Today's first two letters are among the more ridiculous we've seen in this election. Suggesting that police officers will be safer under Cuccinelli than under his opponent is patently absurd. In reality, police officers would be no less or more safe under Cuccinelli than they would be if (pick any random person) were elected. The second one suggests that we have to elect Cuccinelli to keep our private property safe. Uh, if what you really want is some sort of amendment to that effect, Cuccinelli could have accomplished that more effectively from the GA than as AG.
Today's first two letters are among the more ridiculous we've seen in this election. Suggesting that police officers will be safer under Cuccinelli than under his opponent is patently absurd. In reality, police officers would be no less or more safe under Cuccinelli than they would be if (pick any random person) were elected. The second one suggests that we have to elect Cuccinelli to keep our private property safe. Uh, if what you really want is some sort of amendment to that effect, Cuccinelli could have accomplished that more effectively from the GA than as AG.
Comment by gdad — October 30, 2009 @ 1:43 pm