March 29, 2007For Sunday: Bush proposes to cut National Cancer Institute fundingAs the nation's attention has been fixed on the cancer cases of two high-profile individuals, Elizabeth Edwards and Tony Snow, a troubling bit of info has seeped out: President George Bush's proposed 2008 fiscal year budget calls for an estimated $11 million reduction in funding for the National Cancer Institute, the federal government's principal agency for cancer research and training. Granted, the cut represents a small portion of the $4.78 billion Bush has earmarked for NCI in his proposed spending plan. But he makes this baffling proposal as the number of new cancer cases in inching upward, from 1,334,100 in 2003 to 1,399,7790 in 2006, according to the American Cancer Society. That number is expected to reach 1,444,920 this year. Now certainly is not the time to reduce funding for cancer research. |
SearchQuick Thought
Recent comments
Monthly archivesCategories
Latest columnsToday's editorials
Letters to the editorAbout this blogThe Roanoke Times editorial staff engages readers in a respectful dialogue and exchange of opinion, including our virtual editorial board where you can discuss tomorrow's editorials today. Read more about the editorial staff .....Advertisement.....
|
March 29, 2007
For Sunday: Bush proposes to cut National Cancer Institute funding
As the nation's attention has been fixed on the cancer cases of two high-profile individuals, Elizabeth Edwards and Tony Snow, a troubling bit of info has seeped out:
President George Bush's proposed 2008 fiscal year budget calls for an estimated $11 million reduction in funding for the National Cancer Institute, the federal government's principal agency for cancer research and training.
Granted, the cut represents a small portion of the $4.78 billion Bush has earmarked for NCI in his proposed spending plan. But he makes this baffling proposal as the number of new cancer cases in inching upward, from 1,334,100 in 2003 to 1,399,7790 in 2006, according to the American Cancer Society. That number is expected to reach 1,444,920 this year.
Now certainly is not the time to reduce funding for cancer research.
Comments
[March 29, 2007 4:08 PM]
JoshBut here's the part the editorial staff conveniently leaves out.
In previous years, Institutes and Centers contributed a uniform percentage of their appropriations to the Common Fund. Since NCI no longer has to contribute to the Common Fund, the Institute will effectively receive an increase of $46 million.
But, alas, that small detail doesn't fit the template you want for Bush, does it?
[March 29, 2007 6:13 PM]
JohnSJosh, you're not supposed to use math selectively.
JS
[March 30, 2007 11:34 AM]
BUDIt would seem that if what JOSH says is true, the editorial board has distorted a Bush Admin. policy. Is it ignorance or a deliberate lie?... someone's got some splaining to do.
[March 30, 2007 12:50 PM]
MarkOIn a snap shot of congress and Bush's appropriations go to this site: Friends of Cancer Research