2009.05.14
UVa Insider, The Column
I can’t remember the last time I had spoken to Roanoke Catholic boys’ basketball coach Joe Gaither before I called him today.
Gaither has been the most prominent figure in inner-city Roanoke basketball for the past 25 years and he asked me, “What went wrong with Dave Leitao?”
Early in his tenure, Leitao came to Roanoke to speak at the Roanoke Catholic boys’ basketball banquet and I’m sure Gaither always appreciated that.
I’m not sure what went wrong with Leitao, or if anything went wrong. I think he was pretty much the same coach in Year 4 that he was in Year 1, except that he behaved a lot better.
Leitao was ejected after picking up two technical fouls in the seventh game of the 2006-2007 season and I’m not sure he had another technical until this February at Clemson, when he was whistled for being about 5 feet onto the playing floor. I had a pretty good view of the play that led to the technical – a no-call when the Cavaliers’ Jeff Jones was knocked to the floor – and would say that Leitao had every right to be irritated.
But, in the second half of his tenure, he was less abusive to the officials and less abusive to his players. He had been cautioned by his superiors and had taken their advice. He was criticized by the father of senior forward Mamadi Diane for poor communication with the player and his family, but I’m not sure that Diane, himself, felt Leitao was some kind of ogre.
There has been very little Leitao-bashing from his former players; in fact, I can’t think of anything the least bit incendiary.
Maybe that’s because most of them got a fair shot. Take Diane or Jeff Jones or Sammy Zeglinski or Mustapha Farrakhan, any of the players whose playing time yo-yoed up and down. If they were honest, each of them would have to admit that they had their shots and didn’t make the most of it.
Some would blame Leitao’s downfall on recruiting. But, I challenge somebody to take Virginia’s 2008-2009 roster and list all of the offers received by Virginia’s scholarship players. Then, do the same for Clemson or Boston College or Maryland – everybody but the Big Two of North Carolina and Duke.
I would say Virginia’s players were just as heavily recruited as anybody’s but UNC’s, Duke’s and possibly Wake Forest’s or Georgia Tech’s. But, hey, Georgia Tech finished behind the Cavaliers. Wake continues to recruit better than Virginia, most recently taking Travis McKie out of Richmond, and that shouldn’t happen.
Others might blame Leitao’s downfall on his staff. Previous regimes fell apart after Jeff Jones lost Dennis Wolff and Pete Gillen lost Bobby Gonzalez and Tommy Herrion, but did the departure of ex-Leitao aide Rob Lanier really make that much of a difference? Florida hasn’t really taken off since his addition, but don’t bet against the Gators.
IN THE END, Leitao lost his job because his superiors could see the apathy that was beginning to envelop the program. The apathy came from losing, but why were they losing?
For one thing, Leitao didn’t have a system or scheme to hang his hat on. He received input from ex-Williams coach Dave Paulsen and tried to install the motion offense, but that didn’t work. His teams regularly ranked at the bottom of the ACC in scoring defense and field-goal percentage defense.
But, I keep coming back to “roster management,” and that’s what I told Gaither. Leitao almost always was at the 13-scholarship limit and, in 2007-2008, he had the equivalent of 15 scholarship players considering that Ryan Pettinella and Calvin Baker were paying their way.
Counting two fall signees and 11 scholarship underclassmen, Virginia seemingly did not have any more grants for 2009-2010 but Leitao continued to pursue players for that season. I can’t remember a single player that Leitao “ran off,” but why not leave yourself with some options and not assume somebody is going to leave?
Do players pay attention to the numbers crunch? Maybe not. If they did, it might drive them nuts.
Players like Diane and Jones and Farrakhan had their opportunities, but what if they’d had a little longer leash? Would UVa have been better in the end? Ultimately, Leitao had too many players with similar skills. He had a lot of options, but not enough good ones.
BENNETT WAS IN Roanoke on Tuesday night for an annual spring social put on by the Virginia Athletics Foundation and if there was one word to describe him, it would have been “genuine.”
Bennett spoke for 10-15 minutes before taking questions and was followed by head football coach Al Groh, who estimated that he has been to Roanoke nearly 20 times and must enjoy the experience because he spoke for about 30 minutes.
It seemed that a crowd of approximately 150 appreciated Bennett’s relative brevity. He took several questions about his “pack” theory of defense and said that three of the cornerstones of his system are not giving up transition baskets, avoiding careless turnovers and not giving up offensive rebounds.
