efforts to stop social welfare, the right condemns the children of those who have been born to mothers and fathers who never wanted them in the first place.
I’m glad you donate, but donations alone will not help the situation other than to provide a feel good moment and a tax deduction at the end of the year for some.
And frankly Michael, I don’t really need to do any thing to “slam” the right. All I have to do is let them walk and talk. They take care of that task all by themselves for the most part.
#8 – If you look carefully, Will, and set aside your hatred of the right for a moment, you’ll see that it isn’t the programs themselves that are being condemned…it’s usually the wasteful spending and fraudulent practices of the programs participants.
“…the right condemns the children of those who have been born to mothers and fathers who never wanted them in the first place.”
Really, Will? Really? Show me an example of the right actually condemning the children. Facts, please.
Do you remember a little document called “The Republican Contract with America?” I believe that document was authored by numerous noted Republicans including one Newt Gingrich.
Within the body of that document was a chapter called The Personal Responsibility Act. The act was drafted in such a way as to cut off federal aid to the children of unwed teen-aged mothers and to those children whose paternity wasn’t establised.
Move forward to a vote within the House Ways and Means Committee wherein a part of a bill moved forward that said children born to unwed mothers would be ineligible for any Federal Welfare Benefits for 18 years.
Now…if you’re wanting to punish the parents…that’s one thing…but tell me how on God’s green earth is an infant going to be able to survive? If that’s not a condemnation of a child to a life of abject hardship and neglect through no fault of their own…I’m not sure what is.
What’s wrong with making people aware, who are possibly on welfare/Medicaid already, that if a child is created the federal government won’t be held responsible to feed it?
And because of adoption, I don’t think that is condemning a child to abject hardship.
#11 – I haven’t read the “Contract with America”, Will, and since I think Gingrich is not a typical member of the right, I doubt if I ever will read it.
Guess I’ll have to take your word on what it says, though based on your dislike of the right, I suspect it’s probably biased.
Name is required
A valid email is required (email@example.com)
Comment is required
Your email address will not be published.All fields are required to comment.
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:38:43 +0000