2008.09.11
Obama and McCain: Is Virginia really a swing state?
You keep hearing it, and yet, after 10 straight presidential elections in which Virginia has been a given for Republicans, it’s hard to believe that a state which hasn’t gone for a Democrat since Lyndon Johnson is really “in play.”
I’ve looked at the numbers, and I’m beginning to understand why some people do believe it.
There’s plenty of evidence that both Democrats and Republicans believe it – at least for now. When was the last time a Democratic candidate for president made more than an obligatory pass through Virginia? Not in my memory. Yet Barack Obama has made at least a half-dozen stops in the state since he secured the Democratic nomination this summer. And this week John McCain and Sarah Palin came through, too.
A recent Time/CNN poll puts McCain ahead in Virginia.
But do history and the numbers bear out the candidates' sudden interest?
Knowing the Obama camp is banking a lot on a powerful ground-game and registering voters in droves, I decided to look at voter registration in Virginia. A recent Time article reported that, “Since January alone more than 3.5 million new voters have been registered in 17 of the 23 states tracked closely by the Obama campaign where information is available.”
In Virginia, an additional 229,567 voters have registered since the last presidential election, according to data from the Virginia State Board of Elections. But 55,947, or about a quarter of those, came in the last eight weeks, between July 14 and Sept. 8.
And the mass of them came in localities that, for the most part, would seem to favor Obama.
I looked at 25 cities and counties that had the highest gains in voter registration since July. Combined, they account for 148,172 new registrations since 2004 (64.5 percent), and 44,330 since July (79.4 percent).
An interactive graph of the registration gains in the last eight weeks. The bigger the bubble, the bigger the gains.
Of those 25, Democrat John Kerry won 11 of them in the 2004 presidential race. Democract Jim Webb won 14 of them on his way to the U.S. Senate in 2006, and Democratic Gov. Tim Kaine took 19 of them on his way to the mansion 2005.
Of the top 10 Kaine won them all, and Webb won 8.
A few specifics:
Since 2004, Richmond had a net loss of 950 registered voters, but since July has picked up 6,241. Richmond is also reliably Democratic, so Obama can feel comfortable that a lot of those voters will go his way.
Virginia Beach (#2) and Loudon County (#7) are also among the big gainers. Both had been reliably Republican for years, but Loudon went for both Webb and Kaine, and Kaine took Virginia Beach, though by a slim 649 votes. Both localities have also flipped to Democrats in recent state Senate and House of Delegates races.
But that’s only a few of the 134 cities and counties in Virginia. What about other parts of the state, like the southwest? Obama’s poor performance in Appalachia is well-documented – Hillary Clinton absolutely crushed him there in Virginia, West Virginia and Kentucky. And even popular state Democrats haven’t run especially well there. Moreover, there's anecdotal evidence that voters there don't care for Obama, as reported in The Roanoke Times.
My friends who cover politics like to say it’s all about margins. You have to run so well in places where you win, that you overcome the votes you don’t get in places where you lose.
So, what’s the potential margin in Southwest? In the 13 localities that make up the narrow western tip of the state, George W. Bush beat Kerry by a total of 32,574 votes. George Allen beat Webb there by 15,286 votes, and Jerry Kilgore, who is from one of those counties (Scott) beat Kaine there by 22,056 votes.
Those are margins easily overcome by big wins elsewhere. Kaine won Richmond – his hometown – by 27,000 votes. He and Webb both won Fairfax County by more than 60,000 votes. There just aren't that many people living in Southwest Virginia, compared to the state capital, Northern Virginia, or Tidewater.
Of course, there’s lots, lots more to consider – and it’s not nearly all favorable to Obama.
Voters came out in huge numbers in the Virginia Democratic primary, indicating the swell of Democratic enthusiasm across the country was at work here, too. In 2004, 396,223 people voted in the Democratic primary. This year, 986,203 voted – compared to 489,252 in the Republican primary.
On the other hand, McCain seems to have closed the so-called “enthusiasm gap” with the addition of Palin to his ticket. Nationwide polls have the race a dead-heat or have McCain slightly ahead now.
Some of these apparent gains for Obama through voter registration are negated by substantial registration gains in Republican friendly spots like Chesterfield and Stafford counties.
There’s also McCain’s military experience and how that will play in Tidewater, where large numbers of voters are connected to the military. That edge for McCain could be countered by Obama’s popularity among blacks. Obama’s largest margins over Clinton in the primary were in localities with substantial black populations. Places like Hampton and Newport News are especially interesting. Both have strong military ties and substantial black populations.
Finally, Virginians don’t vote the same way in presidential elections as they do in, say, a race for governor. We’ve had several Democratic governors through those years when we still turned red in presidential elections. In that regard, Virginia has to swing a long way to reach Obama. Kerry lost here by about 260,000 votes.
