.....Advertisement.....
.....Advertisement.....
The Round Table

Long: Eminent domain decision is troubling

Violating property rights

John Long
Long, a Roanoke Times columnist, is director of the Salem Museum and teaches history at Roanoke College.

I had thought about writing a Thanksgiving column expressing gratitude that we live in a free nation, but instead I’m wondering how true that is anymore. The plight of some property owners on Reserve Avenue in Roanoke should be of concern to us all.

A quick overview of the case: The mighty Carilion Clinic has ambitious plans for the area around Roanoke Memorial Hospital, an immense development complex that promises great benefit for the community. Over the past decade, the Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority has purchased virtually all the property in the area to pass on to Carilion. That is, all except one tract on Reserve owned by B&B Holdings and leased to a small flooring company. The housing authority really wants that thorn out of their side.

The Burkholders, owners of B&B Holdings, have reportedly turned down a $1 million offer for the land, hoping to get more. But the assessment on the two lots (if I read the city’s GIS Web page correctly) is $1,344,000. Would you sell your property for less than the assessment? Of course, ultimately any land is worth exactly what a buyer will pay and the owner will take, assuming the free market is allowed to work its magic.

Instead, in order to force the Burkholders off land they legally own and purchased in good faith, the housing authority has ruled the area “blighted,” though not necessarily the B&B lot itself. Really? The only thing I see blighted along South Jefferson Street is the forgotten wasteland that used to be Victory Stadium. But then, a blight designation anymore is less about cleaning up urban environments and more about a local government getting its way. The blight label will allow the land to be seized by eminent domain and turned over for redevelopment. Last week, a court ruled that the area had been properly deemed blighted, and so the tract could be condemned and sold by the housing authority.

I don’t know the Burkholders, and I have no problem with the Carilion development plans, which seem pretty impressive. But the the housing authority’s action smacks of tyranny to me, and the threat to private property rights should not be ignored.

The principle of eminent domain is a long-established one, allowing state, local, or federal government agencies to seize private property for public purposes, with fair compensation of the owner. The reason eminent domain is scaring a lot of people lately is the unpredictable expansion of government power through the 2005 Kelo decision. In that ruling, the Supreme Court decided “public use” included condemning property and turning it over to another owner who will end up paying more taxes on the land.

Nationwide, a shiver went up the spines of folks who recognize the importance of private-property rights. A government can now seize your property not because it needs to build a road or school, but because it thinks someone else will make better use of it.

Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, in a dissent joined by Justices Rehnquist, Thomas and Scalia, seemed to predict exactly what’s happening down on Reserve: “Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party, but the fallout from this decision will not be random. The beneficiaries are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms.”

Incidentally, the land seized by New London, Conn., after the Kelo case, land they hoped to turn into a cash cow of tax revenues, has apparently never been developed and has only cost the town money. The Pfizer Co. that was to solve all their local fiscal worries recently moved out.

Where does such government intrusion stop? For more than 200 years eminent domain has worked, not perfectly, but to the satisfaction of most. Now it threatens to invalidate the property rights of law-abiding citizens.

Property rights are a cornerstone of our American freedoms and a key to a prosperous nation. When local governments get away with Kelo-style land grabs, we are all victims. If Roanoke wants to acquire the Burkholders’ property, let them do it the old-fashioned way: Buy it fair and square.

5 Comments »

  1. The saddest part of this story is that this is not the first time, for Roanoke City Government. I speak of the case of Dr. Claytor, in Gainsboro. The use of eminent domain for the use of the politically connected for economic purposes is immoral. Yet, it is accepted with hardly a yawn. As a property owner in Roanoke City, I have a certain ambiguity concerning my long term presence and future developement of my property. One side of me says this is a decent place to live, but the other side says, is my property really mine in perpetuity? Will my property rights be respected as I age into my vulnerable senoir years?

    Comment by Just Saying... — November 26, 2009 @ 8:10 am

  2. Following the Kelo decision there were a flurry of bills introduced (and passed) in the Virginia legislature regarding Eminent Domain. How did this particular case evade those new laws?

    Comment by Ed S. — November 26, 2009 @ 10:12 am

  3. "live in a free nation, but instead I’m wondering how true that is anymore."

    Where has Long been? This has been the state of affairs since 1787, when the US Constitution let the power of eminent domain stand with no restrictions except "just compensation" to the owner.

    And that phrase has always been a joke. You don't get anywhere near just compensation; you don't get any recognition of the work you have done to develop your property to suit your own needs; you don't get reimbursed for the expense of searching for & buying a replacement property. All you get is what these capitalism sycophants call "fair market value".

    Comment by Ed H — November 26, 2009 @ 1:40 pm

  4. And that phrase has always been a joke. You don't get anywhere near just compensation; you don't get any recognition of the work you have done to develop your property to suit your own needs; you don't get reimbursed for the expense of searching for & buying a replacement property. All you get is what these capitalism sycophants call "fair market value".

    Comment by Ed H — November 26, 2009 @ 1:40 pm

    Nice try, but this has absolutely nothing to do with capitalism.

    Comment by Jim W. — November 27, 2009 @ 8:44 am

  5. Jim W.,

    It has everything to do with capitalism. The conservatives who moan and groan over eminent domain are just complaining about government doing it's legitimate job to regulate business activity. They care as much for homeowners as conservation hunters care for animal rights.

    Comment by Ed H — November 27, 2009 @ 12:32 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Search

Comments

    • Dan Radmacher: Henry, So you think our military can take on Iran in a full engagement in addition to Afghanistan and...
    • Henry: Sandi So you think our military is unable to fight this war? You have a dim view of our military
    • Henry: “then use of the blogs has to be tied to a subscription” It would be you and me manning this...
    • Henry: Maybe he could just blame Kaine for everything and then do nothing. That seems to work for Obama.
    • Cold in P: I’m on the fence here. Don’t want a user’s tax at this time but I’m a...