<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Groh will be only OC to go</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/2008/12/09/groh-will-be-only-oc-to-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/2008/12/09/groh-will-be-only-oc-to-go/</link>
	<description>The Roanoke Times sports writers blog on a variety of sports at both the high school and collegiate levels in Southwest Virginia.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: hokiefan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/2008/12/09/groh-will-be-only-oc-to-go/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>hokiefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/?p=1358#comment-824</guid>
		<description>Frank I have to point out that you cannot always expect great things out of recruits. Take Elan Lewis for example if you remember him. He went to the Army All American game as a senior in high school, a very highly touted running back, but once he got here to Blacksburg he was hampered by injuries his entire career and eventually left for a division 2 or 3 school. 
Basically every viewpoint on the subject matter has been covered though. As pointed out O'Cain is one of the worst quarterbacks coaches in the nation. Hite is not very good either, but the talent he has to work with is making him look better. Newsome is not great either, but he is a good recruiter so thats probably the main reason he is even being used.
I feel it is time for a change, but only Beamer knows when that time will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank I have to point out that you cannot always expect great things out of recruits. Take Elan Lewis for example if you remember him. He went to the Army All American game as a senior in high school, a very highly touted running back, but once he got here to Blacksburg he was hampered by injuries his entire career and eventually left for a division 2 or 3 school.<br />
Basically every viewpoint on the subject matter has been covered though. As pointed out O'Cain is one of the worst quarterbacks coaches in the nation. Hite is not very good either, but the talent he has to work with is making him look better. Newsome is not great either, but he is a good recruiter so thats probably the main reason he is even being used.<br />
I feel it is time for a change, but only Beamer knows when that time will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/2008/12/09/groh-will-be-only-oc-to-go/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/?p=1358#comment-823</guid>
		<description>My favorite comment above is: "It's not enough just to win, this was not a winning year for us."

Yeah, Tech didn't contend for a national championship, but they were ACC champions for the second straight year. They could fire their offensive co-ordinator. They could fire the head coach. They could replace them both.

But other teams are trying to win too, at the same time that Virginia Tech is. Tech doesn't have a monopoly on good players.

But what if they wound up like Notre Dame, a program that just keeps going down, down, down, down down? Other than Lou Holtz' championship year it's gone down now for 34 years if you look at their won-loss records.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite comment above is: "It's not enough just to win, this was not a winning year for us."</p>
<p>Yeah, Tech didn't contend for a national championship, but they were ACC champions for the second straight year. They could fire their offensive co-ordinator. They could fire the head coach. They could replace them both.</p>
<p>But other teams are trying to win too, at the same time that Virginia Tech is. Tech doesn't have a monopoly on good players.</p>
<p>But what if they wound up like Notre Dame, a program that just keeps going down, down, down, down down? Other than Lou Holtz' championship year it's gone down now for 34 years if you look at their won-loss records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/2008/12/09/groh-will-be-only-oc-to-go/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/?p=1358#comment-821</guid>
		<description>Hokie nation and others are right, and I know it just as they do. If we are ever to reach the places nationally that we want to reach, this offense is not going to get us there. My statement is that I do not think that a change will be made in the offense. I really don't think so, that doesn't mean that a change should not be made. It seems very clear to everyone that as long as we win games that a change will not be made. It is also clear to everyone that for us to go to higher places that changes will have to be made. We are capable of much more with our program at Virginia Tech and we know it. We also know that it would not take a very lot for us to go to higher places.  I always enjoy reading everyone's comments. Please sent more of them for me to read.  GO HOKIES!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hokie nation and others are right, and I know it just as they do. If we are ever to reach the places nationally that we want to reach, this offense is not going to get us there. My statement is that I do not think that a change will be made in the offense. I really don't think so, that doesn't mean that a change should not be made. It seems very clear to everyone that as long as we win games that a change will not be made. It is also clear to everyone that for us to go to higher places that changes will have to be made. We are capable of much more with our program at Virginia Tech and we know it. We also know that it would not take a very lot for us to go to higher places.  I always enjoy reading everyone's comments. Please sent more of them for me to read.  GO HOKIES!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/2008/12/09/groh-will-be-only-oc-to-go/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>Karrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/?p=1358#comment-819</guid>
		<description>As we know, this is the third year that Tech has had a pathetic offense. Not to defend Stinespring, but is it just a coincidence that this is the third year for the O line coach (Kurt Newsome), the WR coach (Kevin Sherman), and the QB coach (Mike O'Cain)?  This suggests to me that the problem with Tech's offense is not solely due to Stinespring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we know, this is the third year that Tech has had a pathetic offense. Not to defend Stinespring, but is it just a coincidence that this is the third year for the O line coach (Kurt Newsome), the WR coach (Kevin Sherman), and the QB coach (Mike O'Cain)?  This suggests to me that the problem with Tech's offense is not solely due to Stinespring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hokie nation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/2008/12/09/groh-will-be-only-oc-to-go/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>hokie nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/?p=1358#comment-818</guid>
		<description>Disagreed with you there Frank.  

