.....Advertisement.....
.....Advertisement.....
New River Notebook

Court to hear Blacksburg big-box appeals

Attorneys involved in the contentious case of the Blacksburg big-box store widely thought to be a Wal-Mart Supercenter got a shock at a hearing Wednesday in Richmond.

In a rare moment of candor, Virginia Supreme Court Justice Barbara Milano Keenan told attorneys for the town, Ohio developer Fairmount Properties and activist group BURG that the court would likely grant two appeals seeking to block construction of a 186,000-square-foot store planned behind the Gables Shopping Center.

Town Attorney Larry Spencer characterized Keenan’s comments as extremely rare. Writ panels convene several times a year to consider which appeals filed to the state’s highest court will be accepted. But rulings are generally issued in writing several weeks after the panel meets.The official ruling must still be issued, Spencer said.

Fairmount attorney Jim Cowan declined to comment Wednesday, saying he needed to discuss the day’s events with his clients. But if the appeals do go forward as Keenan indicated, construction of the big-box store will surely be delayed for several months.

There are technically two appeals related to the project.

Blacksburg Town Council wants the power to strictly regulate or nix the big-box and has been fighting for that right for more than a year. The council has, however, lost its argument before its own Board of Zoning Appeals and in Montgomery County Circuit Court. Both bodies have ruled that Fairmount has a right to build without further governmental interference.

Members of the anti-Wal-Mart group BURG, or Blacksburg United for Responsible Growth, filed their own appeal in the case hoping to block the big-box store.

The writ panel considered both appeals Wednesday and, according to Spencer, Keenan said both would likely be granted.

A supreme court ruling in this case could set a precedent in Virginia land-use law by clarifying the fuzzy boundary between the rights of localities to regulate land use and the rights of property owners to develop their land. If the justices reject the appeal, Fairmount can break ground.

Only a fraction of appeals filed to the court are accepted. This would be the second time in less than two years that the high court has granted an appeal for a Blacksburg case. In 2007, the court ruled that the council could not be held to a 30-year-old annexation agreement that promised public sewer service to residents of the Toms Creek basin.

-- Tonia Moxley

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Search

About this blog

Welcome to the New River Notebook blog, written by the reporters in our New River Valley bureau, located in Christiansburg. We cover everything from education to industry, local government to cops and what's important throughout our rural farmland. Meet the staff

Want to bring up a topic of your own? Click on the SHARE link and tell us. Or contact us in person, by e-mail or phone.

RSS feed

SHARE: E-mail us new topics you'd like to address, send us story ideas or upload pictures

Community Current: Visit the Community Current blog, the gathering place for community events, pictures and tidbits from around the New River Valley.

Comments

    • roudyred: Max: Way to go. The selection committee did some great pickin’ too.
    • roudyred: Max: Way to go. The selection committe did some greàt pickin’ too.
    • roudyred: Way to go. The selection committe did some greàt pickin’ too.
    • Ted Lawson: I’ve always been a true Hokie fan and admire the coaching of Beamer and his staff. However, I do...
    • Eugene A. Lesman: I did not know Maj. Hasan but as a retired Army Officer, I see the need to set a few facts straight...