<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush vs. Clinton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/2009/01/06/bush-vs-clinton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/2009/01/06/bush-vs-clinton/</link>
	<description>Read and comment on topics posted by The Roanoke Times editorial board.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/2009/01/06/bush-vs-clinton/#comment-33581</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/?p=8850#comment-33581</guid>
		<description>"Can we say warrantless wiretaps? Can you say skewed tax laws for only "married" individuals? Can you say banned adoptions?" - Will

Hey, didn't Obama end up supporting wiretaps?  

Skewed tax laws?  You are right on the married part.  And it also subsidizes having children, which I think is wrong too.  But our current system also steals from one population to hand out to other in exchange for votes?  

I think Obama changed his tax refund policy to exclude non-working individuals ONLY after some pressure.

Suicidal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Can we say warrantless wiretaps? Can you say skewed tax laws for only "married" individuals? Can you say banned adoptions?" - Will</p>
<p>Hey, didn't Obama end up supporting wiretaps?  </p>
<p>Skewed tax laws?  You are right on the married part.  And it also subsidizes having children, which I think is wrong too.  But our current system also steals from one population to hand out to other in exchange for votes?  </p>
<p>I think Obama changed his tax refund policy to exclude non-working individuals ONLY after some pressure.</p>
<p>Suicidal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/2009/01/06/bush-vs-clinton/#comment-33524</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/?p=8850#comment-33524</guid>
		<description>Jim...

John Adams was completely correct. Can we say warrantless wiretaps? Can you say skewed tax laws for only "married" individuals? Can you say banned adoptions?

Freedom to live an unobstructed and productive life...so long as you live it within these defined parameters. That's liberty alright.

I believe it was Obama that asked for the luncheon...not W. W just happened to be able to host it and I would have been very surprised had he said anything but what he did. To have done anything less would have been suicidal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim...</p>
<p>John Adams was completely correct. Can we say warrantless wiretaps? Can you say skewed tax laws for only "married" individuals? Can you say banned adoptions?</p>
<p>Freedom to live an unobstructed and productive life...so long as you live it within these defined parameters. That's liberty alright.</p>
<p>I believe it was Obama that asked for the luncheon...not W. W just happened to be able to host it and I would have been very surprised had he said anything but what he did. To have done anything less would have been suicidal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/2009/01/06/bush-vs-clinton/#comment-33523</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/?p=8850#comment-33523</guid>
		<description>What really fascinates me about this post is that it wasn't long ago that the RT called for an end to partisan fighting and to begin to unify around Obama.  I know, that's the sappiest most politically self-serving thing we've heard.  But then you get this post, which clearly doesn't support that request.  This blog is just hysterical.

On a separate note, 5 former Presidents got together to support Obama during these trying times.  Current President Bush stated, "All of us who have served in this office understand that the office transcends the individual.  And we wish you all the very best. And so does the country."  Looks like Bush has class and humility and puts the country first, but the angry left, here the RT, doesn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really fascinates me about this post is that it wasn't long ago that the RT called for an end to partisan fighting and to begin to unify around Obama.  I know, that's the sappiest most politically self-serving thing we've heard.  But then you get this post, which clearly doesn't support that request.  This blog is just hysterical.</p>
<p>On a separate note, 5 former Presidents got together to support Obama during these trying times.  Current President Bush stated, "All of us who have served in this office understand that the office transcends the individual.  And we wish you all the very best. And so does the country."  Looks like Bush has class and humility and puts the country first, but the angry left, here the RT, doesn't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Other John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/2009/01/06/bush-vs-clinton/#comment-33506</link>
		<dc:creator>Other John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/?p=8850#comment-33506</guid>
		<description>Adding to the Adams quote...at least until another revolutionary war once the people are fed up with not having any remaining liberties.  The founders were smart about the second amendment.  A disarmed populace is one that cannot rise up against the ruling class...aka government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding to the Adams quote...at least until another revolutionary war once the people are fed up with not having any remaining liberties.  The founders were smart about the second amendment.  A disarmed populace is one that cannot rise up against the ruling class...aka government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/2009/01/06/bush-vs-clinton/#comment-33505</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/?p=8850#comment-33505</guid>
		<description>"I'm glad you'll miss W because I for one won't." 

Huhhhh?

"He has been a prime example of the hypocracy of a person."

