I received a "media advisory" today about a school-to-prison pipeline conference that the ACLU plans to host in New York next week. Here's some of what the union has to say.
The conference notice conveniently came after an e-mail discussion with fellow education reporters about the assertion that prison populations are based on the number of students who can't read by the end of third grade.
Some of you may remember that Montgomery County School Board member Phyllis Albritton ran for election with the issue of making sure students can read on level by the end of the thirdgrade as the priority of her campaign. She's also mentioned it at public hearings and other meetings.
The validity of that statement is up for debate, although Albritton isn't alone in her thinking. As an education reporter, I've heard the same thing numerous times. Others apparently have, too.
But, after taking it to the U.S.Department of Education, no one can back up the statement. Some people think it may have originiated years ago out of a conference in California.
Either way, Tom Snyder with the DOE's Institute of Education Science, said this to a colleague,
"I don't think we have anything to support this statement since we do not have a longitudinal study that covers this age range. We do have a longitudinal study that began with 8th graders in 1988 and ended in 2000, when they were in their mid 20s. An analysis of this data set could give you some information about student pathways, but it does not provide any linkage lower than grade 8. We also have a longitudinal study of kindergarten students that covers 3rd grade, but only goes has high as 8th grade."
What do you think?