THE DEATH AND LIFE OF AMERICAN JOURNALISM:
The Media Revolution That Will Begin the World Again
By Robert W. McChesney and John Nichols
Nationbooks
352 pages
$26.95
By Michael L. Ramsey
MICHAEL L. RAMSEY is president of the Roanoke Public Library Foundation.
The liberty of the press is the great bulwark of the liberty of the people: It is, therefore, the incumbent Duty of those who are constituted the Guardians of the People’s Rights to defend and maintain it.
— Massachusetts Houseof Representatives, 1768
Journalism is essential to the success of the American democratic republic. A bold assertion, perhaps.
Robert McChesney and John Nichols intend to save journalism from what they — and many others — see as an inevitable collapse. An ambitious goal, no doubt.
I live in an enclave of “extreme patriots” who brook no disagreement with their collective sociopolitical point of view. The most extreme have placed broad, black plastic tape across the fronts of their newspaper boxes — a graphic statement about their opinion of the liberal views sometimes espoused by The Roanoke Times.
But know this: A local daily newspaper is essential to personal freedom, even if you disagree with the editorial positions.
A general public discourse facilitated by a free press (journalism) is essential to the success of any democratic republic. The disappearance of daily newspapers, magazines and radio news (to cite obvious examples) is a troubling development for McChesney and Nichols.
The authors believe that all Americans should be alarmed by the prospect of losing a free and independent press. Their solution seems to fly in the face of reason: Trust the government to provide the financial underpinning to assure the freedom and independence of the news media.
Sort of like sending the fox to guard the henhouse, you say?
McChesney and Nichols cite historical precedent in arguing that it is incumbent upon elected officials to assure that journalism be spared the death many have predicted. The difficulties are many and varied.
During the Founding Era, newspapers were the only mass media available to inform citizens of the doings of the Continental Congress and the Continental Army. So there is one rather obvious difference.
During the Founding Era, the government could subsidize newspapers by allowing franking privileges so that no postage was needed to send papers throughout the colonies.
During the Founding Era, newspaper publishers could afford to churn out newspapers because of lucrative government printing contracts. Government documents (including laws and resolutions) were printed at private print shops by contract with local, colonial (state) and, later federal governments.
Now, our governments print their own documents, thus providing competition for the dollar
on which private-sector printers would pay a tax to support government enterprise. If you kill the goose, you are likely to find more golden eggs, right?
McChesney and Nichols acknowledge that difficulties exist, and they embrace that situation. After all, dialogue is the heart of a democratic republic. We don’t have to agree on a point, we just have to agree to discuss it. Compromise will follow, and then no one will be happy, and that is the soul of our government.
The book encourages us to engage in a dialogue that will bring a resolution to this problem journalism faces before we have to put the bones of a free press in an ossuary. The authors note propaganda machines would love to control the news so that “news” items would support whatever is being sold by whatever corporation is selling it. The authors make oblique reference to this issue, but the largest of these corporate giants is Federal Bureaucracy Inc.
Good for us, say McChesney and Nichols, that elected officials thrive on the lively debate encouraged by a free press — the kind of discussion that gets publicity for those we elect to solve problems such as this one.
If you are concerned about the future of journalism in America — and you should be — then this book will help you understand where we are, how we got here, and what we need to do to help the handmaiden of a democratic republic regain her strength before she collapses and dies.