...Advertisement...

...Advertisement...

Toward better television news

The New Yorker has a piece on Katie Couric's imminent departure from CBS News. I haven't bothered with network (or cable news, for that matter) for a very long time, so I read over most of the article. But I was struck by a suggestion by the writer, Nancy Franklin:

Who knows, young people might turn on their TVs in droves if news organizations had a few choice strands of Michael Moore’s DNA in them, and pointed out when, say, a public official wasn’t telling the truth. Jon Stewart is a lightning rod both for people who decry the notion that young people get their news from watching “The Daily Show,” and for people who think that his (and Stephen Colbert’s “The Colbert Report”) is the only current-events show worth watching. I’m not a Stewartite, but when Dick Cheney denies making certain statements about the war in Iraq and Stewart shows three video clips that prove he’s lying, I think he’s providing a real service to the country, and I’d like to think that that’s what his fans are responding to.

I hope my conservative friends aren't put off by the Michael Moore reference (Moore's hardly my favorite leftist provocateur; I think he tends to play nearly as fast and loose with the facts as those he criticizes). But the notion that television news ought to expose public officials for not telling the truth shouldn't be revolutionary. Once upon a time, that was one of the media's main jobs, or so I thought.

Citizens shouldn't have to go to a comedy show to see blatant lies by the president or vice president - or by the Speaker of the House or any other elected official) exposed.

Comments

# 1

[May 20, 2008 5:09 PM]

Henry

"But the notion that television news ought to expose public officials for not telling the truth shouldn't be revolutionary. Once upon a time, that was one of the media's main jobs, or so I thought."

Until Bill Clinton came along. Then it became inconvenient to do such a thing. Clinton lied constantly and the media was so bought in to his campaign that they had to give up on keeping Bill honest. Who remembers Gennifer Flowers? She had phone tapes of Clinton and the media just ignored her.

The media is doing the same with The Messiah. He is getting passes right and left for his miscues.

# 2

[May 20, 2008 6:24 PM]

Ed S.

"I think [Michael Moore] tends to play nearly as fast and loose with the facts as those he criticizes"

Very true.

# 3

[May 20, 2008 7:48 PM]

Josh

Dan doens't mean a single thing he's saying. If he did, he would say "Hmm. Let's investigate both sides of the global warming debate. Let's examine each of Algore's points, and see if everything is being looked at. Let's be curious.

Stop the lip-service, Dan. Walk the walk or else nobody believes you.

You can start with an editorial that looks at the 10 year projection of global cooling by an otherwise reliable GH adherent and say "Hmm. A ten-year cooling trend. Is it possible this whole manmade global warming forecast is wrong?"

If you want to attract young readers, be HONEST and honestly curious. Taking the leftwing party line is the reason young people don't trust the MSM.

# 4

[May 21, 2008 7:16 AM]

Josh

When I saw the title of this piece, I just knew Dan would get it wrong. Even though there are models out there in FOX and talk radio that show how you attract an audience and keep them, you can count on liberals to miss the obvious conclusion: tell the truth.

It's was the same thing with Radio Free Europe. People instinctively knew the Communists were lying to them; they flocked to the truth-tellers.

# 5

[May 25, 2008 11:16 AM]

Jim

The only lies I've been hearing are the promises that somehow life will be better under liberal Democrat leadership. I'm really going to miss Bush.

Post a comment





Search


Quick Thought

  • We're tweeting -

    The RT is now on twitter.com. To get updates and alerts about what's happening on The Roanoke Times editorial blog, click here, then click "follow." We'll send out updates when we put up the day's editorial and commentary for discussion.

  • Valid e-mail now required -

    From now on, in order to comment to The RT, we will require a valid e-mail address.

    We will conduct random checks to ensure that addresses are valid. The address you submit is not public, and not accessible to spam bots. It will not be used for any other purpose than verification.

    In addition, please remember that this is intended to be a forum for polite and respectful debate. Personal attacks against fellow commenters or the editorial page staff of The Roanoke Times will not be allowed. Address the argument, not the person.

    We will continue to delete any libelous comments.

    Thank you

  • Welcome to The RT -

    Welcome to The RT. That’s The Roanoke Times RoundTable, our new editorial page blog.

    What The RT becomes will be largely up to readers. But we envision a place for a healthy and civil dialogue among The Roanoke Times editorial page staff and the community.

    Read more.

Recent comments

  • The only lies I've been hearing are the promises that somehow life will be better ...more - Jim
  • When I saw the title of this piece, I just knew Dan would get it ...more - Josh
  • Dan doens't mean a single thing he's saying. If he did, he would say "Hmm. ...more - Josh
  • "I think [Michael Moore] tends to play nearly as fast and loose with the facts ...more - Ed S.
  • "But the notion that television news ought to expose public officials for not telling the ...more - Henry

About this blog

The Roanoke Times editorial staff engages readers in a respectful dialogue and exchange of opinion, including our virtual editorial board where you can discuss tomorrow's editorials today. Read more about the editorial staff

E-mail address for roanoke.com

RSS feed

.....Advertisement.....