Whaaaat?

Those are stinging rebukes Will.

"yet we can't give liberties to many of our own here in this country."

You mean like the right to own firearms for defense of home?  Or maybe the right to decide whether or not to buy health insurance?  Or maybe the right to pursue your own lives rather than join or be spied upon by a national civilian security force?  Can you say KGB?  Or how about crade-to-grave government programs that forcibly tell you what to do at each stage of your and your families lives?  How about oppressive taxes to fund increasing entitlements?

I believe it was John Adams who said, "once liberty is lost it is gone forever".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I'm glad you'll miss W because I for one won't." </p>
<p>Huhhhh?</p>
<p>"He has been a prime example of the hypocracy of a person."</p>
<p>Whaaaat?</p>
<p>Those are stinging rebukes Will.</p>
<p>"yet we can't give liberties to many of our own here in this country."</p>
<p>You mean like the right to own firearms for defense of home?  Or maybe the right to decide whether or not to buy health insurance?  Or maybe the right to pursue your own lives rather than join or be spied upon by a national civilian security force?  Can you say KGB?  Or how about crade-to-grave government programs that forcibly tell you what to do at each stage of your and your families lives?  How about oppressive taxes to fund increasing entitlements?</p>
<p>I believe it was John Adams who said, "once liberty is lost it is gone forever".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/2009/01/06/bush-vs-clinton/#comment-33484</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/?p=8850#comment-33484</guid>
		<description>You mean he was tried. Clinton didn't do a thing. I doubt Obama will either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean he was tried. Clinton didn't do a thing. I doubt Obama will either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/2009/01/06/bush-vs-clinton/#comment-33480</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/?p=8850#comment-33480</guid>
		<description>Henry...

At least Clinton tried. W didn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry...</p>
<p>At least Clinton tried. W didn't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/2009/01/06/bush-vs-clinton/#comment-33477</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/?p=8850#comment-33477</guid>
		<description>"yet we can't give liberties to many of our own here in this country."

Did Clinton give those liberties to them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"yet we can't give liberties to many of our own here in this country."</p>
<p>Did Clinton give those liberties to them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/2009/01/06/bush-vs-clinton/#comment-33472</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/?p=8850#comment-33472</guid>
		<description>Jim...

I'm glad you'll miss W because I for one won't. I've voted Republican over the years having voted for RR but W has got to have been the worst leader the free world has ever encountered.

We talk about fighting for liberties of the downtrodden in foreign lands and yet we can't give liberties to many of our own here in this country. He has been a prime example of the hypocracy of a person.

He'll have a legacy all right...but not one that many would like to have hanging around their necks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim...</p>
<p>I'm glad you'll miss W because I for one won't. I've voted Republican over the years having voted for RR but W has got to have been the worst leader the free world has ever encountered.</p>
<p>We talk about fighting for liberties of the downtrodden in foreign lands and yet we can't give liberties to many of our own here in this country. He has been a prime example of the hypocracy of a person.</p>
<p>He'll have a legacy all right...but not one that many would like to have hanging around their necks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/2009/01/06/bush-vs-clinton/#comment-33469</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/roundtable/?p=8850#comment-33469</guid>
		<description>Obama isn't even in office and the deficit is already falling

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090107/bs_nm/us_usa_budget_8

The U.S. budget deficit will swell to a record $1.186 trillion in fiscal 2009 as the global recession saps the economy, congressional forecasters said on Wednesday, presenting a daunting challenge to President-elect Barack Obama who has said tough choices will be necessary. 

The Congressional Budget Office also forecast the deficit will likely fall to $703 billion in the 2010 fiscal year which begins October 1, 2009, as the U.S. recession begins to ease in the second half of this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama isn't even in office and the deficit is already falling</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090107/bs_nm/us_usa_budget_8" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090107/bs_nm/us_usa_budget_8</a></p>
<p>The U.S. budget deficit will swell to a record $1.186 trillion in fiscal 2009 as the global recession saps the economy, congressional forecasters said on Wednesday, presenting a daunting challenge to President-elect Barack Obama who has said tough choices will be necessary. </p>
<p>The Congressional Budget Office also forecast the deficit will likely fall to $703 billion in the 2010 fiscal year which begins October 1, 2009, as the U.S. recession begins to ease in the second half of this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