Can a state the size of Virginia even matter that much? Well, consider this. If Obama can hold onto the states John Kerry won in 2004 (which, of course, is no guarantee, but it’s a starting point for discussion), and he can pick up Virginia and its 13 electoral college votes, and one other battleground state, say, Colorado and its 9, or Ohio and its 20, he’s won the presidency.







With the vast numbers of uninformed voters out there, it's heartening to see the Commonwealth getting a little better informed. Granted, we had the disastrous Gilmore administration and dopey Allen administration to help get the ball rolling.
Still, I like living in a state that is steadily moving forward.
Thanks, Matt, for an informative read.
Comment by chrisbone — September 11, 2008 @ 2:17 pm
In addition to the states Kerry won in 2004, Obama only needs VA plus Iowa to win. He doesn't need Ohio or Florida and he is way up in Iowa. We just have to deliver VA.
Comment by Todd Smyth — September 11, 2008 @ 2:38 pm
The difference between Roanoke City and Roanoke County increase shows about 200 more in the City. Of course this could be due to the City being more transient. This will be a nail biter. Palin has thrown an interesting curve ball into the equation.
Comment by Valerie — September 16, 2008 @ 2:10 pm
You hear it every election, same trype from liberals like this one. It's September, and the Democrats are imploding, that's nothing new. This one should have been the DEMS by a mile, but if anybody can blow it - it's these guys. Yes, the Republicans are dumb, but the DEMS are dumber. Dumb and dumber = DUMB always wins. Media does fulllewinsky, Obama loses. Ho-hum, business as usual.
sad, but true.
Comment by gene wiley — September 16, 2008 @ 2:10 pm
from anecdotal evidence democrats are a lot more enthusiastic for obama than they were for kerry and gore.
at the end of the day, mccain is on the top of the ticket and he just does not excite the republican base that much. They don't know which side of an issue he will take since he has reversed positions on nearly everything including torture, immigration and taxes.
his own economic advisor said mccain would raise taxes, and the only reason
they are not advertising it is because they don't want to tarnish the Repblican brand. This is going to cause a HUGE UPROAR.
(See the Time Magazine blog).
Comment by Ni — September 16, 2008 @ 2:11 pm
Really good run-down of the low-down, thanks!
Who knows what's in the cards. But I do know one thing about Virginians... they pick great men (or women I guess). I have no doubt Virginians will be able to tell the difference between something authentic and something phony. I mean, come on, J-McC was just making fun of Obama a month ago comparing him sarcastically to the good Lord himself! He was Mister-No-Celebrity and Mister-Experience. Come on man. Don't hijack someone else's ideas if they're working for the other guy better. Seriously.
Comment by Matt Jarvis — September 16, 2008 @ 2:11 pm
Everyone that supports Sarah Palin and John Mccain must be very much concerned about the newly registered voters in Virginia. 200,000 votes could have changed the 2004 election to favor John Kerry.We now have 229,567 new voters. John McCain and Sarah Palin will NEED every voter who stayed home in 2004 to carry Virginia. If you know a potential voter you have until October 6th to get them registered to carry Virginia for John McCain and Sarah Palin. REGISTER NOW TO VOTE!
Comment by Ray Roberts — September 16, 2008 @ 2:12 pm
It was difficult to come to any conclusions from the breakdown you gave, although, it was interesting. Living in the southwest part of the State I can tell you, anecdotally only, that the votes AGAINST Obama might be significant, even if some for politically incorrect reasons. Based on the facts you give, even if we largely apportion the new registrants for Obama, say 75%, I would wager it will not overcome the tendency to vote Republican throughout most of the State. My guess is, that the race will be closer than '04, but McCain will squeak by (for fun, I'll guess by 100,000 or less). Thanks for the stats. Like to know where you got them.
Comment by David — September 16, 2008 @ 2:13 pm
David, I agree about reaching firm conclusions. None of this is as scientific as it could be, and it's not intended to be an argument that Obama can or will win here. I was just skeptical that a Democrat has a serious chance in Virginia, so I set out to see if it was adding up in the limited ways I could tackle it myself. My conclusion, if there is one, is that it's not entirely implausible that Obama could win Virginia. Not a very strong statement. The source of my data is the Virginia State Board of Elections, to which there's a link within the post. Took me a while to pull it all together for comparison, but it's all right there on the SBE site.
Comment by Matt — September 16, 2008 @ 2:15 pm
With all of that information,can you dispute that most democrats live in the city and most republicans live in the county?Why is that?
Comment by Mrs.Bryant — September 16, 2008 @ 2:16 pm
Even though Virginia has not supported a democrat for President in many years, we have supported dems for governor the last 2 times and I think the time may be write. With a push to register black voters, the polls may not reflect the final outcome in November. This is one 55 year old white guy who has had enough of Bush's misguided policies and I am ready for a change - I will be voting for Obama because he represents more honesty that we have seen in 8 years. He may not be perfect and I may not agree on all the issues, but I am all for change in Washington and politics in general.
Comment by Bill — September 18, 2008 @ 9:24 pm