ONE NOTE OF CAUTION for Virginia basketball is the qualifying status of fall signee Jontel Evans, a point guard for Bethel High School. Evans still has not qualified for freshman eligibility, although it is believed he is close.
It is unlikely that Evans would have started but his reputation as a defender seemingly would endear him to Bennett.






Did anyone at RCC ask Al Groh why, with his record and salary, he is still Head Coach at UVa?
Comment by Kellogg Hunt — May 14, 2009 @ 10:28 pm
No comment except he was the wrong choice from the very beginning. He really never got involved with the community as well as the Alumni. We have a seperate weekend for only basketball alumni and he never once made an appearance. He was downright rude to Jim Hobgood the radio color analyst on the air on several occasions. His behavior on the sideline was otracious as was his language. Lastly, if his players never said anything derogatory about him it was probably due to fact they were more mature than he was. His motivation strategy was to berate them if they made a mistake form demeaning there manhood or their mental capabilities. As you probably have guess I for one will not look back and say I'm sorry to see him go. We wasted four years and he only won when he had Singletary and Reynolds along with Jason Cain. They were all of Gillin's recruits and when he had to win with his own he failed miserably. The new coach will be a God send and in my humble but somewhat knowlegable opinion put Virginia back where it belongs.
Comment by Tony Laquintano — May 15, 2009 @ 3:32 pm
As you say, based on the interest level from other major programs, Leitao's recruits had some potential. However virtually none of them demonstrated much measurable improvement within a season or certainly year-to-year. As you listed, surely these were amongst the causes: roster mgmt, staff coaching skill, system, and incessant nagging injuries [a factor you didn't mention]. However there is another factor that I think deserves consideration.
You mentioned how other high-level programs recruited some of the same players who committed to Leitao......but were there any reports of other high-level programs interested in hiring Coach Leitao? Not that I recall
I believe Uva's interest in Leitao was not shared in the ACC, BE, SEC, Pac-10, and Big-12 [years after Leitao's hire Big East expansion included DePaul and several other regional programs]. Therefore one has to wonder: why was Uva uniquely interested?
In recruiting players, fans and media would rarely become enthused about a prospect who wasn't coveted by other high-level programs. In fact Uva rarely recruits such players. Why should Coach Leitao's hire have been made an exception?
Comment by Wahoo Walt — May 15, 2009 @ 8:34 pm
Walt,
Reading your post, I'm reminded of the John Casteen factor in the Leitao hiring.
Of course, Casteen was the president at Connecticut prior to taking over the UVa presidency and couldn't help but notice the strides that UConn had made under Jim Calhoun.
I've tried to tone down the Casteen-bashing on numerous fronts but I think we all found it a little amusing when Casteen said at Leitao's introduction that he had watched game film before approving the hire.
I can see where Leitao would have appealed to Casteen, giving his support over the years for affirmative action. Remember, Leitao was the first coach of color to coach one of UVa's varsity programs.
DD
Comment by Doug Doughty — May 21, 2009 @ 3:30 pm
Tony,
What an honor to have a former great respond to one of these columns !
The fact that Leitao did not immerse himself in the alumni basketball weekends comes as a surprise to me and serves as something of an indictment.
DD
Comment by Doug Doughty — May 21, 2009 @ 3:31 pm
Doug,
If you recall, at the time of the DL hiring Pres. Casteen specifically cited his own renewed awareness that a mens' head bb coach is a constant rep of the university due to the heavy 'face time' they have on TV broadcasts.
He liked the affirm action, he liked the image, and he liked the success at Uconn. Only the first was accomplished but since the other majors didn't covet Leitao, only Casteen, one can assume that Leitao's problem was Leitao with the exception of the fact that he can't be faulted for accepting the position of a school unusually interested in enriching him
thanks
Comment by Wahoo Walt — May 21, 2009 @ 11:43 pm
Well, since Terry Holland left, Virginia has been through 3 head coaches. I just feel that Tony Bennett may be over his head also. By that I think UVa hired someone young with the idea that he could have 30 years ahead of him as the head coach at UVa.
Do you know how unlikely that would be, for a head coach to survive 30 years at an ACC school?!
The NCAA rule book is impossible to follow, the pressures of trying to recruit against Duke and UNC are incredible, and I'm afraid that Tony Bennett is too young and too inexperienced to survive at UVa. I hope I'm wrong.
He reminds me of Jeff Jones in so many ways: a very nice guy from a real basketball background, but he may be over his head at UVa.
Comment by Nelson — May 22, 2009 @ 6:55 pm