Whenever you see incompetance in an organization, you have to remove it.  You do not want that incompetance to spread to the other parts of the organization.  Incompetance is a cancer.    

We've been fortunate at Tech because we have a firewall called Coach Foster that will not let that incompetance seep into the his defense.  If we ever lose Coach Foster this very well could happen.

If Coach Foster ever did leave, Stinespring would lose his insurance plan of only having to field an offense with a pulse.  

The Hokies deserve better that an offense in the bottom 10% of the nation three years in a row.  Especially when our defense has been in the 10% for five years running.  

Coach Hite at the end of the ACC Championship bragged about how the VT staff has about 89 years experience between them.  That each member knows what the other members are thinking.  I say that in some aspects a very bad thing.  In my mind that shows a very stagnant environment where new ideas and new thinking have a hard time seeing the light of day.  I can honestly say that after seeing the Stinespring offense for 7 years that they are zoid of new ideas.  If he didn't have folks like Taylor out there just making plays out of his running, our offense would be even more pedestrian.  

Yes, incompetance must be removed from an organization.  Stinespring's incompetance is clearly obvious to all after 7 years.  

Will Beamer allow the cronyism to continue?
Will Weaver allow the cronyism to continue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disagreed with you there Frank.  </p>
<p>Whenever you see incompetance in an organization, you have to remove it.  You do not want that incompetance to spread to the other parts of the organization.  Incompetance is a cancer.    </p>
<p>We've been fortunate at Tech because we have a firewall called Coach Foster that will not let that incompetance seep into the his defense.  If we ever lose Coach Foster this very well could happen.</p>
<p>If Coach Foster ever did leave, Stinespring would lose his insurance plan of only having to field an offense with a pulse.  </p>
<p>The Hokies deserve better that an offense in the bottom 10% of the nation three years in a row.  Especially when our defense has been in the 10% for five years running.  </p>
<p>Coach Hite at the end of the ACC Championship bragged about how the VT staff has about 89 years experience between them.  That each member knows what the other members are thinking.  I say that in some aspects a very bad thing.  In my mind that shows a very stagnant environment where new ideas and new thinking have a hard time seeing the light of day.  I can honestly say that after seeing the Stinespring offense for 7 years that they are zoid of new ideas.  If he didn't have folks like Taylor out there just making plays out of his running, our offense would be even more pedestrian.  </p>
<p>Yes, incompetance must be removed from an organization.  Stinespring's incompetance is clearly obvious to all after 7 years.  </p>
<p>Will Beamer allow the cronyism to continue?<br />
Will Weaver allow the cronyism to continue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/2008/12/09/groh-will-be-only-oc-to-go/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/?p=1358#comment-817</guid>
		<description>It certainly is admirable that we got where we are today and where we will be on 1/1/09.  That is not, however, to say that it all was due to the adequacy of the O-line and/or the play calling.  Some was and some was due to luck and the bad fortunes of others. 

