...Advertisement...

...Advertisement...

What, if anything, should DGIF stock in Carvins Cove?

As I wrote about in a note in my Sunday column, Roanoke has tweaked its rules at Carvins Cove Natural Reserve, the 12,000-plus acre outdoor paradise at the center of which sits a pretty little reservoir.

Starting today the city will charge all users the same fees, and will also allow anyone to bring their personal boat (as long as that boat meets the city's inspection criteria).

The changes open the door for the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries to once again take an active role in the lake's management. The DGIF had backed off for years because the previous rules that gave preferential treatment to residents of just a few localities essentially privatized the lake in the DGIF's eyes, and the agency doesn't work with private lakes with restricted access.

Even without DGIF help the lake has been doing pretty well. It's a pretty good bass lake, although it can be tough to fish. It also has some nice sunfish and some great crappies.

Could it be even better? I spoke with DGIF biologist Bud LaRoche on Monday and he thinks so. He says the DGIF would like to get back involved, and would probably stock walleyes and stripers.

If you follow the Virginia Angler Recognition Program you know the lake still has a few stripers from long-ago stockings. Last year it produced a couple of whoppers. When I moved here about 10 years ago I heard the walleye fishing was still decent even though it hadn't been stocked since the early 1990s. I haven't heard of any walleyes in a long time.

Whatever happens, we anglers won't reap the benefits for a while. If the lake is stocked it probably won't happen until next spring, so the fish won't be catchable size for a couple of years. Before putting any fish into the lake biologists will have to get out there and do some sampling to determine the forage. It used to have gizzard shad, LaRoche told me. Without a decent forage base a predator like stripers wouldn't work very well.

The question is, assuming the biologists find sufficient forage for stripers, what would you all like to see stocked out there? Just stripers and walleyes? Something we haven't thought about? Would you support special regs to protect certain fish? Or are you happy just letting the reservoir keep going on its own?

Comments

# 1

[July 2, 2008 8:18 AM]

v allen esquire

I think that it should be let to keep going on it's own. I don't think that game commision funds should be used to stock a pay water, which is basically what Carvins Cove would be by the fees charged for access. A boat launching fee only would be ok. Fee paying should be at commisnion owned propertys only on the pay as you go basis.

# 2

[July 2, 2008 9:06 AM]

John

I feel like they should stock just walleyes. We have plenty of striper waters nearby, but no real good walleye waters in the Roanoke area.

I feel that anglers would also have more success fishing for walleye since the main bait used is night crawlers, and they are much easier to obtain than striper bait.

I think the lake in general is better suited for walleye fishing in general.

# 3

[July 2, 2008 10:30 AM]

Michael L. Smith

Mark -- Is the lake deep enough that it might support rainbow trout in a "two-story" fishery? I have seen a few lakes where this really can work well -- and trophy bass production always seems to get a boost as a side benefit. -- Mike Smith Lexington, VA

# 4

[July 2, 2008 12:27 PM]

Bryan Thompson

The "outdoor paradise" won't be paradise anymore if Carvins Cove continues to get publicity about stocking stripers and walleye. Everybody and their brother will want a piece of the action. I say leave it alone.

# 5

[July 2, 2008 1:26 PM]

Mark Taylor

Thanks for the comments, everyone. Some interesting ideas there.

John, the ban on aquatic bait does pose some challenges for striper fishing. But you certainly can catch them on artificials so it's not like a striper fishery would be totally underutilized.

Michael, I actually asked Bud LaRoche about trout. The records he had, which dated back to the early 1970s, showed no trout stocking since then. But I've heard trout were stocked there at one time. It's an intriguing idea, especially when you look at what has happened in those California water supply reservoirs where those bass get huge gorging on stockers. One thing is for sure -- trout and stripers don't mix because the stripers really hammer them.

As for publicity ruining Carvins Cove, Bryan, there are different schools of thought on that. I certainly don't want to see it turn into a zoo, but I just don't see that happening no matter how good the fishing gets. For one thing, there's the horsepower restriction. And there's the 21-day rule, which limits pressure.

My personal belief is if something can be done to get more people out there fishing and enjoying the outdoors, let's do it -- even if it means I might have to share one of my favorite spots (and Carvins Cove is one of them) with a few more people.

Thanks for reading and, again, for the comments.

mt

# 6

[July 3, 2008 11:33 AM]

Scott

How about some Northern Pike?

# 7

[July 5, 2008 9:33 AM]

Pete Kesler

Thanks Mark for beginning this blog. For a short period (less than 2 years) I have become an ardent fisherman at CC. In fact, I bought an inflatible bass boat to specifically fish it. Then I learned I couldn't use the boat, so I worked with the Water Authority folks to establish a safe standard to allow suitable inflatables.

CC is a beautiful resource and at first, I wanted to save it for the benefit of the locals. It is such a jewel. However, to your point it seems fair to share the "wealth". I hope we don't end up getting too much pressure to distract from fishing success. The beautiful layout of many of the coves, natually makes them almost a solo fishing site(s). So I expect, for those that like to fish shorelines and protected areas like the coves, we might see some added slowness in success levels.

I'll look forward to watching this site to become more informed on the progress at CC. Thanks again for getting this blog started.

