<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new type of cloud?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/weatherjournal/2009/07/02/a-new-type-of-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/weatherjournal/2009/07/02/a-new-type-of-cloud/</link>
	<description>Kevin works the copy desk for The Roanoke Times and is its principal weather geek, offering weather reporting training classes to reporters and advising the newsroom on upcoming weather stories.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/weatherjournal/2009/07/02/a-new-type-of-cloud/#comment-3038</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/weatherjournal/?p=2509#comment-3038</guid>
		<description>Not sure if I'd agree or disagree either way at this point; both sides make good cases (is a new cloud type vs. isn't new).  However, I think the turbulence they suspect causes the undulations is just as valid as the turbulence that causes, say, roll clouds.  I also think pilots would want to know if they were approaching, or  esp. landing or taking off, under those things.  I'll be curious to hear how the World Meteorological Organization reacts after studying this.  The pics are awesome, though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if I'd agree or disagree either way at this point; both sides make good cases (is a new cloud type vs. isn't new).  However, I think the turbulence they suspect causes the undulations is just as valid as the turbulence that causes, say, roll clouds.  I also think pilots would want to know if they were approaching, or  esp. landing or taking off, under those things.  I'll be curious to hear how the World Meteorological Organization reacts after studying this.  The pics are awesome, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sirius the Star Dog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/weatherjournal/2009/07/02/a-new-type-of-cloud/#comment-3037</link>
		<dc:creator>Sirius the Star Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.roanoke.com/rtblogs/weatherjournal/?p=2509#comment-3037</guid>
		<description>"...the humble cloud is seen as a "wild card" in climate-change prediction, Pretor-Pinney said.

"LeMone agreed that clouds are a "big unknown" in climate change, mostly because climate-change models do not provide a high-enough resolution to determine what clouds' impacts will be on a changing world."

Don't know whether either cloud picture qualifies as a new type; however the above quote from the second link is a huge chink in the global warming 'we're all gonna die' scenario.

Clouds are binary in global climate models (GLM).  IIRC...the GLM grid spacing is 250 km (155 sm).  Each box on the grid covers ~24K sq. miles It's either cloud-filled or cloud-free.  Not very a compelling representation of the atmosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"...the humble cloud is seen as a "wild card" in climate-change prediction, Pretor-Pinney said.</p>
<p>"LeMone agreed that clouds are a "big unknown" in climate change, mostly because climate-change models do not provide a high-enough resolution to determine what clouds' impacts will be on a changing world."</p>
<p>Don't know whether either cloud picture qualifies as a new type; however the above quote from the second link is a huge chink in the global warming 'we're all gonna die' scenario.</p>
<p>Clouds are binary in global climate models (GLM).  IIRC...the GLM grid spacing is 250 km (155 sm).  Each box on the grid covers ~24K sq. miles It's either cloud-filled or cloud-free.  Not very a compelling representation of the atmosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