I understand the desire to want to be able to "run" when everyone can guess that is what will happen.  A team would love to know they could have their way with the defense. I don't think we're that team right now. A smarter thing to do would have been to adjust, even to a large degree, the play book to the talent level that could be fielded. Maybe those types of adjustments are incompatible with the capabilitiy of the players to make such adjustments week to week. But maybe there is some intransigence by the OC to go very far astray from what the boss wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly is admirable that we got where we are today and where we will be on 1/1/09.  That is not, however, to say that it all was due to the adequacy of the O-line and/or the play calling.  Some was and some was due to luck and the bad fortunes of others. </p>
<p>I understand the desire to want to be able to "run" when everyone can guess that is what will happen.  A team would love to know they could have their way with the defense. I don't think we're that team right now. A smarter thing to do would have been to adjust, even to a large degree, the play book to the talent level that could be fielded. Maybe those types of adjustments are incompatible with the capabilitiy of the players to make such adjustments week to week. But maybe there is some intransigence by the OC to go very far astray from what the boss wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Golfman2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/2008/12/09/groh-will-be-only-oc-to-go/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Golfman2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/?p=1358#comment-816</guid>
		<description>It's not enough just to win, this was not a winning year for us.  Four losses is not a winning season for the college football elite.  We had our chance to win the division outright and did not.  If Beamer and Weaver say that because we win the ACC and even win the orange bowl that the offence does not need change then there's your problem.  Go back through the season and count the scores we had on defence and the scores we had set up by a big defensive play.  To get to the level of the Florida's, Texas, Oklahoma, Ohio State, USC.  We have to have an OC with big game and big time experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's not enough just to win, this was not a winning year for us.  Four losses is not a winning season for the college football elite.  We had our chance to win the division outright and did not.  If Beamer and Weaver say that because we win the ACC and even win the orange bowl that the offence does not need change then there's your problem.  Go back through the season and count the scores we had on defence and the scores we had set up by a big defensive play.  To get to the level of the Florida's, Texas, Oklahoma, Ohio State, USC.  We have to have an OC with big game and big time experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/2008/12/09/groh-will-be-only-oc-to-go/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/?p=1358#comment-815</guid>
		<description>While many, many Virginia Tech fans want a change in the offensive coordinator of the football team, do not look for it to happen. It seems now as it always has seemed, that as long as the team wins that no changes will be made it the coaching staff. Many fans are correct that when Bryan Stinespring was hired into the position that he had no experience at the position and that he may not have been qualified for the job, he had not been a coordinator before this job. Fans are correct to point out the low ranking of the Tech offense. The low national ranking is a fact that can not be denied. As always a fact is a fact, and the fact is that the offense is ranked very low year after year. There probably will not be a change in the position now, we have just won the conference championship and are in a BCS bowl game. There are many players returning next year on offense and there is a highly rated back in school that is a redshirt freshman who will be playing next year. There is a highly rated running back recruited for next year and a highly rated tight end that might play wide receiver for us. There are two quarterback prospects that we are recruiting that are highly rated and if we get one or both of them we will have a lot of talented players on offense. The real issue is that will that result in our offense being improved and more productive. If it is not improved after this something will have to be done. The reason for that is that if we are to be a powerful nationally ranked team and a possible national championship contender the offense must improve. If it does not improve and help take the team to bigger and better places, there may not be many more chances for such success of this nature. Good players will look at the situation and think that if the talented players that were at Tech ahead of them were not successful then why should they sign on with  Tech and have their talents wasted. Then we as Tech fans and the Tech team would be in a tough situation, a situation that might not ever get better for a long time, if ever. Other teams would pass us by and we would be left behind. That is the real reason for concern about the offensive coordinator position at Virginia Tech.  GO HOKIES!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many, many Virginia Tech fans want a change in the offensive coordinator of the football team, do not look for it to happen. It seems now as it always has seemed, that as long as the team wins that no changes will be made it the coaching staff. Many fans are correct that when Bryan Stinespring was hired into the position that he had no experience at the position and that he may not have been qualified for the job, he had not been a coordinator before this job. Fans are correct to point out the low ranking of the Tech offense. The low national ranking is a fact that can not be denied. As always a fact is a fact, and the fact is that the offense is ranked very low year after year. There probably will not be a change in the position now, we have just won the conference championship and are in a BCS bowl game. There are many players returning next year on offense and there is a highly rated back in school that is a redshirt freshman who will be playing next year. There is a highly rated running back recruited for next year and a highly rated tight end that might play wide receiver for us. There are two quarterback prospects that we are recruiting that are highly rated and if we get one or both of them we will have a lot of talented players on offense. The real issue is that will that result in our offense being improved and more productive. If it is not improved after this something will have to be done. The reason for that is that if we are to be a powerful nationally ranked team and a possible national championship contender the offense must improve. If it does not improve and help take the team to bigger and better places, there may not be many more chances for such success of this nature. Good players will look at the situation and think that if the talented players that were at Tech ahead of them were not successful then why should they sign on with  Tech and have their talents wasted. Then we as Tech fans and the Tech team would be in a tough situation, a situation that might not ever get better for a long time, if ever. Other teams would pass us by and we would be left behind. That is the real reason for concern about the offensive coordinator position at Virginia Tech.  GO HOKIES!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Realistic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/2008/12/09/groh-will-be-only-oc-to-go/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>Realistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/?p=1358#comment-814</guid>
		<description>I understand that it isn't all about yards, Lets look at scoring offense, Because somestimes the team that scores the most wins. 