Pete

# 8

[July 5, 2008 4:04 PM]

Mark Taylor

Interesting idea on the pike, Scott. That would add a unique dimension, but I won't even pretend to know whether or not it's biologically sound. Doesn't hurt to ask, though.

Thanks for the comments, Pete. You and I met out there one day when you were pulling your boat out and I was asking you a bunch of questions about it. That's one awesome craft!

Thanks for reading the blog, and taking the time to comment.

mt

# 9

[July 6, 2008 8:52 AM]

Pete

Hi Mark:

Recently there was an article on June 18th regarding the Rutrough Road Point issue. I wondered if I could launch my boat there. Thanks in advance for the response.

# 10

[July 8, 2008 6:26 PM]

Dan Dombrosky

Mark I was excited to find your blog on Carvins Cove. I have been so pained over that for years. The management to say the least has been beyond pathetic. Kicking the DGIF out with their "agenda" rules was pretty close to criminal if you ask me. We have this beautiful resource in the valley and it is utilized by very few regulars almost as a private club. I strongly favor walleyes only, stripers are abundant in the Chesapeake and Smith mountain,Moomaw is a trout mecca. Virginia, is a complete failure with walleyes as far as I am concerned. Forget the stripers and concentrate on walleyes with a good forage base. Places like IA and KS for gosh sakes have created outstanding walleye fisheries in recent years. Bass are everywhere and who cares if they ever catch another one. Again go to Moomaw, Smith Mountain, Claytor. Philpot is a use your imaginatin walleye fishery. Please encourage the powers to be to make an attempt to really have a walleye fishery in the area. I probably ticked a bunch of folks off with the above comments and I was really just trying to get a reaction. Whatever they do at Carvins Cove will be a godsend and tell the Zebra Mussel alarmists to get a life, that has been nothing more than a red herring to keep everyone out of there.

# 11

[July 9, 2008 12:55 PM]

Fred Bradley

Mark,

Large & smallmouth bass along with crappie and sunfish/blue gill types have always been the backbone of lake fishing in this area of the country. I don't think that is going to change, so VDGIF should stock what is going to provide the best fishing for the most people. Stripers would be great fun if a proper supply of shad, etc. could be established. It's great to see some excitement about beefing up the fishing prospects at CC! Keep us posted!

# 12

[July 9, 2008 2:26 PM]

Mark Taylor

Thanks for the comments.

I replied to Pete via e-mail, but in case anyone else wonders about that launching spot on the Roanoke River near Explore Park, it's not a ramp so you must be able to hand-launch your craft.

Dan and Fred, thanks for adding your opinions to this discussion. I will mention this dialog to Bud LaRoche and his counterparts in hopes they see what the public is saying. I'll keep you posted on developments.

Thanks for reading.

mt

# 13

[July 9, 2008 3:43 PM]

scott

I think they should stock the special breed of smallmouth that only get 8 inches long. They can stock those, or fall fish.

# 14

[July 10, 2008 7:33 AM]

Mark Taylor

Scott,

No one (but me) has any idea what you are talking about. Of course, they will after Sunday's installment of the Summer Smallmouth Tour in The Roanoke Times.

mt

Post a comment





Search


Quick thoughts

  • A valid e-mail address is required for commenting -

    While the vast majority of readers submitting comments to this blog provide valid e-mail addresses on the comment form, a few folks, for whatever reason, insist on providing fake addresses.

    The deal is simple: To comment on this blog, a valid e-mail address is required.

    I will conduct random checks to ensure that addresses are valid. Be assured, the address you submit on the comment form is not public, and not accessible to spam bots. It will not be used for any other purpose than verification.

    Additionally, from time to time this blog touches on some topics on which we have passionate and sometimes divergent views. Debate is fun and productive. Please keep things polite and respectful. Personal attacks won't be allowed.

    Obviously, libelous comments are non-starters.

    Thanks to all of you for reading, and a special thanks to those of you who take time to comment.

    Mark Taylor

  • Slipstream cycling team pushing clean riding -

    The New York Times ran a really interesting article today about a cycling team that's going above and beyond in order to prove its riders are not using performance-enhancing drugs.


  • Another use for GPS -

    Here's one for Jay Leno's Stupid Criminal file.

  • Cochran on Sunday Hunting -

    For another objective look at the Sunday hunting survey, check out the great column by my good friend Bill Cochran.

  • Killing rock snot -

    Scientists in New Zealand have found a way to kill didymo, an invasive algae sometimes called rock snot. Didymo has appeared recently in a couple of Virginia trout streams, including the Smith and Jackson river tailwaters.

Categories

More outdoor news

Mark Taylor's outdoors columns

Top outdoors stories

About this blog

Mark Taylor holding a fish.

While growing up in rural Southern Oregon, Mark Taylor developed a passion for the outdoors while he and his younger brother tagged along with their father on fishing, hunting and camping adventures.

Graduating from Northwestern University in 1988, Taylor spent four years as an officer in the U.S. Navy based in Norfolk before moving into journalism.

After five years writing about the military for a Norfolk-based publishing company, he became the outdoors editor at The Roanoke Times in 1998. He lives in Roanoke with his wife and twin daughters.

E-mail Mark Taylor

RSS feed

.....Advertisement.....