Oklahoma = 1
Florida = 3
VT = 89

Thats "whack" The VT offense is just fine. 

Here is what is "whack"
Replace 7 Starters on Defense.

Total Defense Rank
VT = 7
Florida = 9
Oklahoma = 65</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that it isn't all about yards, Lets look at scoring offense, Because somestimes the team that scores the most wins. </p>
<p>Oklahoma = 1<br />
Florida = 3<br />
VT = 89</p>
<p>Thats "whack" The VT offense is just fine. </p>
<p>Here is what is "whack"<br />
Replace 7 Starters on Defense.</p>
<p>Total Defense Rank<br />
VT = 7<br />
Florida = 9<br />
Oklahoma = 65</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Realistic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/2008/12/09/groh-will-be-only-oc-to-go/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>Realistic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/pressbox/?p=1358#comment-813</guid>
		<description>I have come to the realization that Stinespring will not be fired this year, thank you Georgia Tech. I have dropped that cause and started pushing to remove the National Championship Trophy Case. Beamer and some fans have become content with 10 wins or backing our way into an ACC Championship. Since we are completely happy with winning the ACC the way we did, there is no chance we will ever win a National Championship. To win a National Championship you must have good special teams, a quality defense and a great offense. Beamers philosophy is Special Teams and Defense. Weaver and Beamer just aren’t interested in winning a National Championship. So we need to quit lying to the recruits and let them know our goal is 10 wins and an ACC Championship. Maybe we have a trophy case just for that.  Florida offense rank 18, Oklahoma offense rank 3. VT rank 107.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have come to the realization that Stinespring will not be fired this year, thank you Georgia Tech. I have dropped that cause and started pushing to remove the National Championship Trophy Case. Beamer and some fans have become content with 10 wins or backing our way into an ACC Championship. Since we are completely happy with winning the ACC the way we did, there is no chance we will ever win a National Championship. To win a National Championship you must have good special teams, a quality defense and a great offense. Beamers philosophy is Special Teams and Defense. Weaver and Beamer just aren’t interested in winning a National Championship. So we need to quit lying to the recruits and let them know our goal is 10 wins and an ACC Championship. Maybe we have a trophy case just for that.  Florida offense rank 18, Oklahoma offense rank 3. VT rank 107.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
